Mutual Accountability. The District and External Operator will maintain open and honest communication and continue to work together through the Executive Action Team to share progress updates and take responsibility resolve any impediments to implementation.
Mutual Accountability. The approach to mutual accountability affects the way that EPA and MPCA interact and is a change from EPA’s traditional approach to oversight. EPA and MPCA will agree on the appropriate level of EPA oversight of State program implementation. One primary consideration will be those program areas that are deemed to “need improvement.” However, EPA will continue to review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact State authorization or where federal statute or regulation requires EPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
Mutual Accountability. The G8 members, the Government of Nigeria, and the private sector intend to review their collective performance under this document through an annual review process to be conducted jointly. These participants intend, in particular, to review progress toward jointly determined objectives on the basis of jointly determined benchmarks in contributing to the fulfillment of Nigeria's Agricultural Transformation Agenda. Agreed upon objectives include: (1) progress towards achieving wealth creation target through job creation; (2) G8 member commitments to align their agricultural investments to the Government of Nigeria’s ATA; (3) Government of Nigeria's progress in implementing its policy commitments and consulting with private-sector investors; and (4) the investment commitments of private-sector investors. The review will also take account of the shared responsibilities related to the Voluntary Guidelines and the rai.
Mutual Accountability. [PSR, appendix 6 b (c)] Leaders agree that they will demonstrate mutual accountability by doing the following:
Mutual Accountability. Mutual accountability means that at each level of decision-making there are stated goals for planning, clear criteria for evaluation, mutually accepted measures of performance and easy access to appeals and reconsideration. This approach emphasizes the importance of coordinating planning, recruiting, hiring, tenure, promotion, merit, assessment and program evaluation. It is accomplished by the following:
Mutual Accountability. The approach from direct oversight to mutual accountability and joint assessment is a shift from the traditional approach. Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 will jointly assess each program element and determine the appropriate course change, as needed. USEPA R5 will review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact Ohio’s authorization or where Federal statute or regulation requires USEPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
Mutual Accountability. The approach from direct oversight to mutual accountability and joint assessment is a shift from the traditional approach. IDEM and USEPA R5 will jointly assess each program element and determine the appropriate course change, as needed. USEPA R5 will review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact Indiana’s authorization or where Federal statute or regulation requires USEPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
