Our Approach Sample Clauses

Our Approach. The Parity Check Code − − Due to the fact that the computation cost of limb adaptation grows linearly with the distance of the code, we choose for the simple parity check code [n, n 1, 2]2. This code has a single parity limb that is the sum of all n 1 native limbs. Adopting such a code simplifies limb adaptation and transpositions as follows: • Xxxx adaptation modifies a limb and the parity limb. Its computation cost is twice as large as if it was computed on the native state alone. • None of the n! possible limb transpositions requires a correcting adaptation, as all limbs are in the (single) parity equation. Paradoxically, as a non-native limb transposition on the parity check code has no computation cost, it is cheaper to compute it than do the equivalent embedded mapping that requires n − 2 bitwise limb additions. The primary goal of our approach is the guaranteed detection of any single- limb fault in the computation. The secondary goal is that it should be hard to enforce two or more compensating faults in the computation or in the registers. The easiest attack on limb adaptation would be to inject two compensating faults in the two φ computations. In this respect it is a good idea in software implemen- tations to use different computation sequences and/or different registers so that the attacker has to induce two different faults for them to be compensating. For the same reason, in dedicated hardware implementations one shall not use the same combinatorial circuit for both φ. Instead of attacking the computation, an attacker could attack the registers and inject compensating faults on two limbs. To be successful, such attacks would require knowledge of the implementation details and the ability to inject faults very precisely. The parity check code offers fault detection capabilities that are close to duplication. It detects any single-limb fault instead of any single fault, but not multiple faults. On the other hand, it can be implemented much more efficiently thanks to the cheap limb transpositions and uses less memory, since the state size increases only by 1/(n − 1) instead of 2.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Our Approach. As shown in section 2.2, to modify a program that is wo- ven may cause a problem. It is useful to verify the correct- ness of the weaving. As in the example of the Line.moveBy method in the previous section, the behavior of a program is changed by weaving. Consequently, we can verify the correctness of the weaving by verifying the correctness of the behavior change. Such behavior change during weaving can be rep- resented as the program behavior before and after weaving. Therefore, it is effective to specify this program behavior before and after weaving and to verify whether the behav- ior specification is satisfied. Program behavior can be rep- resented as a property of the control and data flow graph of the program. For instance, a control flow graph of the Line.moveBy method after weaving is shown in Figure
Our Approach. We introduce a probabilistic approach to find paths belonging to different homotopy classes for socially- aware robot motion planning. Our approach is com- plete, it can find all the possible paths, namely all the homotopy classes implicitly encoded in the navigation graph built from a Voronoi diagram that describes the scenario. Having a set of possible paths, we choose the best one according to a cost that considers social interactions between humans.
Our Approach. In response to the economic challenges facing the State, the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA) is seeking support to assess the economic and fiscal impacts of the pandemic on the State’s economy and to develop strategies to support the State’s immediate and long-term economic recovery. Specifically, NJEDA is seeking support across 12 core tasks (Exhibit 1). In the following section, we describe how we will successfully launch each of these tasks with clear deliverables. Per NJEDA’s request, we have included four timing options for delivering Task 3-7 activities and deliverables based on various timing windows outlined in the Request for Cost Proposal. Our approach includes three core workstreams to complete the 12 tasks outlined in NJEDA’s scope, with several options to address the Task 3-7 timing options: • Workstream 1: Economic and fiscal impact assessment • Workstream 2: Economic recovery planning, advice, and coordination • Workstream 3: Economic recovery strategy Exhibit 1: Proposed workstreams, activities, and timing options. Base Period (8 weeks total for Tasks 1-12, includes 2 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support) Option 1 (Base Period plus additional 6 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~2 months) Option 2 (Base Period plus additional 14 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~4 months) Option 3 (Base Period plus additional 22 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~6 months) 2020 Core activity May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Economic and fiscal impact assessment
Our Approach. There is a strong history of partnership working in pan-Lancashire. Local CSPs take a pragmatic and flexible approach to joint working on shared priorities on a thematic and geographical footprint. Our approach will include: Closer collaboration with other partnerships (including the Safeguarding Boards, Children and Young People's Trust and the Health and Wellbeing Board) to addressing shared priorities, particularly the contributory factors and determinants that influence offending and vulnerability. Continually developing and improving links and activities with all local authorities to support local residents and better understand the geographic and demographic diversity of Lancashire. Working with the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) to deliver community safety activity that supports the aims and priorities of the Police and Crime Plan. A commitment to taking an 'early help' approach to stop the development of issues that can often become more significant challenges. Effective commissioning of services is central to delivering key activity. Feedback from those services to CSPs will be used to further inform local action planning.
Our Approach. We leverage the ordering capabilities of the Blockchain by presenting a protocol that both sends and receives information from the Blockchain to accomplish the goal of publishing a value on the Blockchain that is representative of the values from all the data sources. Towards computing a representative value, we redefine the notion of agreement. We say that two nodes agree with each other if the values that they obtained from data sources are within a pre-defined parameter called agreement distance. We say that a set of values form a coherent
Our Approach. 4.1.1 We have an internationally benchmarked and widely admired curriculum which, by combining intellectual rigour in the student’s chosen discipline with a breadth of multidisciplinary experience, ensures that our graduates leave university as critical thinkers and effective communicators, well able to face the next stage of their careers.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Our Approach. As illustrated in Figure 3, we carry out our research activities in WP4 based on a bottom-up approach. First, we go through a large set of smart city use cases and analyse their requirements based on the data processing flows they need in order to produce their required results. After that, we try to abstract their concrete requirements into some common and generic patterns, which form the basis of our edge programming model. To realize such a programming model, we design and implement the XXxxX.xx edge computing framework, which provides specific interfaces for service developers to design and operator their IoT services. In parallel we can carry out some studies to optimize the performance of the core algorithms in such a framework, such as task allocation algorithm or task migration algorithm. Once the initial framework is finished, we start to validate its programming model and interfaces with some implemented use cases, such as smart parking use case, lost child finding use case.

