Open Issues. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of the Registry Agreement to the contrary (including Sections 7.6 and 7.7 thereof), Registry Operator agrees that the following requirements, procedures and provisions of the Registry Agreement (including the documents incorporated by reference therein) may be modified and amended by ICANN after the date hereof, without the consent of Registry Operator:
Open Issues. Notwithstanding any provision of the Registry Agreement to the contrary (including Sections 7.6 and 7.7 thereof), Registry Operator agrees that the following requirements, procedures and provisions of the Registry Agreement (including the documents incorporated by reference therein) may be modified and amended by ICANN after the date hereof, without the consent of Registry Operator: Specification 6 – Registry Interoperability and Continuity Specifications; Trademark Clearinghouse Requirements (§ 1 of Specification 7 of the Registry Agreement); Trademark Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (§ 2.a of Specification 7 of the Registry Agreement); Registration Restriction Dispute Resolution Procedure (§ 2.a of Specification 7 of the Registry Agreement); Uniform Rapid Suspension (§ 2.b of Specification 7 of the Registry Agreement); Specification 11 – Public Interest Commitments (including the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Process); and any provision or term of the Registry Agreement that is the subject of advice or comment from the Governmental Advisory Committee (including any advice or comment to include new provisions in the Registry Agreement). Any such modifications and amendments are referred to herein as a “Required Change.” ICANN’s right to implement Required Changes under this Supplement shall expire on 15 January 2014. ICANN agrees that when it determines to make a Required Change, ICANN will provide Registry Operator written notice of such Required Change, which notice shall specify the terms of the Required Change (a “Change Notice”). Registry Operator agrees that, following its receipt of a Change Notice, the Required Change related thereto will be immediately effective and binding on ICANN and Registry Operator, and shall be incorporated by reference into the Registry Agreement without any action of the parties. If requested by ICANN, Registry Operator shall execute an amendment to the Registry Agreement to reflect any Required Change. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of a Change Notice, Registry Operator may terminate the Registry Agreement upon five (5) calendar days written notice to ICANN; provided, however, that Registry Operator may not terminate the Registry Agreement pursuant to this Section 1(c) following the first delegation of the TLD to nameservers designated by Registry Operator into the root-zone. Upon expiration of such thirty (30) calendar day period, Registry Operator may not thereafter terminate ...
Open Issues. 1.5 If a Notice of Disagreement has been received by the Buyer pursuant to paragraph 1.2 of this Schedule 3, the parties shall try to amicably resolve the issue. Should they fail to do so within twenty (20) Business Days of the end of the aforesaid objection period of forty-five (45) days (for the purpose of this Schedule the “Disagreement Date”) then any such unresolved issue (for the purpose of this Schedule the “Open Issues”) shall be submitted to and settled by an accountant of a firm of international repute and with sufficient and relevant expertise (for the purpose of this Schedule the “Accountant”) to be jointly appointed by the parties within fourteen (14) days of the Disagreement Date or, if the parties fail to agree on such appointment within that period, each party may make an application to the President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales to appoint the Accountant.
Open Issues. A comprehensive and consolidated list of all outstanding problems related to the Product installation, project or other development effort that are identified by MetroPCS and Supplier as remaining to be resolved.
Open Issues. 4-21 1.4 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 2-1: FEEDER NETWORK BUILDING BLOCKS........................................2-8 FIGURE 3-1: CENTRAL STATION RELEASE 1 - REDUNDANT CONFIGURATION..................3-16 FIGURE 3-2: CENTRAL STATION RELEASE 2 - REDUNDANT CONFIGURATION..................3-17 FIGURE 3-3: CSC BLOCK DIAGRAM....................................................3-18 FIGURE 3-4: TERMINAL STATION DIGITAL CARD (SIC)..................................3-19 TABLE 2-I: AIRSTAR AND FEEDER PRODUCT TERMINOLOGY.................................2-8 TABLE 3-1: TRAFFIC TRANSPORT FUNCTIONS............................................3-9 TABLE 3-2: TRAFFIC CAPACITY OPTIONS...............................................3-9 TABLE 3-3: RADIO SPECIFICATIONS (26 GHZ).........................................3-10 TABLE 3-4: RADIO SPECIFICATIONS (10 GHZ).........................................3-12 TABLE 3-5: TERMINAL STATION......................................................3-14
Open Issues. A group analysis of the previously expressed goals and definition raises an issue: [Open Issue 1] As a consequence of the [Def.22], we can assume for the short-term that the ESE element <unstored> can be used as requirement to support the [Goal 1] but it might not be sufficient to support with excellence the [Goal 3]. This raises an issue that should be presented to Europeana, for further discussion and eventual revision of ESE. Anyway, this issue is not a major constraint to the work to be developed in the initial phases of this project, so it is not considered impeditive. [Open Issue 2] Even if this project is focussed on a specific community of Data Providers, the Europeana Libraries, which are expected to hole mainly bibliographic Content, in this moment it is not clear how homogeneous will be Content provided by those entities and how appropriate is the actual [Def.8]. For example, Europeana considers finding aids as an acceptable Content from archives, which from the perspective of a library is a kind of Data closer to Metadata then to Content.
Open Issues. All the features highlighted in Chapter 3 have not yet been defined or fully defined. Other limitations have also been identified and will be investigated, and the architecture designed will be brushed up if needed. Open issues includes: • Asymmetric path selection; • Multiple routers: the ITS station may be connected to the outside word through mul- tiple ITS-S routers, for instance via a router providing 11p and 11n, and a nomadic device providing 3G connectivity; • Security and Privacy (use of pseudonyms); • Multicast: distribution of information to multiple nodes; • GeoMulticast: distribution of information to multiple nodes located in a given geo- graphical area (GeoArea). Readers are invited to follow the progress of the ITSSv6 project and to refer to deliverable D2.4 Final System Specification to be published in February 2014. CHAPTER 4 Path and flow management In this chapter, we describe procedures within the ITS station management entity (SME) to determine what are possible communication paths and to determine which flow should be routed to which communication path. The SME collects information from all the horizon- tal layers and gathers it into several databases. It then determines what are the available paths and issues routing policies to be applied to communication flows. These policies are transferred to the ITS station networking & transport layer (SNT).
Open Issues. 4-21 1.4 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 2-1: FEEDER NETWORK BUILDING BLOCKS........................................2-8 FIGURE 3-1: CENTRAL STATION RELEASE 1 - REDUNDANT CONFIGURATION..................3-16 FIGURE 3-2: CENTRAL STATION RELEASE 2 - REDUNDANT CONFIGURATION..................3-17 FIGURE 3-3: CSC BLOCK DIAGRAM....................................................3-18 FIGURE 3-4: TERMINAL STATION DIGITAL CARD (SIC)..................................3-19 [***] CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
Open Issues. 1. Hot Standby Switch time of [***] ms may not be feasible. However release 2 ill incorporate switch-over mechanism with average switch time [***] ms.
Open Issues. Notwithstanding the widespread acceptance of the Sxxxxx Bros. and Eastgroup analysis, three important issues remain unsettled: the importance of the traditional elements, what constitutes necessity for consolidation, what constitutes prejudice to an objecting creditor’s interests, and the relationship between creditor reliance and necessity. [ ], 2000 Page 24
