North West Planning Advisory Committee Sample Clauses

North West Planning Advisory Committee. At its meeting on January 6, 2021, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved, with consideration given to retaining as many trees as possible on the site. A memorandum from the PAC to North West Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On June 1, 2016, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved. In response to concerns raised by the PAC, the development agreement limits the number of residents and staff.
Sample 1Sample 2
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On April 6, 2022, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved with consideration given to reviewing the location of the driveway and installing traffic lights at the intersection of Windgate Drive and Beaver Bank Road. The location of the driveway shown at Schedule B of the proposed development agreement was reviewed by HRM Development Engineering and meets both the minimum and turning sight distance as required under HRM’s Municipal Design Guidelines (2013). Off-site benefits such as installation of traffic lights at the intersection of Windgate Drive and Beaver Bank Road are beyond the consideration of the proposed development agreement. It should be noted that this application was reviewed by the PAC in advance of changes to the Halifax Regional Municipality Charter in April which prohibited Council from seeking the recommendations of this committee prior to deciding on a planning application. New applications received today would not be considered by the PAC.
Sample 1
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On May 27, 2020, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be refused due to traffic impacts, loss of vegetation, impact on adjacent areas and overall compatibility with the existing neighborhood. In response to the comments from PAC, the applicant revised the proposal to reduce the number of surface parking spots from 25 to 14, increasing the amount of open space and protecting existing vegetation. increasing the amount of open space and protecting existing vegetation by providing a larger lawn. Many of the trees that the public was concerned about losing are located on an adjacent property but, increasing the green space around them will reduce the risk that construction related disturbances will affect the trees. A report from the PAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
Sample 1
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On February 2, 2022, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended the application be approved subject to consideration of traffic mitigation, exterior design, duration of time extensions, and access to the parking garage. It should be noted that this recommendation was provided to Community Council in advance of changes to the HRM Charter. These changes, passed in April 2022, legislated that decisions on Planning matters may not be referred to a planning advisory committee for a recommendation prior to Community Council's decision on the matter. The proposed amending development agreement addresses some of PAC’s concerns, including exterior design improvements. The applicant continues to request an eight (8) year time extension because the size of the project is large, consisting of two multiple unit buildings. In the traffic impact statement Case 22691: Amending Development Agreement 0 Xxxxxx Xxx., Lower Sackville Community Council Report - 4 - November 21, 2022 submitted by the applicant, the traffic engineer required that one of the driveway accesses at Old Sackville Road be restricted to right-in / right-out traffic movements to and from the ground level parking lot due to limited visibility. The second driveway access to the underground parking lot was recommended to remain with no restrictions as it is an existing access with good visibility. HRM Engineering reviewed the traffic impact study and did not raise concerns. A report from the PAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
Sample 1
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On May 3, 2017, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that North West Community Council reject the application due to traffic concerns due to a busy intersection on Duke and Damascus and second entrance on Duke Street, environmental impact of infilling the wetland, and concerns over the role of Halifax Water in the ownership and maintenance of the hydro storage water and/or drainage technology. Regional Waters Advisory Board On April 12, 2017, the Regional Waters Advisory Board (RWAB) recommended that the application be approved subject to best management construction and sediment control practices being followed by the developer to minimize any negative impacts to the wetland noting that a redesigned buffer enhances the ecological functions of the area, encourages ground water recharge and creates a viable riparian habitat.
Sample 1
North West Planning Advisory Committee. The North West Planning Advisory Committee (NWPAC) reviewed this development application at their April 2, 2014 meeting. Staff advise that matters raised by the Committee have been reasonably addressed through amendments since made to the proposal and/or are addressed through the standard HRM permitting process. Specific questions were posed with regard to vehicle access and egress to the site given concern for existing levels of traffic on Sackville Drive. In assessing the traffic impact statement submitted with this application, Engineering and Traffic staff have determined that no limitations on turning movements in and out of the site are warranted at this point. However, these movements will be analysed as the street continues to redevelop, and adjustments can be taken in the future if so warranted. A report from the NWPAC will be provided to Community Council under separate cover.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On September 1, 2021, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved with consideration given to excluding a recycling depot as a permitted use under the development agreement. The proposed amending development agreement does not permit recycling depots on the subject lands. A report from the NWPAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
Sample 1

Related to North West Planning Advisory Committee

  • JOINT LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18.01 A Joint Labour Management Committee shall be established to attend to those matters which are of mutual interest. To ensure its effectiveness the Committee shall be separate and apart from the grievance procedure.

  • Labour Management Committee (a) Where the parties mutually agree that there are matters of mutual concern and interest that would be beneficial if discussed at a Labour-Management Committee Meeting during the term of this Agreement, the following shall apply.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Staffing Committee A. Responsibilities. The Nurse Staffing Committee (“NSC”) shall be responsible for determining the Institute’s staffing plan and resolving complaints raised by nurses regarding the implementation of the plan as well as those activities required of it under RCW 70.41, et seq and its successors.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 33.01 (a) An Employee-Management Advisory Committee (EMAC) shall be established within three (3) months of the signing of the Collective Agreement. The Union Representative shall provide the names of up to three (3) elected Employees and the Employer shall provide the names of up to three (3) appointed representatives to sit on the EMAC.

  • Benefits Advisory Committee The Board agrees to establish a Benefits Advisory Committee to provide stakeholder input into maintaining quality and affordable benefits. The focus of this committee shall be to:

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 5.01 A Joint Advisory Committee shall operate during the term of this agreement consisting of one (1) employee representative from each location and up to an equal number of employer representatives who shall meet at least once every six (6) months to discuss working conditions, economy of operation, quality and quantity of service, safety and health, workplace stress, violence and abuse prevention, and other matters to promote an ongoing harmonious relationship between the Employer and its employees. The Joint Advisory Committee shall meet at the request of either party. The full-time Union Representative may attend said meetings. All time spent attending Joint Advisory Committee meetings by employees shall be considered time worked but time spent at “pre-meetings” will not be considered time worked.

  • FISCAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Recognizing the value of Union input on behalf of employees, the parties agree to the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.