Measures of Effectiveness Clause Examples

Measures of Effectiveness. Financial status report, no more than 90 days after the end of the budget period.
Measures of Effectiveness. The project would not change the number of vehicles served in the study area throughout the course of each study period; this is to be expected as the total demand volumes between the No Project and Plus Project scenarios are nearly identical. Peak period vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is largely identical between the No Project and Plus Project scenarios (less than a 1 percent increase between No Project and Plus Project). The modeled increase in VMT is attributed to more vehicles remaining on the mainline rather than diverting to other routes under Plus Project conditions. With the project, vehicle hours of delay in the study area would decrease by between 20 and 45 percent during the study periods (5:00 AM to 1:00 PM and 2:00 PM to 9:00 PM). Along southbound I-680, AM peak period travel times and travel speeds would improve with the project compared to the No Project condition, as the HOV/express lane would better accommodate demand volumes in the bottleneck between the Sunol Boulevard on-ramp and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Road off- ramp. Travel time along the corridor would also be more reliable than with the No Project condition due to the projected reductions in congestion. Similar benefits will occur in the PM peak period. Along northbound I-680, travel times, speeds, and delays would remain nearly constant for the AM peak period, as the facility would be uncongested in the No Project and Plus Project scenarios throughout the AM peak period. In the PM peak period, travel time with the project would decrease by nearly 5 percent, and travel speed would increase by about 6 percent. Travel time reliability would improve, as the maximum individual delay with the project would decrease from 4.1 minutes to 0.5 minutes. As discussed further in Section 5.2, the project is anticipated to be constructed in two phases. In Year 2025, if only Phase 1 is operational, it would decrease vehicle hours of delay in the study area by between 23 and 32 percent compared with the No Project condition. On southbound I-680, Phase 1 would result in lower average travel times, higher average travel speeds, and lower maximum individual delays than the No Project condition. The travel times, speeds, and individual delays for southbound I-680 with Phase 1 would be the same as with the Plus Project condition (both phases constructed). Travel times, travel speeds, and maximum individual delays on northbound I-680 would be the same as with the No Project condition. HOV/express lanes, like high-occupanc...
Measures of Effectiveness. For the AM peak period, speeds along southbound I-680 average near 52 miles per hour (mph), but the maximum individual delay of 17.0 minutes (versus an average travel time of 19.7 minutes) indicates severe congestion due to the Sunol Boulevard bottleneck. During the PM peak period, southbound I-680 speeds are generally near free flow (64.6 mph), as the travel time calculation limits do not include the queue for the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Canyon Road to Alcosta Boulevard bottleneck. However, the effects of queuing for the Stoneridge Drive to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue bottleneck are evident in the maximum individual delay of
Measures of Effectiveness. To provide a comprehensive evaluation of TSP strategy impacts, we used several ▇▇▇▇ to regularly assess impacts on traffic and transit operations. Each MOE reflected the impact of the TSP system from a certain perspective, and they jointly provided a relatively complete assessment on the SS-RTSP project. In this study, we separated the chosen ▇▇▇▇ into two categories: primary ▇▇▇▇ and secondary ones. The primary ▇▇▇▇ addressed our major concerns about the SS-RTSP project and could be calculated by using field-observed data. The secondary ▇▇▇▇ were useful for an in-depth understanding of TSP performance but could not be directly derived from field-observed data. We relied on microscopic simulation models to calculate the secondary ▇▇▇▇.
Measures of Effectiveness. At PESG, we measure our effectiveness by two predominant factors: fill rates and customer satisfaction.
Measures of Effectiveness. The District shall provide C/CAG with performance measure criteria to assess the effectiveness of the Redi-Wheels program including but not limited to: a) hours of service per month, b) number of trips per month, and number of individuals who ride in a given month, c) cost per passenger. The Redi-Wheels program includes sub-contracted taxi services. In addition, the District will also provide C/CAG with metrics illustrating Redi-Wheels contractors' performance relative to established goals, which include:

Related to Measures of Effectiveness

  • Conditions of Effectiveness This Amendment shall become effective when, and only when, all of the following have occurred: (a) the Company, the Subsidiary Borrower and the Required Lenders shall have executed a counterpart hereof and delivered the same to the Administrative Agent or, in the case of any Lender as to which an executed counterpart hereof shall not have been so delivered, the Administrative Agent shall have received written confirmation by telecopy or other similar writing from such Lender of execution of a counterpart hereof by such Lender; (b) the Company has terminated all commitments and paid in full all amounts outstanding under that certain $250,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006 among the Company, the lenders party thereto and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent; (c) if requested by any Lender, a new Committed Note and a Competitive Note executed by the Company and payable to the order of such Lender; (d) a certificate of an officer and of the secretary or an assistant secretary of the Delegate, certifying, inter alia (A) true and complete copies of each of the limited liability company agreement of the Delegate, the certificate of incorporation, as amended and in effect, of the General Partner, the partnership agreements, each as amended and in effect, of the Borrowers, the bylaws, as amended and in effect, of the General Partner and the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Delegate (1) authorizing the execution, delivery and performance by each Borrower of this Amendment and, in the case of the Company, the Borrowings to be made and the Letters of Credit to be issued under the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby, (2) approving the forms of this Amendment and (3) authorizing officers of the Delegate to execute and deliver this Amendment, (B) the incumbency and specimen signatures of the officers of the Delegate executing this Amendment and (C) (1) that the representations and warranties made by such Borrower in each Loan Document to which such Borrower is a party and which will be delivered at or prior to the initial Borrowing Date are true and correct in all material respects, (2) the absence of any proceedings for the dissolution or liquidation of such Borrower and (3) the absence of the occurrence and continuance of any Default or Event of Default; (e) a favorable, signed opinion addressed to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders from Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, counsel to the Borrowers, given upon the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇nst▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ of the Borrowers; and (f) certificates of appropriate public officials as to the existence, good standing and qualification to do business as a foreign entity of each Borrower, the General Partner and the Delegate in the States of Texas and Delaware.

  • Counterparts; Integration; Effectiveness This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (and by different parties hereto in different counterparts), each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract. This Agreement and the other Loan Documents constitute the entire contract among the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersede any and all previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. Except as provided in Section 4.01, this Agreement shall become effective when it shall have been executed by the Administrative Agent and when the Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts hereof that, when taken together, bear the signatures of each of the other parties hereto. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Agreement by telecopy or other electronic imaging means shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement.

  • Term and Effectiveness This Agreement shall become effective as of the first date written above. Once effective, this Agreement shall remain in effect for two years, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive one-year periods; provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by: (i) the vote of the Board of Directors, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors, in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act.

  • Counterparts and Effectiveness This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, which shall be treated as originals for all purposes, and all so executed shall constitute one agreement, binding on all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart. Any such counterpart shall be admissible into evidence as an original hereof against each Person who executed it. The execution of this Agreement and delivery thereof by facsimile shall be sufficient for all purposes, and shall be binding upon any party who so executes.

  • Counterparts; Effectiveness This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. This Agreement shall become effective when each party hereto shall have received counterparts hereof signed by all of the other parties hereto.