Model calibration and validation Sample Clauses

Model calibration and validation. 6.13.2.1 The models shall at least cover the areas as delineated on Figure 1 to incorporate all major influences on hydrodynamic and water quality. No field data collection is required for the purposes of model calibration for this study. However, the models shall have been properly calibrated and validated before their use in the study to simulate the hydrodynamic and water quality in the minimum model area described above with the field data collected by: • Hydraulic and Water Quality Studies in Victoria Harbour (1987); • Port and Airport Development Strategy - Enhancement of WAHMO Mathematical Models (1990); • Strategic Sewage Disposal Scheme Stage II - Oceanic Outfall, Oceanographic Surveys and Modelling (1992); • Update on Cumulative Water Quality and Hydrological Effect of Coastal Developments and Upgrading of Assessment Tool (1998); • EPD's routine monitoring data; • Tidal data from Hong Kong Observatory, Macau and relevant Mainland Authorities.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Model calibration and validation. The models are being calibrated using available information collected by Clermont, COE, OEPA, United States Geological Survey (USGS), and others. The model development process is being reviewed by Clermont’s SAC, a loosely formed consortium of representatives from OEPA, Miami University, University of Cincinnati, P&G, consultants working for the County, and a local environmental advocacy group, Little Miami, Inc. Through open discussion and evaluation of diverse perspectives and encouragement of the peer review process, SAC strives to assure that “good science” is used in developing the best available alternatives for addressing Clermont’s environmental needs. Model output and briefings are periodically presented to Stakeholder groups. Further discussion of the model testing and calibration will also be available during the implementation phases of the Project. Model output will be evaluated based on comparison with flow gaging and water quality monitoring at available monitoring stations. Model validation will determine if predictions are reasonable and make explicit the range of conditions over which the model can be used to determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Sample 1
Model calibration and validation. The model will be validated against the vehicle-mile- travelled (VMT) in 2019 GDOT Mileage by Route and Road System Report 445, 2019 traffic count from GDOT TADA, and internal external trip percentage by trip purposes based on NHTS and/or Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) data. The daily level of service (LOS) output will be compared with the 2020 Georgia Statewide Travel Demand Model (GSTDM) output to ensure consistency or similarity of LOS on state routes. The base year TDM validation will comply with the USDOT and GDOT’s recommended standards or reasonable ranges. Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual (Federal Highway Administration), NCHRP Report 716 Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques (Transportation Research Board), and
Sample 1

Related to Model calibration and validation

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

  • Maintenance and Testing 54.5.1. Sprint is only responsible for maintaining the facilities that it owns.

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • LIMITATIONS ON REVERSE ENGINEERING, DECOMPILATION AND DISASSEMBLY You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • Inspections and Testing Each Interconnected Entity shall perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Customer Facility with the Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Each Interconnected Entity shall have the right, upon advance written notice, to request reasonable additional testing of an Interconnected Entity’s facilities for good cause, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Calibration The comparison of a measurement system or device of unverified accuracy with a measurement system of known and greater accuracy to detect deviation of the unverified measurement system from required performance specifications (of the unverified measurement system or device) and to quantify all measured values to applicable units of the international system of units.

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Inspection and Final Acceptance District may, at its discretion, inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when within sixty (60) days after submitted to District. If District does not reject work by a timely written explanation, Consultant’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. District’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant’s work by District shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to indemnification and insurance provisions.

  • Installation and Use You may install and use the Software only for the number of licenses acquired by you. In order to exercise your rights to the Software under this Agreement, you must activate your copy of the Software in the manner described during the launch sequence.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.