November 2001. In interpreting and implementing the rights and obligations under this Chapter, each Party shall ensure consistency with that Declaration.
November 2001. It expands the scope of application to non-international armed conflicts. The amended convention entered into force on 18 May 2004. Protocol I prohibits the use of weapons intended to injure by fragments which are not detectable in the human body by X-rays. Protocol II prohibits or restricts the use of mines, booby-traps and other devices. Amended Protocol II, which entered into force on 3 December 1998, reinforces the constraints regarding anti-personnel mines. Protocol III restricts the use of incendiary weapons. Protocol IV, which entered into force on 30 July 1998, prohibits the employ- ment of laser weapons specifically designed to cause permanent blindness to unenhanced vision. Protocol V, which entered into force on 12 November 2006, recognizes the need for measures of a generic nature to minimize the risks and effects of explosive remnants of war. Parties to the original convention and protocols (119): Albania, Antigua and Barbuda1, Argentina*, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Benin2, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi4, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada*, Chile2, China*, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus*, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia2, Finland, France*, Gabon2, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Holy See*, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iraq, Ireland, Israel*1, Italy*, Jamaica2, Japan, Jordan2, Kazakhstan2, Korea (South)3, Kuwait2, Laos, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania2, Luxembourg, Macedonia (Former Yugoslav Republic of), Madagascar, Maldives2, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco3, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco4, Nauru, Netherlands*, New Zealand, Nicaragua2, Niger, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru2, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar2, Romania*, Russia, Saint Xxxxxxx and the Grenadines1, Saudi Arabia2, Senegal5, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone2, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey*3, Turkmenistan1, Uganda, UK*, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates2, Uruguay, USA*, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Zambia * With reservation and/or declaration. 1 Party only to 1981 protocols I and II. 2 Party only to 1981 protocols I and III. 3 Party only to 1981 Protocol I. 4 Party only to 1981 Protocol II. 5 Party only to 1981 Protocol III. Signed but not ratified the original convention and protocols (5): Afghanist...
November 2001. 2. The Parties shall respect the Decision of the WTO General Council of 30 August 2003 on paragraph 6 of the declaration referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall contribute to its implementation.
November 2001. 102.84431910 April 2004........ 121.01134530 September 2006.... 142.
November 2001. Comment: It stipulates that any investor-state dispute involving the amount of compensation may be submitted to ad hoc arbitral tribunal if they cannot be settled through negotiation within a year. With regard to the standards of treatment, apart from fair and equitable treatment, for China it stipulates that investment shall be accorded most favoured nation treatment, whilst for Syria it requires that investment shall be accorded national treatment, which is different from the second Model BIT. Agreement Between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments The Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties), Intending to create favorable conditions for investments by investors of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party; Recognizing that the reciprocal encouragement, promotion and protection of such investments will be conducive to stimulating business initiative of the investors and will increase prosperity in both States; Desiring to intensify thd economic cooperation of both States on the basis of equality and mutual benefits; Have agreed as follows:
November 2001. The Convention and the Aviation Protocol are read and interpreted together as a single document as required by Article 6(1) of the Convention and reference to the Convention in this opinion includes the Aviation Protocol. In this opinion, references are made to the Articles of the Consolidated Text which is a combination of the Convention and the Aviation Protocol authorised and created pursuant to Resolution No. 1 of the Diplomatic Conference to Adopt a Mobile Equipment Convention and an Aircraft Protocol. References to “Irish law” include the Convention as enacted into Irish law by the International Interests in Mobile Equipment (Cape Town Convention) Act, 2005. Terms used in this opinion in respect of the Convention (whether or not capitalised) and not otherwise defined in this opinion shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Consolidated Text or the Regulations issued by the Supervisory Authority for the International Registry pursuant to Article 27 of the Consolidated Text (the Regulations).
November 2001. 1. We recognize the gravity of the public health problems afflicting many developing and least- developed countries, especially those resulting from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other epidemics.
