Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the Sub-Recipient under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the Sub-Recipient via telephone, in writing, or an on- site visit. The primary, secondary, or signatory of the contract must be available for any on-site programmatic monitoring visit. The AAAPP reserves the right to conduct an on-site visit unannounced by persons duly authorized by the AAAPP. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The Sub-Recipient agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The AAAPP may use, but is not limited to, one or more of the following methods for monitoring:
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. AGENCY will be monitored by THE PARTNERSHIP through review of deliverables submitted per the schedule outlined herein. Programmatic monitoring of the contract will be conducted annually either by on-site visit or by desk review of the contract, invoices and/or reports. THE PARTNERSHIP may review records, including patient records, that support the information contained on reports submitted and/or interview employees, to assure the satisfactory performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology a) By execution of this subcontract the Provider hereby acknowledges and agrees that its performance under the subcontract shall meet the standards and be bound by the conditions set forth herein. If the Provider fails to meet these standards, the Network, at its exclusive option, may allow up to three (3) months for the Provider to achieve compliance with the standards. If the Network affords the Provider an opportunity to achieve compliance, and the Provider fails to achieve compliance within the specified time frame, the Network will terminate the subcontract in the absence of any extenuating and mitigating circumstances. The determination of extenuating or mitigating circumstances is the exclusive right of the Network.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The Agency will review and evaluate the performance of the Contractor under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the Contractor through telephone, in writing, and/or on-site visit(s). The primary, secondary, or signatory of the contract must be available for any on-site programmatic monitoring visit. The Agency’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The Contractor agrees to cooperate with the Agency in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The Agency may use, but is not limited to, one or more of the following methods for monitoring:
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. 1. By execution of this contract, the subrecipient hereby acknowledges and agrees that its performance under the contract must meet the standards set forth in this contract and will be bound by its conditions. If the subrecipient fails to meet the terms of this contract, the Coalition will notify the subrecipient in writing of the specific performance failures and may require the subrecipient to respond to the performance failures by developing a corrective action plan that is mutually agreed upon by the Coalition and subrecipient. In the event a mutual agreement cannot be reached, the Coalition will have final determination of the corrective action plan requiring conformance with the contract. If the subrecipient fails to achieve compliance with the corrective action plan, the Coalition has the authority to terminate the contract for cause in the absence of any extenuating or mitigating circumstances. The determination of extenuating or mitigating circumstances is the exclusive determination of the Coalition.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the sub-recipient under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the sub- recipient through telephone, in writing, or an on-site visit. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The sub-recipient agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP/DOEA in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the vendor under the terms of this agreement. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the vendor through telephone, desk review, or an on-site visit. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The vendor agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The vendor will permit persons duly authorized by the AAAPP/DOEA to inspect and copy any records, papers, documents, facilities, goods and services of the vendor which are relevant to this agreement, and to interview any clients, employees and vendor employees of the vendor to assure the AAAPP/DOEA of the satisfactory performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement. Following such review, the AAAPP/DOEA will deliver to the vendor a written report of its findings and request for development, by the vendor, of a corrective action plan where appropriate. The vendor hereby agrees to timely correct all deficiencies identified in the corrective action plan. Client signatures verifying billed services, timesheets, service logs, service delivery verification and evidence of background screening compliance must also be available during annual onsite or desk review monitoring conducted by the AAAPP.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The Sub-Recipient shall monitor its performance under this contract, as well as that of its subcontractors, subrecipients and consultants who are paid from funds provided under this contract, to ensure that the scope of work is accomplished within the specified time periods and budgets set and that other performance goals stated in this contract are achieved. Such review shall be made for each function or activity set forth in this contract and reported in the monthly client service report.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The department shall monitor performance of the provider by review of the deliverables and by attending at least one of the sampling events to observe if sampling procedures outlined in the QAPP are followed. Any observed shortcomings shall be noted to and resolved by the provider.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. Throughout the life of the program, the linkage between inputs, outputs and outcomes will be closely monitored and evaluated through the creation and application of logging and recording tools, and through regular documentation of program activities. This will be carried out on an ongoing basis. Data collected will provide descriptions of the implemented activities and key demographic variables such as numbers, geographic location, and background information of beneficiaries (age, sex, role in community, etc.). While SSP, in collaboration with its various M&E partners described above, will take responsibility for overall design and analysis, SSP will rely primarily on coordinated fieldwork operations to collect data, for example at schools and in classrooms. Indicators The SSP Program Performance Monitoring methodology seeks to identify the most relevant indicators to demonstrate program inputs, outputs and outcomes while also making the most economical, efficient, and sustainable use of program resources and time. This is especially important because parts of the monitoring and evaluation system will be inherited by the MoEHE and will be implemented across a number of departments once the SSP Program has ended. Indicators listed in this document include both output and outcome indicators. Many of these will be based on data that relevant departments of the MoEHE will collect. The M&E Department will lead the process of monitoring progress toward targets and provide regular feedback to relevant stakeholders as appropriate, using the indicators defined in this plan and in full cooperation with departments in the MoEHE that are collecting data for SSP. As certain indicators may be based on needs assessments that have not yet taken place, in some cases targets may be adjusted to reflect results of those assessments. In addition, with regard to gender equity, targets will be adjusted after an initial survey is undertaken and ratios of eligible female and male participants in each trainee group are established. Numbers of trainees will be disaggregated by sex, geographic area, job title, subject taught, and other relevant categories, depending on the indicator. This disaggregated information will not be reported through Geo-MIS, but rather used as a part of SSP reporting and public event presentations. Because many activities related to professional development are modeled in important ways on the LTD and MSN programs, SSP will use some of the same indicators. ...
