North Atlantic Treaty Sample Clauses

North Atlantic Treaty. Accession of Romania Protocol signed at Brussels March 26, 2003; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate April 10, 2003 (Treaty Doc. 108-4, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations April 30, 2003 (Senate Executive Report No. 108-6, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate May 8, 2003; Ratified by the President February 25, 2004;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
North Atlantic Treaty. Accession of Latvia Protocol signed at Brussels March 26, 2003; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate April 10, 2003 (Treaty Doc. 108-4, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations April 30, 2003 (Senate Executive Report No. 108-6, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate May 8, 2003; Ratified by the President February 25, 2004;
North Atlantic Treaty. Accession of Slovenia Protocol signed at Brussels March 26, 2003; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate April 10, 2003 (Treaty Doc. 108-4, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations April 30, 2003 (Senate Executive Report No. 108-6, 108th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate May 8, 2003; Ratified by the President February 25, 2004;
North Atlantic Treaty. Accession of Hungary Protocol signed at Brussels December 16, 1997; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate February 11, 1998 (Treaty Doc. 105-36, 105th Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations March 3, 1998 (Senate Executive Report No. 105-14, 105th Congress, 2d Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate April 30, 1998; Ratified by the President May 21, 1998;
North Atlantic Treaty. Accession of Poland Protocol signed at Brussels December 16, 1997; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate February 11, 1998 (Treaty Doc. 105-36, 105th Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations March 3, 1998 (Senate Executive Report No. 105-14, 105th Congress, 2d Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate April 30, 1998; Ratified by the President May 21, 1998;
North Atlantic Treaty. Article 1 The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
North Atlantic Treaty. Treaties and other international agreements of the Xxxxxx Xxxxxx xx Xxxxxxx 0000-0000 Volume 4, Multilateral 1946-49 Washington, D.C.: Department of State. p. 831. XXXX 00000000. OCLC 6940. May 2013. ^ NATO declassified - signatories to the Treaty. Nato. ^ a b c d e f xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx: Turkey calls for an emergency NATO meeting to discuss Isil and the PKK, 26 XXXX.xxx. Date: 31 March 2014 Since the founding of the Alliance in 1949, Article 4 of the Turkey has on two occasions in 2012 requested the convening of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) under Article 4: once on 22 June after one of its warplanes shot down Syrian air defence forces, and the second time on October 3rd when Syrian shells killed five Turkish civilians Earlier, on January 10th, Turkey agreed to join the 2008-2020 ^ Refugees reach the Greek border as the EU demands that Turkey honour its migration commitments. xxxxxxxx.xxx February 2020, 28 February 2020 The emergency meeting, held in Brussels on Friday morning, was held under Article 4 of NATO's founding treaty, which allows any ally to request consultations if it considers its territorial integrity, political independence or security at risk. ^ UNSC, EU, NATO will hold emergency meetings around Xxxxxxx. Xxxxx 0, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx and Latvia have called on the North Atlantic Council, nato's decision-making body, to hold an emergency session on Ukraine, citing security concerns,, Xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx ^ Xxxx, Xxxx (March 1, 2014). Russia's seizure of Crimea makes the former Soviet states nervous. Atlantic. Date: 31 March 2014 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Lithuania's foreign minister, responded on Saturday by invoking Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty only the fourth time in the history of the alliance. ^ Xxxxx, Xxxxx (3 March 2014). Top Russians face U.S. sanctions over Crimea crisis The New York Times. On March 31, 2014, NATO called its second emergency meeting on Ukraine in response to Poland's request under Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty Treaty concerning threats to the security and independence of a Member State. ^ Xxxx, Xxxx (27 July 2015). Turkey is calling for rare NATO talks following attacks along the Syrian border. CNN's July 2015 ^ a b xxxxxxx.xxx: Turkey and the US plan to create a Syrian Safe Zone without July 27th. C 2015 . AFTER THE ATTACK: ALLIANCE; NATO is calling for a joint defence pact with the US for the first time. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 May 2017 ^ NATO update: Article 5 invocation confirmed - 2. Xxxx...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
North Atlantic Treaty. Protocol amending the Security Annex to the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty for Co-operation regarding Atomic Information. Done at Brussels June 2, 1998.

