Our Priorities: Vulnerable People Sample Clauses

Our Priorities: Vulnerable People. The Issues Vulnerability is a significant issue for Glasgow, with many individuals and families facing situations where they are subject to increased levels of risk. People can be exposed to greater levels of vulnerability based on the situations they face themselves in such as sickness, low income, or bereavement. Additionally, there are those at risk through the behaviours of others such as prejudice and discrimination. All of these issues place great stress and pressure on individuals and communities. Evidence suggests that a disproportionate number of Glaswegians lives are impacted by a range of issues surrounding vulnerability. For example, SIMD 2012 demonstrates that over one-in-five (22%) Glaswegians are income deprived, compared to 13% nationally. One third (33%) of Glasgow children are defined as living in xxxxxxx00, compared to 19% across Scotland. Almost one-in-ten children in Glasgow (9%, or 10,415) are known to Social Work Services. The number of children looked after in the city was 3,761 in July 201114, over 23% of the Scottish total, despite Glasgow accounting for less than 11% of children in Scotland. The number of people prevented from working as a result of disability or sickness (and potentially limiting income) is 43,000 in Glasgow, or 36% of the inactive population, compared to just 31% of the equivalent Scotland population and 24% across the UK. Over one-in-four adults in Glasgow (115,000) have a mental health issue15. This can lead to greater levels of vulnerability for some in this group – e.g. people with mental health issues are three times more likely to be in debt. A sizeable number of new migrants have arrived in the city in the past 5-10 years from different routes – for example, as refugees or economic migrants. For some parts of the city such as Pollokshields East, up to half of residents are from Black or Minority Ethnic (BME) communities. This provides some unique challenges in relation to the provision of key services to support such diversity of residents – e.g. how public bodies can support individuals and families who are experiencing discrimination, potential exploitation or targeted hostility. The costs to the individual and their families can be massive, both in economic and human terms. As a city and society in general, there is a great financial cost to dealing with the consequences of increased vulnerability amongst residents. A significant proportion of public sector budgets focus on supporting individuals and ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Our Priorities: Vulnerable People. The Issues Vulnerability is a significant issue for Glasgow, with many individuals and families facing situations where they are subject to increased levels of risk. There are many trigger points that increase vulnerability, reflecting key stages in people’s lives, such as childhood, having families or old age. Equally, people can be exposed to greater levels of vulnerability based on the situations they face themselves in such as sickness, low income, or bereavement. Additionally, there are those at risk through the behaviours of others such as prejudice and discrimination. All of these issues place great stress and pressure on individuals and communities. Evidence suggests that a disproportionate number of Glaswegians lives are impacted by a range of issues surrounding vulnerability. For example, SIMD 2012 demonstrates that over one-in-five (22%) Glaswegians are income deprived, compared to 13% nationally. One third (33%) of Glasgow children are defined as living in poverty12, compared to 19% across Scotland. Almost one-in-ten children in Glasgow (9%, or 10,415) are known to Social Work Services in one context or another. The number of children looked after in the city was 3,761 in July 201113, over 23% of the Scottish total, despite Glasgow accounting for less than 11% of children in Scotland. The number of people prevented from working as a result of disability or sickness (and potentially limiting income) is 43,000 in Glasgow, or 36% of the inactive population, compared to just 31% of the equivalent Scotland population and 24% across the UK. Over one-in-four adults in Glasgow (115,000) have a mental health issue14. This can lead to greater levels of vulnerability for some in this group – e.g. people with mental health issues are three times more likely to be in debt. Glasgow has the largest concentration of non-white residents across Scotland. In 2008, this was estimated at over 11% (almost 67,000). Whilst many are members of long standing settled communities, a significant proportion have arrived in the city in the past 5-10 years from different routes – for example, as refugees or economic migrants. For some parts of the city such as Pollokshields East, up to half of residents are from Black or Minority Ethnic (BME) communities. This provides some unique challenges in relation to the provision of key services to support such diversity of residents – e.g. how public bodies can support individuals and families who are experiencing discrimination, prej...

Related to Our Priorities: Vulnerable People

  • SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE ADULTS 8.1 The Service Provider will have ultimate responsibility for the management and control of any Regulated Activity provided under this agreement and for the purposes of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Xxx 0000.

  • Abuse and Neglect of Children and Vulnerable Adults: Abuse Registry Party agrees not to employ any individual, to use any volunteer or other service provider, or to otherwise provide reimbursement to any individual who in the performance of services connected with this agreement provides care, custody, treatment, transportation, or supervision to children or to vulnerable adults if there has been a substantiation of abuse or neglect or exploitation involving that individual. Party is responsible for confirming as to each individual having such contact with children or vulnerable adults the non-existence of a substantiated allegation of abuse, neglect or exploitation by verifying that fact though (a) as to vulnerable adults, the Adult Abuse Registry maintained by the Department of Disabilities, Aging and Independent Living and (b) as to children, the Central Child Protection Registry (unless the Party holds a valid child care license or registration from the Division of Child Development, Department for Children and Families). See 33 V.S.A. §4919(a)(3) and 33 V.S.A. §6911(c)(3).

  • Safeguarding and Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults The Supplier will comply with all applicable legislation and codes of practice, including, where applicable, all legislation and statutory guidance relevant to the safeguarding and protection of children and vulnerable adults and with the British Council’s Child Protection Policy, as notified to the Supplier and amended from time to time, which the Supplier acknowledges may include submitting to a check by the UK Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) or the equivalent local service; in addition, the Supplier will ensure that, where it engages any other party to supply any of the Services under this Agreement, that that party will also comply with the same requirements as if they were a party to this Agreement.

  • National Treatment and Most-favoured-nation Provisions (1) Neither Contracting Party shall in its territory subject investments or returns of nationals or companies of the other Contracting Party to treatment less favourable than that which it accords to investments or returns of its own nationals or companies or to investments or returns of nationals or companies of any third State.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD:

  • Foreign-Owned Companies in Connection with Critical Infrastructure If Texas Government Code, Section 2274.0102(a)(1) (relating to prohibition on contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure) is applicable to this Contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 2274.0102, Contractor certifies that neither it nor its parent company, nor any affiliate of Contractor or its parent company, is: (1) majority owned or controlled by citizens or governmental entities of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or any other country designated by the Governor under Government Code Section 2274.0103, or (2) headquartered in any of those countries.

  • Security Safeguards (1) Each party acknowledges that it is solely responsible for determining and communicating to the other the appropriate technological, physical, and organizational security measures required to protect Personal Data.

  • Security Awareness and Training We have implemented and maintain an information security and awareness program that is delivered to employees and appropriate contractors at the time of hire or contract commencement and annually thereafter. The awareness program is delivered electronically and includes a testing aspect with minimum requirements to pass. Additionally, development staff members are provided with secure code development training.

  • Substance Abuse Treatment Information Substance abuse treatment information shall be maintained in compliance with 42 C.F.R. Part 2 if the Party or subcontractor(s) are Part 2 covered programs, or if substance abuse treatment information is received from a Part 2 covered program by the Party or subcontractor(s).

  • Contractor and Employee Security Precautions A. The security aspects of working at the Correctional Facility are critical. The following security precautions are part of the site conditions and are a part of this Contract. All persons coming on the site in any way connected with this Work shall be made aware of them, and it is the (General) Contractor’s responsibility to check and enforce them.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.