November 2001. If you wish to vote on the question of membership of the Credifors' Commiffee, you must either attend the meeting of creditors relevant to you in person, or complete the section of the proxy form authorising your proxy to vote on this point at his discretion. It will not be possible to instruct your proxy to vote for a particular nominee, since nominations can be made until two working days before the meetings of creditors to vote on the Sgheme, and the final list of nominees will therefore only be available at the meetings. Valuing Vofes For the purpose of valuing votes all claims will be converted, where necessary, into US Dollars at the mid- market rate of exchange quoted by the Royal Bank of Scotland plc at close of business on 3 December 2001. †he amount of a claim admitted for voting purposes does not constitute an admission of the existence or amount of any liability of the Company and will not bind the )oinf Sgheme Adminisfrafors, the Company, or Sgheme Credifors. †he value of a claim for voting purposes will be taken net of any applicable Segurify, set-off or cross claim. †he Chairman of the meeting of creditors to consider and vote on the Sgheme may, for voting purposes only, reject a claim in whole or in part, if he considers that it does not constitute a fair and reasonable assessment of the sums owed to the relevant creditor by the Company. †he chairman’s decision is final and binding. He will, however, advise the creditor of his decision, prior to the meeting where possible, and in any event, afterwards. †he )oinf Provisional Liquidafors have been advised that particulars as to estimates of the amount of any future claims furnished by a creditor for voting purposes may not be protected by privilege under English or United States law and may be discoverable by a third party with a claim against the creditor in any action or proceedings to which the creditor may be party. However, each creditor should consult his own legal adviser as to the consequences of furnishing such particulars in the event of any litigation in which he may be, or may become, involved. Dogumenfs Available For Inspegfion †he documents listed in Appendix 2 are available for inspection between the hours of 10am and 4pm on any Worhing Day until 4pm on 3 December 2001 at the following locations: PricewaterhouseCoopers, Plumtree Court, London EC4A 4H† (ref PC240/NR) DLA, 0 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, XX0X 0XX (Ref EB/NM) [†HIS PAGE LEF† BLANK IN†EN†IONALLT] EVPLANATORY STATEMENT PART...
November 2001. Practical examples of using the CSWD element codes and the flexibility that would be gained through the use of the fourth character in the element field and the use of the user definable field was discussed in particular. It was noted that Planning Department use a lot of customisation for its CAD work, which although this maximises the use of the CAD software, does create additional problems when exchanging the customised data.
November 2001. Through COSCO Marine Engineering (Singapore) Pte Ltd, the Group acquIred COSCO Engineering Pte Ltd for a consIderatIon of S$2 to strengthen Its standIng In provIdIng marIne engIneerIng servIces. FUTURE PROSPECTS WIth the management revIval spIrIt, COSCO Investment Is set for a challengIng 2002. The shIppIng arena may be dIffIcult due to the September 11 terrorIst attacks and the depressed freIght rates. However, COSCO Investment Is posItIoned through restructurIng to take advantage of Greater ChIna as she entered WTO last November. COSCO Investment wIll contInuously stay In Its core busInesses, I.e. the marIne and the marIne related busInesses. We wIll also explore avaIlable new busIness oppor- tunItIes In Greater ChIna and the regIon, and restructure to Improve the wealth of all shareholders. As hIghlIghted, COSCO Investment wIll contInue to focus on expandIng marIne and marIne related busInesses and Is explorIng the dIsposal of non- core busInesses In due course when favourable condItIons arIse. DespIte the current unfavourable economIc clImate, the Group Is well posItIoned to take advantage of the above developments and to further expand Its busIness. We have great confIdence that the Group’s performance In 2002 wIll be maIntaIned. On behalf of the management, I would lIke to take thIs opportunIty to thank all the shareholders, customers and frIends for theIr trust and support. We sIncerely contInue our efforts to maxImIze the returns to all shareholders wIthout compromIsIng our qualIty servIces to our customers. PresIdent XX XXX XXXXX