Related to North Atlantic Treaty

  • Special and Differential Treatment for the Newer Asean Member States In order to increase the benefits of this Agreement for the newer ASEAN Member States, and in accordance with the objectives and principles set out in the Preamble and Articles 1 (Objective) and 2 (Guiding Principles), Member States recognise the importance of according special and differential treatment to the newer ASEAN Member States, through:

  • National Treatment and Most-favoured-nation Treatment (1) Each Contracting Party shall accord to investments of investors of the other Contracting Party, treatment which shall not be less favourable than that accorded either to investments of its own or investments of investors of any third State.

  • National Treatment and Most Favoured Nation 1. For all matters relating to the treatment of investments of investors of either Contracting Party shall enjoy, in the territory of the other party, of national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment.

  • Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise Compliance Award of this Contract was based, in part, on the Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise (“IVOSB”) participation plan, as detailed in the IVOSB Subcontractor Commitment Form, commonly referred to as “Attachment A-1” in the procurement documentation and incorporated by reference herein. Therefore, any changes to this information during the Contract term must be approved by IDOA’s IVOSB Division (“IVOSB Division”) and may require an amendment. It is the State’s expectation that the Contractor will meet the subcontractor commitments during the Contract term. The following certified IVOSB subcontractor(s) will be participating in this Contract: [Add additional IVOSBs using the same format.] IVOSB COMPANY NAME PHONE EMAIL OF CONTACT PERSON PERCENT Briefly describe the IVOSB service(s)/product(s) to be provided under this Contract and include the estimated date(s) for utilization during the Contract term: A copy of each subcontractor agreement must be submitted to the IVOSB Division within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Contract. The subcontractor agreements may be uploaded into Pay Audit (Indiana’s subcontractor payment auditing system), emailed to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx, or mailed to IDOA, 000 X. Xxxxxxxxxx Street, Room W-478, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Failure to provide a copy of any subcontractor agreement may be deemed a violation of the rules governing IVOSB procurement and may result in sanctions allowable under 25 IAC 9-5-2. Requests for changes must be submitted to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx for review and approval before changing the participation plan submitted in connection with this Contract. The Contractor shall report payments made to certified IVOSB subcontractors under this Contract on a monthly basis using Pay Audit. The Contractor shall notify subcontractors that they must confirm payments received from the Contractor in Pay Audit. The Pay Audit system can be accessed on the IDOA webpage at: xxx.xx.xxx/xxxx/xxxx/xxxxxxxx.xxx. The Contractor may also be required to report IVOSB certified subcontractor payments directly to the IVOSB Division, as reasonably requested and in the format required by the IVOSB Division. The Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions in this clause may be considered a material breach of the Contract.

  • Protection, Treatment (1) Each Contracting Party shall protect within its State territory investments made in accordance with its national laws and regulations by investors of the other Contracting Party and shall not impair by unreasonable or discriminatory measures the management, maintenance, use, enjoyment, extension, sale or liquidation of such investments. In particular, each Contracting Party or its competent authorities shall issue the necessary authorisations mentioned in Article 2, paragraph (2) of this Agreement.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING BOYCOTTING CERTAIN ENERGY COMPANIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this contract has a value of $100,000 or more that is to be paid wholly or partly from public funds, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 13 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or any wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company, or affiliate of these entities or business associations, if any, does not boycott energy companies and will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract. For purposes of this contract, the term “company” shall mean an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, that exists to make a profit. The term “boycott energy company” shall mean “without an ordinary business purpose, refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with a company because the company (a) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy and does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law, or (b) does business with a company described by paragraph (a).” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 809.001(1).

  • INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC 1. Profits from the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic shall be taxable only in the Contracting State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated.

