Method 2. Qualification for a specific vehicle installation If a specific vehicle installation configuration is specified and the type approval of the system is limited to that specific vehicle installation configuration, then the test setup may also include other vehicle components in addition to the hydrogen storage system. These vehicle components (such as shielding or barriers, which are permanently attached to the vehicle's structure by means of welding or bolts and not affixed to the storage system) shall be included in the test setup in the vehicle-installed configuration relative to the hydrogen storage system. This localized fire test is conducted on the worst case localized fire exposure areas based on the four fire orientations: fires originating from the direction of the passenger compartment, luggage compartment, wheel xxxxx or ground-pooled gasoline.
Method 2. In the case of a financial offer and preferences:
Method 2. The sum of (A) and (B) as follows: (A) the amount determined by multiplying the income or loss allocable to the Participant’s Voluntary Employee Contributions, Mandatory Employee Contributions, Matching Contributions (if not used in the ADP Test), QNECs (if not used in the ADP Test) and, to the extent applicable, Elective Deferrals for the Plan Year, by a fraction, the numerator of which is such Participant’s Excess Aggregate Contributions for the Plan Year and the denominator of which is the Participant’s Account balance(s) attributable to Contribution Percentage Amounts as of the beginning of the Plan Year, plus any additional amounts attributable to Contribution Percentage Amounts allocated to the Participant during such Plan Year; plus (B) the amount of gap period income or loss equal to 10% of the amount determined under clause (A) above multiplied by the number of whole months between the end of the Plan Year and the distribution date, counting the month of distribution if the distribution occurs after the 15th day of such month.
Method 2. The sum of (A) and (B): (A) the amount determined by multiplying the income or loss allocable to the Participant’s Elective Deferrals (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) for the Plan Year, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Participant’s Excess Contributions for the Plan Year and the denominator of which is the Participant’s Elective Deferral Account balance (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) as of the beginning of the Plan Year plus any Elective Deferrals (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) allocated to the Participant during such Plan Year; plus (B) the amount of gap period income or loss equal to 10% of the amount determined under clause (A) above multiplied by the number of whole months between the end of the Plan Year and the distribution date, counting the month of distribution if the distribution occurs after the 15th day of such month. DC Basic Plan #01 Page 103 of 126 July 2008
Method 2. Amount of compensation = (Committed net profit of 2021*95%) - Actual net profit in 2021 The Buyer has the right to require the Core Selling Shareholders to compensate in cash. To avoid doubt, if the Company's actual net profit in 2021 reaches 95% of the committed net profit of 2021, the Core Selling Shareholders need not compensate the Buyer.
Method 2. Key informant interviews Though parents and their children contributed to the assessment of the intervention by giving their perspective, key informant interviews helped to understand overall trends in adolescent sexual health. The key informants, who were professionals experienced in implementing interventions, also gave valuable feedback on how to adapt and implement FTT. The purpose of the interviews was to understand the informants’ perceptions of the most pressing issues in adolescent sexual health in Paraguay, as well as their opinions on sexual education and the feasibility of a parent-based sexual education program such as FTT.
Method 2. 4.4.4 If Performance Allowances are to apply under Method 2 then all the Free Shares awarded in the relevant Performance Period can be awarded by reference to performance (this doesn’t mean that the Board necessarily has to determine that all the Free Shares will be awarded by reference to performance). The Board must determine the performance units into which employees will be divided and apply a performance measure to each such unit. Different performance measures may apply to different performance units provided that individuals within each performance unit participate in accordance with the Similar Terms Requirement. Awards of Shares to members of different performance units do not have to be in accordance with the Similar Terms Requirements, however, the likelihood (at the time they are set) of the performance measures being met by each performance unit must (in the reasonable opinion of the Board) be comparable.
Method 2. Select Acquire coordinates and then select the Host Model. Revit will automatically update the coordinates based on the Host Model. NOTE: If multiple models are linked into your project May 29, 2014 you must ensure that you select the correct Host Model. Selecting another linked model will not result in accurate results.
Method 2. Chanqe GLOBALEYES may elect to have a major change treated by GTE as a change application. A change application may affect GTE’s obligation to process and fulfill the original application, On receipt of a change application and non-refundable engineering fee, GTE will notify GLOBALEYES in writing within fifteen (15) days following receipt of the completed change application if requirements cannot be accommodated as specified. If on notification that GTE can accommodate the requirements of the change application, GLOBALEYES elects to proceed with the change application, GTE’s obligations under the original application will be merged with its obligations under the change application and the combined project will be the date the change application was submitted. All of the provisions herein applicable to an original application similarly apply to a change application.
Method 2. Downweighting observations with a score driven model Xxxxx et al. (2013) and Xxxxxx (2013) derive predictive filters based on the score of the conditional (or predictive) likelihood, which can arise from a wide range of distributions. These score driven models provide an alternative approach for cleaning where outlying observations are downweighted instead of being discarded completely. The downweighting scheme depends on the magnitude of the prediction errors and their estimated distribution. Using this approach it is possible to model openly the non-Gaussian features in the distribution of the measurement errors. In a cleaning context this method is used to derive pseudo observations where measurement errors are downweighted depending on their magnitude. A general location model The model is based on the general location Dynamic Conditional Score (DCS) model of Xxxxxx (2013) and Xxxxxx and Xxxxx (2014). The model is univariate; each release is modelled separately. The general location model is yi,t = Ztat + vt, at+1 = Tat + κut,
