ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. On this day, Plaintiff [_______________________] (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff [_____________] (“[_________]”) announced to the Court that they have settled Plaintiff’s claims for relief against [_________] and [_________]’s counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case. Plaintiff and [_________] have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against [_________] and [_________]’s counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff, with prejudice and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party incurring same. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against [_________] and [_________]’s counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. [*] CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. EXHIBIT F ENCUMBRANCES Following is a complete list of all encumbrances, license agreements, covenants not to xxx, security interests, and settlement agreements under the Patents in effect as of the Effective Date: [*] [*] CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. EXHIBIT G [*] [*] CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. EXHIBIT H [*] [*] CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. EXHIBIT B SAMPO – RPX PATENT LICENSE AND LICENSE OPTION AGREEMENT This PATENT LICENSE AND LICENSE OPTION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Sampo IP, LLC, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of Virginia, with a principal place of business at 0000 Xxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (“Licensor”), and RPX Corporation, a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx...
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Rule 1.420(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the qui tam provisions of the Florida False Claims Act, Fla. Stat. § 68.081 et seq. (“FFCA”), the State of Florida, the Relator, Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. (the “Relator”), and Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Xxxxxx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the foregoing parties collectively, “Xxxxxx Parties”) (all of the forgoing parties together, the “Parties”) filed with this Court, a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Xxxxxx Parties and Motion for Order of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Xxxxxx Parties. Upon due consideration of the Stipulation and the Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Release and the Court’s determination that the Settlement Amount appears to the Court to be fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances, the Court hereby approves the Settlement. WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. By executing this Agreement, Plaintiffs instruct Plaintiffs’ Attorneys to dismiss the Lawsuit with prejudice on the merits upon Court approval of this Agreement.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Civil Action No. 15-CV-7306 (Xxxxxxxx, X.) (Xxxxxxx, X.X.) -X IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between plaintiff United States of America and defendants Xxxxx Village Section IV Inc. and Xxxx Xxxxxxx, by their respective undersigned attorneys, that pursuant to the settlement agreement between the parties in this matter, the above-captioned action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Once this Stipulation and Order has been signed and so ordered by the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this case dismissing the action with prejudice and shall close the case. Dated: Brooklyn, New York July , 2017 XXXXXXX X. XXXXX Acting United States Attorney Eastern District of New York Attorney for Plaintiff 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxx East Brooklyn, New York 11201 By: /s/ Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxxx Assistant United States Attorney (000) 000-0000 Xxxx.Xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Dated: New York, New York June , 2017 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX & XXXX LLP Attorney for Defendants 000 Xxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000 By: Xxxx X’Xxxxxxxx (000) 000-0000 SO ORDERED this day of July, 2017 THE XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX X. GARAUFIS
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinions that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and National City Bank should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against National City Bank and all counterclaims made by National City Bank against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment. SIGNED this ____ day of _____________________, 2010
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp. (“LML”) and PayPal, Inc. (“PayPal”) should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML against PayPal and all counterclaims made by PayPal against LML therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment as between LML and PayPal. EXHIBIT B The NACHA Top 50 Originators (see attached)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., and Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (collectively “Citi”) should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against Citi and all counterclaims made by Citi against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment as between LML Patent Corp. and Citi.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. In consideration of the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit among Plaintiff and Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. EXHIBIT “B” IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA M2 Global, LTD., ) Case No. 6:09-cv-1209-MSS-KRS ) Removed Case: Case No. 05-2009-CA030179
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. In consideration of the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit among Plaintiff and Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. Dated: , 2010.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and Union Bank should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against Union Bank and all counterclaims made by Union Bank against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment.