  • Kesimpulan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) merupakan bentuk kerjasama ekonomi bilateral antara Indonesia xxx Jepang yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan impor, ekspor xxx investasi di kedua negara. Kerangka perjanjian ini meliputi liberalisasi perdagangan, investasi, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual, transparansi, anti-persaingan, memperdalam kerja xxxx, xxx menetapkan prosedur untuk menegakkan perjanjian. Perjanjian ini terjalin dilandasi oleh kepentingan nasional masing-masing negara. Adapun kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxx mengoptimalkan kerjasama antara Indonesia-Jepang, mendapat kepastian akses pasar di Jepang yang lebih luas berkat penurunan tarif, meningkatkan arus barang xxx xxxx, mendapatkan transfer teknologi, sebagai sektor penggerak, program kesejahteraan, xxx juga menjadi pusat pengembangan manufaktur. General Review semestinya diadakan lima tahun setelah dilaksanakannya perjanjian. namun Jepang menunda pelaksanaan kegiatan ini sampai diubahnya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan yang diklaim tidak sesuai dengan IJEPA. Padahal sebelumnya Indonesia sudah menawarkan Jepang agar memberi usulan terkait peraturan ini sebelum diterbitkan. Indonesia masih mengejar kepentingannya untuk memenuhi perundingan ulang terkait tarif bea masuk xxx tarif impor yang belum terlaksana secara efektif. Selain berkenaan tentang kepentingan nasional, Indonesia sebenarnya juga tidak menetapkan tujuan yang jelas yang akan dicapai dalam kerjasama ekonomi ini. Diplomasi ekonomi yang diupayakan indonesia dalam kerjasama ekonomi bilateral ini didasari oleh beberapa faktor seperti latar belakang sejarah, hubungan perdagangan xxxx xxxxxx menguntungkan, xxx juga kemajuan perekonomian Jepang. Indonesia juga bergantung kepada situasi ekonomi Jepang karena kegiatan impor,ekspor, xxx investasi yang berlangsung memberi dampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia dilihat dari nilai perdagangan yang terus mengalami tren kenaikan. Meskipun menguntungkan,Indonesia harus terus bersikap tegas dalam melaksanakan perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxxx banyak kepentingan nasional dari kerjasama bilateral ini yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap kendala yang tidak kondusif bagi Indonesia dalam tinjauan umum IJEPA. Indonesia akan melanjutkan upayanya untuk mewujudkan kepentingan nasionalnya melalui kerja sama ini. Kerja sama ini diharapkan dapat terus meningkatkan hubungan baik perekonomian antara Indonesia-Jepang. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anggraeni, N. A. (2020). DIPLOMASI EKONOMI JEPANG DALAM UPAYA PERPINDAHAN LIMBAH B3 MELALUI INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 156-172. Ardiyanti, S. T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia - Jepang (Ijepa) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 9(2), 129–151. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.30908/bilp.v9i2. 5 Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2017). Posisi Indonesia di Tengah Fenomena Korporasi Global (Studi Kasus: Relasi Dagang Indonesia – Toyota Pasca Kesepakatan IJEPA). Indonesian Perspective, 2(2), 105. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.14710/ip.v2i2.18 474 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Peningkatan Investasi Jepang di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Kerja IJEPA 208-2018. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Gocklas C.S, L., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (Studi Pada Badan Pusat Statistik 2000-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol, 50(5), 191–200. xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/media/pub lications/188892-ID-analisis- pengaruh-indonesia-japan- econom.pdf Hadi, S. (2014). Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: an Indonesian Perspective. East Asian Policy, 06(03), 114–128. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1142/s17939305 14000312 Harahap, I. K., & Xxxxxx, A. M. (2015). DAMPAK PENERAPAN INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TERHADAP EKSPOR INDONESIA KE JEPANG. Media Ekonomi, 23(1), 27. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.25105/me.v23i1. 0000 Xxxxxx, X. S. (2016). KEGAGALAN INDONESIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI INDONESIAN JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal Lyceum, 4(1), 430–439. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Analisis Review Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dalam Perdagangan Barang. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1108/eb057810

  • National Treatment and Most-favoured-nation Provisions (1) Neither Contracting Party shall in its territory subject investments or returns of nationals or companies of the other Contracting Party to treatment less favourable than that which it accords to investments or returns of its own nationals or companies or to investments or returns of nationals or companies of any third State.

  • CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment - Continued If you answered "No, Vendor does not certify - Lobbying to Report" to the above attribute question, you must download, read, execute, and upload the attachment entitled "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL", as instructed, to report the lobbying activities you performed or paid others to perform. 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Federal Rule Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (Contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000) Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members requires the proposer certify that in performance of the contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $250,000, the vendor will be in compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). Does vendor certify compliance? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.