Numerical results Sample Clauses

Numerical results. To investigate the validity of the formulations presented in the previous sections for stress analysis of rotors, several illustrative examples including rotating disks with constant and variable thickness; and a complex rotor are analyzed in this section.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Numerical results. In this section we first consider a stock loan contract with an automatic ter- mination clause a (a ∈ [0, q]), r = 0.05, γ = 0.07, σ = 0.15, δ = 0.01, q = 100 and S 0 = 100. We will give six numerical examples to show that how the liquidity, optimal strategy b(a), initial value fa(x) and initial cash q − c depend on automatic termination clause a, respectively.
Numerical results. The calculated response from the acceleration measure- ments in the mine were given as vectors of node displace- ment vs. time. The adhesive stress loads between rock and shotcrete was calculated by use of the stiffness of the elastic springs in the model. The results from eight sets of measurement data are compiled in Figures 8–9. The adhesive stresses between shotcrete and rock, perpendicular to and parallel with the rock surface, are shown as one bar representing each measurement point, i.e. x = 4.5, 7.5, . . . ,
Numerical results. In this section we illustrate the effectiveness of using the W-GCV method in Lanczos-hybrid methods with Tikhonov regularization.
Numerical results. In this section we demonstrate that using HyBR to solve the regularized least squares problem at each Xxxxx-Xxxxxx iteration of the variable projection method can be beneficial to super-resolution and blind deconvolution imag- ing applications. More specifically, we show that one can achieve sufficient objective function and gradient norm decrease, as well as more accurate pa- rameter estimation, by using the HyBR method in a reduced Xxxxx-Xxxxxx framework. Furthermore, we illustrate that sufficient reconstructions can be computed without requiring a priori selection of a regularization parameter. Super-Resolution
Numerical results. ‌ In this part we investigate the PHYLS performance of FD and its HD counterpart in presence of both colluding and non-colluding EDs. The spatial density of the π small-cell BSs is set to be λ (d) = 4 per km2. The (per-user) BS and UE transmit powers are kept fixed at pd = 23 dBm and pu = 20 dBm, respectively. The noise spectral density at all receivers is −170 dBm/Hz and the total system bandwidth is W = 10 MHz. The MC simulations are obtained from 20 k trials in a circular region of radius 10 km. The results are taken over two resource blocks. In the FD small-cell network, the DL and UL run simultaneously, whereas in the HD small-cell network, the DL and UL occur over different resource blocks. Furthermore, in the FD system, we take into account different interference cancellation schemes. In particular, in the DL, we consider the cases with and without SIC capability at the UE side. More- over, in the UL, we capture the performance under different perfect SI cancellation and NLOS residual SI with a variance of −55 dB [5].‌
Numerical results. Fig. 3.2 illustrates the system's outage probability against the transmit power for all possible scenarios in a network setting with (a) = 2 and (b) = 3 relays. Our results are numerically optimized with respect to the power splitting parameters ij. We observe that our proposed protocol outperforms the conventional multi-hop model, where each node sends a signal only to its subsequent node through orthogonal channels. Further- more, the figure shows that an increase in the number of hops results in an improvement of the outage probability performance, with the cases of = 1 and = 2 revealing the most significant difference. In addition, it can be seen that as the number of hops increases the diversity gain is also improved, which complies with our analysis indicating a diver- sity order equal to . Finally, we can see that the theoretical values perfectly match to the simulation results and this observation validates the accuracy of our analysis.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Numerical results

  • MEDICAL REPORT The Agency/Department Head as a condition of granting sick leave with pay, may require medical evidence of sickness or injury acceptable to the Agency/Department. The acceptable medical evidence must be obtained from a medical practitioner currently treating the employee or the employee’s family member.

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Medical Records Medical records relating to Trial Subjects that are not submitted to Sponsor may include some of the same information as is included in Trial Data; however, Sponsor makes no claim of ownership to those documents or the information they contain. c.

  • Medical Reports The following applies to all employees: The Employer agrees to pay the fee for medical reports required by the Employer for Sick Leave or Weekly Indemnity provisions to a maximum of fifty dollars ($50.00).

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Technical Reports deliver to the Agent, and shall procure that the Manager shall deliver to the Agent, on request copies of the latest complete technical reports in respect of the Vessels.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Statistical Information Any third-party statistical and market-related data included in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are based on or derived from sources that the Company believes to be reliable and accurate in all material respects.

  • Technical References Technical References that describe the practices, procedures and specifications for certain services (and the applicable interfaces relating thereto) are listed on Schedule 2.3 (the “Technical Reference Schedule”) to assist the Parties in meeting their respective responsibilities hereunder.

  • Publication of Results The National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20112) requires NASA to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof. As such, NASA may publish unclassified and non-Proprietary Data resulting from work performed under this Agreement. The Parties will coordinate publication of results allowing a reasonable time to review and comment.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.