Performance Indicators and Benchmarks Sample Clauses

Performance Indicators and Benchmarks. The Parties as part of the National Partnership Agreement have agreed on a overall set of performance indicators that provide benchmarks and indicators for reporting targets and milestones on reducing homelessness in the ACT. The initiatives introduced under the National Partnership Agreement will assist in meeting these targets and milestones. The ACT recognises however, that these targets cannot be met in totality without a whole of service system response including mainstream services and agencies. A staged process of review of homelessness specific and mainstream programs is being undertaken in the ACT to increase the effectiveness of the new initiatives and to implement a whole of service system response. This process will examine current services and examine how they can be reformed to meet the new directions and performance targets. The targets and milestones agreed between the parties under the National Partnership Agreement are therefore contingent on the whole service system response in the ACT. External factors such as changes in economic activity, unemployment etc can also directly affect performance indicators and outcomes. Taking these factors into account a realistic approach has been taken in setting the overarching performance targets and milestones as detailed and set out in the Table at Attachment A. ATTACHMENT A - Table of Performance Indicators and Benchmarks are for the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness for the Australian Capital Territory. Performance Indicator Initiatives/ Programs Baseline “Was” Performance Benchmark “Will Be” Reduction/ Increase Target 2010-2011 Target 2011-2012 Target 2012-2013 Proportion of Australians who are homeless All of the Initiatives to be implemented under the NPA on Homelessness will contribute to a 7% decrease in the number of persons who are homeless in the ACT. Homeless Persons: In the XXX 0000 people are homeless (Counting the Homeless 2006) Homeless Persons: By 2013, a decrease of 7 per cent in the number of people who are homeless to fewer than 1268 people Homeless Persons: Reduction of 96 people Homeless Persons: Decrease of 3 per cent in the number of people who are homeless to fewer than 1323 people. Homeless Persons: Decrease of 5 per cent in the number of people who are homeless to fewer than 1298 people. Homeless Persons: Decrease of 7 per cent in the number of people who are homeless to fewer than 1268 people. Homeless ATSI Persons: In the ACT 149 Aboriginal & Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Is...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Performance Indicators and Benchmarks

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Service Objectives D4.1 The Services will:

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!