N N N Sample Clauses

N N N. Replaces (aN , bN ) with (a+ , b+ ) N N Stores session key kS kS = h(idN , rN , fN , xN ) Stores session key kS Fig. 2: Xx et al.’s Protocol suitable for WBAN deployment. Very recently, Xx et al. [7] presented an authenticated key agreement scheme suitable for WBANs based only upon symmetric cryptographic primitives. This is an attractive proposal, since there is no requirement of any additional infrastructure, and the associated computation and communication overheads are negligible. The authors claim that this scheme achieves almost all of the security and privacy objectives defined in Section II-B.

N N N. In order to construct the financial industry chain to congregate two inequalities for Pareto improvement, so TQ (L,t) = N (L,t) + (h −1)SQ (L,t) .

N N N. Replaces (aN , bN ) with (a+, b+) N N Stores session key kS kS = h(idN , rN , fN , xN ) Stores session key kS Fig. 2: Xx et al.’s Protocol

N N N. Case 2. In the case when the in-degree of the root node is three, the group is composed of three subgroups G1, G2, G3 under three nodes 1, 2, 3. Suppose that the subgroup key for Gi (i=1,2,3) is KG , then K(3, KG , KG , KG ) =

N N N where (a) results from the security condition, (b) from the

N N N. With the same approaches, we have NI(X2;Y3|X1) ≥ (b) . N N N 2,Q 2,Q 3,Q 1 (c) 1 . N N N 1 . N N ΣN ≤ H(K1|S , X , Y )− H(K1|S , X , S , Y )+ ε1 +ε ΣN N N i−1 N i−1 N |S ) N (d) 1 2 2 3 N N N N N 1 2 2 3 3 N N N N N = i=1 I(K1, X1 , S3,i+1,S1,1 , K2, X2 , S3,1 , S2,i+1; S1,i, S2,i ΣN