Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that the Agreements were negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between parties of equal bargaining power and was drafted jointly by counsel for each Party. Accordingly, the Agreements are incorporated herein by reference and shall be mutually interpreted and not construed in favor of or against any Party, except as expressly provided for in the Agreements.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Settlement Agreement was negotiated on an “arms-length” basis between parties of equal bargaining power. Also, the Settlement Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and counsel for City. Accordingly, this Settlement Agreement shall be neutral, and no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated on an “arm’s-length” basis between parties of equal bargaining power. This Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and counsel for the Defendants. Accordingly, this Agreement is not one of adhesion, is mutually created, and no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. Plaintiff and Class Counsel acknowledge but do not concede to or agree with Defendants’ statements regarding the merits of the claims, and Defendants acknowledge, but do not concede to or agree with Plaintiff’s statements regarding the merits of the claims.
Mutual Interpretation. A. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated on an arm’s- length basis between parties of equal bargaining power. This Agreement has been drafted jointly by counsel for each of the Parties. Accordingly, this Agreement shall be mutually interpreted and not construed in favor of or against any of the Parties.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between Parties of equal bargaining power. Also, the Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and counsel for Citizens. Accordingly, no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. Plaintiff acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Citizens’ statements regarding the merits of the claims, and Citizens acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Plaintiff’s statements regarding the merits of the claims.
Mutual Interpretation. 143. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated at arms’ length between parties of equal bargaining power. This Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and Xxxx Xxx’x Counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement shall be neutral, and no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. 4/19/2022 Exhibit 1 Claim Form
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between Parties of equal bargaining power. Also, the Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and counsel for Cenlar. Accordingly, no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. Plaintiff acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Cenlar’s statements regarding the merits of the claims, and Cenlar acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Plaintiff’s statements regarding the merits of the claims.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that the Settlement was negotiated on an “arm’s-length” basis between parties of equal bargaining power. Class Counsel and Defendants’ counsel have drafted the Agreement jointly. Accordingly, this Agreement is not Electronically Filed - City of St. Louis - March 28, 2019 - 04:22 PM one of adhesion, is mutually created, and no ambiguity shall be strictly construed in favor of or against any of the Parties.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that this Agreement was negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between Parties of equal bargaining power. Also, the Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and counsel for Target. Accordingly, no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. Plaintiff acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Target’s statements regarding the merits of the claims, and Target acknowledges, but does not concede or agree with, Plaintiff’s statements regarding the merits of the claims.
Mutual Interpretation. The Parties agree and stipulate that the Settlement was negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between parties of equal bargaining power. The Agreement has been drafted jointly by Class Counsel and Defendant’s counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement is not one of adhesion, is mutually created, and no ambiguity shall be construed in favor of or against any of the Parties. The Settlement Class acknowledges, but does not concede to or agree with, statements by Defendant regarding the merits of the claims or class certification and Defendant acknowledges, but does not concede to or agree with, the Settlement Class’ statements regarding the merits of the claims or class certification.
