Other Third Party IP Sample Clauses

Other Third Party IP. Subject to clause (d) below, [****]* shall be responsible for the payment of [****]* royalties and other payments owed to Third Parties, other than amounts payable pursuant to Sections 8.6(a) and 8.6(b), in consideration of intellectual property rights that BMS reasonably believes are necessary or reasonably useful in connection with the Development or Commercialization or Manufacture of a Product in the Territory; provided, that any such royalties and other payments (including upfront fees and milestone payments) shall be treated as Allowable Expenses with respect to the U.S.; and provided, further, that each Party shall bear all Third Party royalties arising from any infringing activities by such Party prior to the Effective Date. For avoidance of doubt, this clause (c) shall apply to payments owed to Third Parties under (i) any license to [****]* or U.S. and ex-U.S. patents and pending patent applications that claim priority thereto, have a common priority claim therewith or are a foreign equivalent thereof, to the extent such patents and pending patent applications claim [****]*; (ii) any license taken as a result of exercising an option under * Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the SEC. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. [****]*, entered into as of [****]*; and (iii) any license taken as a result of exercising an option under the [****]* entered into as of [****]*.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Other Third Party IP. In the event that, after the Effective Date, any Know-How or Patent licensed to Precision by a Third Party (other than the Duke IP or Cellectis Patents) becomes necessary or reasonably useful for the Exploitation of a Licensed Product, then the Parties would discuss in good faith the terms pursuant to which Precision would grant a sublicense to TGTX under such Know-How or Patent, and subject to and effective upon the Parties’ mutual written agreement to such terms, such Know-How or Patent would be sublicensed by Precision to TGTX; provided, however, that nothing in this Agreement shall require Precision to grant any rights to TGTX under Precision’s agreement with MaxCyte. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 7.5.4 does not (a) apply to the Duke IP, Cellectis Patents or Existing In-License Agreements or (b) limit any of Precision’s representations and warranties under Section 10.1 and Section 10.2.
Sample 1Sample 2
Other Third Party IP. With respect to (a) all intellectual property rights owned or controlled by a Third Party (including any improvements by the inventors that have contributed to the BioNTech IP) and that are reasonably necessary for the Exploitation of any Collaboration Product (other than for research activities under the Research Plan), including the clinical Development of the Neoepitope Prediction Algorithm for such Collaboration Product (“Third Party IP”) or [***]
Sample 1Sample 2
Other Third Party IP. In the event that, after the Effective Date, any Know-How or Patent licensed to Precision by a Third Party (other than the Duke IP or Cellectis Patents) becomes necessary or reasonably useful for the Exploitation of a Licensed Product [***], then the Parties would discuss in good faith the terms pursuant to which Precision would grant a sublicense to Imugene under such Know-How or Patent, and subject to and effective upon the Parties’ mutual written agreement to such terms, such Know-How or Patent would be sublicensed by Precision to Imugene. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 8.6.4 does not apply to the Duke IP, Cellectis Patents or Existing In-License Agreements.
Sample 1
Other Third Party IP. Subject to Sections 2.3(b)-2.3(d), during the Term, if either Party determines that a license to additional Third Party Patent Rights is necessary or reasonably useful to Research, Develop, Manufacture or Commercialize any Licensed Compound or Licensed Product anywhere in the Territory, it shall promptly notify the other Party via the JSC and, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties in writing, Astellas shall be the Party that negotiates and executes such Third Party license and shall do so in consultation with Sutro taking into consideration Sutro’s reasonable comments (if and when executed, an “Other In-License”). As between the Parties, [*].
Sample 1
Other Third Party IP. For the avoidance of doubt, Millennium is solely responsible, in its sole discretion and at its sole cost and expense, for obtaining and maintaining any licenses or other rights to access or use any Relevant Third Party IP that may be necessary or useful in order to Develop and/or Commercialize a MPI Drug. Similarly, Precision is solely responsible, in its sole discretion and at its sole cost and expense, for obtaining and maintaining any licenses or other rights to access or use any Relevant Third Party IP that may be necessary or useful in order to Develop and/or Commercialize a Product. Precision will use Diligent Efforts to provide Millennium notice of any Intellectual Property of any Third Party that, to Precision’s Knowledge, would be infringed or misappropriated by the exploitation of Target Information by Millennium as contemplated by this Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Other Third Party IP

