PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS Sample Clauses

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS. RATING DEFINITION Ineffective Minimal or no evidence of employee performing duties at an acceptable level. Performance is clearly inadequate. Immediate corrective measures are required. Area for Growth Some evidence of employee performing duties at an acceptable level. Some performance is inadequate. Corrective measures may be necessary. Effective Employee performs duties adequately and effectively. Evidence of meeting expectation. Exemplary Employee exceeds performance standard. Evidence of exceeding expectation. CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION Date: Employee Name: Location/Department: Position Title:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS. Each Employee shall be rated by his or her immediate supervisor. Upon completion of the rating, Employees will be personally informed of their respective evaluations by the immediate Supervisor who prepared the evaluation. The original copy shall be placed in the Employee's personnel file. Any Employee who wishes to review his performance evaluation with the Chief of Police must make a written request to the Chief of Police within two weeks of receiving his copy of the evaluation and must identify each area he wishes to review and cite a brief basis for reviewing that area. The matter will be discussed with the Chief of Police as expeditiously as circumstances permit. Upon request, the employee may have a Union representative at the meeting with the Chief of Police. It is specifically agreed that no aspect of this Article shall be subject to the grievance procedure. This Article shall remain in effect for the duration of the Agreement at which time it shall automatically terminate.
Sample 1Sample 2
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS. A. Each Employee shall be rated by his or her immediate supervisor at least once per year.
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS. Unsuccessful/ Unacceptable Performance Partially Successful Performance/ Needs Improvement Fully Successful/ Effective Performance Superior/ Highly Effective Performance Distinguished Performance and Role Model Status
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS. Each employee shall be rated by his or her immediate Supervisor. Upon completion of the rating, employees will be personally informed of their respective evaluations by the immediate Supervisor who prepared the evaluation. The original copy shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file. The evaluation document content and methods shall be modeled after an evaluation from Chatham, Georgia with modifications as determined necessary by a committee of Department stakeholders including both union members and management. The committee shall include a member from each functional area of the Department: Chief’s Office, lieutenant, sergeant, detective, 2 police officers appointed by the bargaining unit and a Police Service Officer also appointed by the bargaining unit. The Evaluation Committee shall present a completed evaluation document to be used to evaluate employees by the end of one year following the signing of this Collective Bargaining Agreement or from any arbitration decision. Any employee who wishes to review his/her performance evaluation with the Chief of Police must make a written request to the Chief of Police within two weeks of receiving his/her copy of the evaluation and must identify each area he wishes to review and cite a brief basis for reviewing that area. The matter will be discussed with the Chief of Police as expeditiously as circumstances permit. Upon request, the employee may have a Union representative at the meeting with the Chief of Police. Performance evaluations shall be removed from the personnel file after a two year period. It is specifically agreed that no aspect of this Article shall be subject to the grievance procedure. Performance evaluations shall not be used for discipline.
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS 
Sample 1

Related to PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Purpose: To provide the policy and procedures for assessing employee performance and communicating the results of assessment to the employee and to others using assessment information in personnel decisions, and further to express the mutual commitment of the parties to the University’s values.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.