Related to Our Approach

  • Contractor Approach The Contractor shall develop, document, and implement BIDM Data Exchanges to obtain BIDM Imports from and to send BIDM Exports to the Department's claims review contractors.

  • General Approach The parties will strive to achieve on-going performance improvement. They will follow a proactive, collaborative and responsive approach to performance management and improvement. Either party may request a meeting at any time. The parties will use their best efforts to meet as soon as possible following a request.

  • Project Approach € Project schedules and budgets are reviewed by the Project Manager on a weekly basis during our company-wide Project Managers Meeting using project status reports generated by our control software (Deltek Vision). Progress is compared to the schedule and budget to ensure adequate resources are available and that necessary coordination is occurring. Costs are reported real time, with actual labor based on time sheet entry and actual expense costs based on invoices. The reporting system can be customized to track specific tasks or efforts in multiple categories, making it flexible enough to adapt to any project specific requirements. We hold regular project coordination meetings to facilitate communication and information transfer among the design team. These meetings are held weekly and are supplemented with e-mail communication, as well as telephone conversations. We hold monthly project status meetings with your project manager to update project status, discuss priorities, and receive direction from City staff. This provides an opportunity for communication and information to flow openly between the City and the design team. These meetings are supplemented by communications that will occur via e-mail and telephone. We conduct meetings with other agencies and stakeholders impacted by the work as needed. E-mail and telephone communication work well for quick questions or minor issues, but we have found that the most effective means of communication with other agencies and stakeholders is the “old-fashioned” face- to-face mexxxxx. Xxbble’s record of providing quality civil engineering services to our clients reflects our ability to manage multiple projects effectively and efficiently. Our philosophy is that each project is personally overseen by one of our principal officers, thereby providing immediate attention to all project aspects (i.e. negotiations, communications, schedule, budgets).

  • Approach All investments are to be made using the value approach by investing in companies at prices below their underlying long term values to protect capital from loss and earn income over time and provide operating income as needed. With regard to equities, no attempt is made to forecast the economy or the stock market. The manager will attempt to identify financially sound companies with good potential profitability which are selling at large discounts to their intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of low prices may consist of some or all of the following characteristics: low price earnings ratios, high dividend yields, significant discounts to book value, and free cash flow. Downside protection is obtained by seeking a margin of safety in terms of a sound financial position and a low price in relation to intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of financial integrity which are regularly monitored, include debt/equity ratios, financial leverage, asset turnover, profit margin, return on equity, and interest coverage. As a result of this bargain hunting approach, it is anticipated that purchases will be made when economic and issue-specific conditions are less than ideal and sentiment is uncertain or negative. Conversely, it is expected that gains will be realized when issue-specific factors are positive and sentiment is buoyant. The investment time horizon is one business cycle (approximately 3-5 years). As regards bonds, the approach is similar. No attempt is made to forecast the economy or interest rates. The manager will attempt to purchase attractively priced bonds offering yields better than Treasury bonds with maturities of 10 years or less that are of sound quality i.e. whose obligations are expected to be fully met as they come due. We do not regard rating services as being an unimpeachable source for assessing credit quality any more than we would regard a broker's recommendation on a stock as being necessarily correct. In any form of investment research and evaluation, there is no substitute for the reasoned judgement of the investment committee and its managers.

  • Prior Approval The Engineer shall not assign, subcontract or transfer any portion of professional services related to the work under this contract without prior written approval from the State.

  • FAA APPROVAL This Agreement may be subject to approval of the FAA. If the FAA disapproves this Agreement, it will become null and void, and both Parties will bear their own expenses relative to this Agreement, up to the date of disapproval.

  • Prior Approvals This Contract shall not be binding unless and until all requisite prior approvals have been obtained in accordance with current State law, bulletins, and interpretations.

  • ROAD WORK PHASE APPROVAL Purchaser shall obtain written approval from the Contract Administrator upon completion of each of the following phases of road work:  Drainage installation  Subgrade compaction  Rock compaction SUBSECTION RESTRICTIONS

  • Labour Flexibility (i) An employer may direct an employee to carry out such duties as are reasonable and within the limits of the employee's skill, competence and training consistent with employee's classification, grouping and/or career stream provided that such duties are not designed to promote deskilling.

  • Interim Measures 6.1 The Parties acknowledge that the British Columbia Claims Task Force made the following recommendation concerning interim measures:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.