  • No Infringement of Third Party IP Rights Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating, or has ever infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated, any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person. The conduct of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries has not infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person or constituted unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction, and when conducted in substantially the same manner after the date of this Agreement will not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person, including patents issuing on patent applications filed as of the date of this Agreement, or constitute unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction (except to the extent due to Company’s ownership by Buyer or its affiliates). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (i) no product or service ever produced, distributed, used, provided or sold by or on behalf of the Company or any Subsidiary has ever infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person; (ii) no infringement, misappropriation or similar Action, or any Action alleging unfair competition or trade practices, is pending or has been threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary or against any other Person who may be entitled to be indemnified, defended, held harmless or reimbursed by the Company or any Subsidiary with respect to such Action; (iii) neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received any notice or other communication (in writing or otherwise) relating to any actual, alleged or suspected infringement, misappropriation or violation of any Intellectual Property Right of another Person, or any actual, alleged or suspected engagement by the Company or any Subsidiary in unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction; (iv) neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is bound by any Contract to indemnify, defend, hold harmless or reimburse any other Person with respect to any infringement, misappropriation or violation of any Intellectual Property Right (other than as set forth in Section 3.13(h) of the Disclosure Schedule); and (v) no Action involving any Licensed IP is pending or has been threatened, except for any such Action that, if adversely determined, would not adversely affect (A) the use or exploitation of such Licensed IP by the Company or any Subsidiary or (B) the distribution, hosting, delivery or sale of any Company Product. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has ever sought or obtained an opinion of counsel regarding any possible infringement, misappropriation, violation or unlawful use of another Person’s Intellectual Property Rights or the validity or enforceability of another Person’s Intellectual Property Rights.

  • Third Party Intellectual Property Rights 10.7.1 Each Party shall give prompt written notice to the other of any intellectual property rights of any third party which could reasonably be considered as constituting impediment on the use of the Ipsen Licensed Technology, Joint Inventions or Joint Patent Rights in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement or on the research, development, manufacture, use, marketing, promotion, distribution, sale, import or export of Licensed Product, in which event the Parties shall agree on the strategy and procedural steps to be taken in respect of opposing and/or settling such potential impediment.

  • Third Party Intellectual Property The Manager shall assist and fully cooperate with the Successor Manager or its designated alternate service provider in obtaining any necessary licenses or consents to use any third party Intellectual Property then being used by the Manager or any Sub-manager. The Manager shall assign, and shall cause each Sub-manager to assign, any such license or sublicense directly to the Successor Manager or its designated alternate service provider to the extent the Manager, or each Sub-manager as applicable, has the rights to assign such agreements to the Successor Manager without incurring any additional cost.

  • Infringement of Third Party Patents (a) If a third party asserts that a patent or other proprietary right owned by it is infringed by the manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale or sale of a Licensed Product in the Field and in the Territory and such alleged infringement arises in whole or in part from Alcon's use of the Pharmacyclics Technology (a "Claim"), the Party against whom such a Claim was asserted shall immediately provide the other Party notice of such Claim and the related facts in reasonable detail. Unless it is mutually agreed that the Parties should proceed jointly in defending such an action, the Party sued shall defend such action. The other Party shall cooperate in connection therewith and shall have the right to be represented separately by counsel of its own choice, at its own expense. The entity (whether Pharmacyclics or Alcon) that controls the defense of such a Claim with respect to the Licensed Product in the Field and in the Territory shall also have the right to control settlement of such Claim; provided, however, that no settlement shall be entered into without the consent of the other Party. To the extent that any of the costs set forth in clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) of this sentence are attributable to infringement arising from Alcon's use of the Pharmacyclics Technology, Alcon shall have the right to deduct from and offset against royalties otherwise payable to Pharmacyclics under Section 4.4(a), the following: (i) all litigation costs related to such Claim; (ii) any money damages paid by Alcon or its Affiliates pursuant to any judgment or settlement resulting from such Claim; and (iii) any royalty that Alcon and/or its Affiliates and sublicensees are required to pay to a third party in settlement of such Claim in order to continue to exercise Alcon's license rights as set forth in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall royalties owed Pharmacyclics under Section 4.4(a) be reduced by more than (*) in any given royalty period.

  • Third Party Technology The assignment of any applicable license agreements with respect to Third Party Technology are set forth in the General Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

  • Third Party Licenses If (a) in the opinion of outside patent counsel to Licensee, Licensee, or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees, cannot Exploit a Licensed Product in a country in the Territory without infringing one or more Patents that have issued to a Third Party in such country, or (b) as a result of any claim made against a Party, or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees, alleging that the Exploitation of a Licensed Product infringes or misappropriates any Patent or any other intellectual property right of a Third Party in a country in the Territory, a judgment is entered by a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal is taken within the time permitted for appeal, such that Licensee cannot Exploit such Licensed Product in such country without infringing the Patent or other proprietary rights of such Third Party, then, in either case, Licensee shall have the first right, but not the obligation to negotiate and to obtain a license from such Third Party as necessary for the Exploitation of any Licensed Product hereunder in such country; provided, however, that NovaDel shall have the sole right to seek any such license with respect to the Licensed Process and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such a license in its own name from such Third Party in such country, under which NovaDel shall, to the extent permissible under such license, grant a sublicense to Licensee as necessary for Licensee, and any of its Affiliates and Sublicensees, to Exploit the Licensed Product as provided hereunder in such country. Licensee shall be solely responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of all royalty and other obligations with respect to the Exploitation of the Licensed Product; provided, however, that Licensee shall have the right to credit fifty percent (50%) any royalties paid by Licensee, its Affiliates or Sublicensees under such license with respect to such country against the royalty payments to be paid by Licensee to NovaDel with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product(s) under Section 4.1; provided, however, that no royalty payment when due, regardless of the amount or number of credits available to Licensee in accordance with this Agreement, shall be reduced by more than fifty percent (50%) of the amounts otherwise owed pursuant to Section 4.1 in any calendar quarter. Credits not exhausted in any calendar quarter may be carried into future calendar quarters.

  • Third Party License Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 3710a(b)(1)(B), if PHS grants Collaborator an exclusive license to a CRADA Subject Invention made solely by an ICD employee or jointly with a Collaborator employee, the Government will retain the right to require Collaborator to grant to a responsible applicant a nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive sublicense to use the CRADA Subject Invention in Collaborator’s licensed field of use on terms that are reasonable under the circumstances; or, if Collaborator fails to grant a license, to grant a license itself. The exercise of these rights by the Government will only be in exceptional circumstances and only if the Government determines (i) the action is necessary to meet health or safety needs that are not reasonably satisfied by Collaborator, (ii) the action is necessary to meet requirements for public use specified by federal regulations, and such requirements are not reasonably satisfied by Collaborator; or (iii) Collaborator has failed to comply with an agreement containing provisions described in 15 U.S.C. § 3710a(c)(4)(B). The determination made by the Government under this Paragraph is subject to administrative appeal and judicial review under 35 U.S.C. § 203(2).

  • Third Party Patents If any Third Party claims that a patent it owns or controls claims any aspect of a Licensed Product or its manufacture, use or sale, the Party with notice of such claim shall notify the other Party promptly, and the Parties shall as soon as practicable thereafter discuss in good faith regarding the best response.

  • Third Party Patent Rights If either Party desires to bring an opposition, action for declaratory judgment, nullity action, interference, declaration for non-infringement, reexamination or other attack upon the validity, title or enforceability of a Patent Right owned or controlled by a Third Party and having one or more claims that Cover the Compound or Product, or the use, sale, offer for sale or importation of the Compound or Product (except insofar as such action is a counterclaim to or defense of, or accompanies a defense of, a Third Party’s claim or assertion of infringement under Section 7.6, in which case the provisions of Section 7.6 shall govern), such Party shall so notify the other Party and the Parties shall promptly confer to determine whether to bring such action or the manner in which to settle such action. Provention shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to bring, at its own expense and in its sole control, such action in the Territory. If Provention does not bring such an action in the Territory, within ninety (90) days of notification thereof pursuant to this Section 7.7(a) (or earlier, if required by the nature of the proceeding), MacroGenics shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring, at MacroGenics’ own expense, such action. The Party not bringing an action under this Section 7.7(a) shall be entitled to separate representation in such proceeding by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, and shall cooperate fully with the Party bringing such action. Any awards or amounts received in bringing any such action shall be first allocated to reimburse the initiating Party’s expenses in such action, and any remaining amounts shall be allocated between the Parties as provided in Section 7.5(e).

  • No Third Party Infringement To the Knowledge of the Company, no person has or is infringing or misappropriating any material Company Owned Intellectual Property.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.