Measures and Indicators Sample Clauses

Measures and Indicators. E-ARK has established a number of overall goals for the outcomes of its activities. These are contained in Appendix 1 to this document. We have agreed with the European Commission a number of Indicators to not only measure performance but also to demonstrate continuous improvement throughout the life of the project. These are shown in full in Appendix 2 to this document. Our commitment to continuous improvement will be reflected by learning lessons and responding to feedback from the people with whom we interact, not only outside the project, but also from within our own project team. The following indicators are measured in part or in full by our Dissemination Activities. We have included our achievements in Year 1: Indicator No. Relating to which goal? Indicator Method of measurement Minimum Expected Progress
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Measures and Indicators. E-ARK has established a number of overall goals for the outcomes of its activities. These are contained in Appendix 1 to this document. We have agreed with the European Commission a number of Indicators to not only measure performance but also to demonstrate continuous improvement throughout the life of the project. These are shown in full in Appendix 2 to this document. Our commitment to continuous improvement will be reflected by learning lessons and responding to feedback from the people with whom we interact, not only outside the project, but also from within our own project team. The following indicators are measured in part or in full by our Dissemination Activities. We have included our achievements in Years 1 and 2: Indicator No. Relating to which goal? Indicator Method of measurement Minimum Expected Progress Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 8 Goal 1 and 2 Feedback Score (Range: 1 to 5) Subjective / Numeric: Delegates at each event to provide detailed feedback Measured by: Use of web-based SurveyMonkey survey forms and paper forms 70% of responses Score >=4 Achieved at DLM Forum meeting, Luxembourg, September 2015 ✓ 150 500 Numeric: Total number 9 Goal 2 Newsletter Now distributed of downloads of the newsletter per issue Measured by: 322 view s as at 510 views as at 31/1 1000 monthly via http:/xxxxx.xx Online web analytics plus feed to Project Google Analytics page 31/1 2015 2016 ✓ ✓ Self-Assessment / Numeric: 18 Goal 1 Overall Project Impact Survey (Range: 1 to 5) Using Project mailing list, responses to survey of all persons with whom the project comes into contact during its entire life to determine the extent to which E-ARK has positively impacted them and their organisations N/A N/A 70% of respo nses Scor e >=4 Measured by: Use of web-based SurveyMonkey survey forms We will also continuously measure levels of Stakeholder Engagement by monitoring of website hits and activity levels on a variety of social media channels on which we will maintain a presence. We have established the following quantitative measures for this activity: Number of hits on our website Number of unique website visitors Locations of website visitors (where identifiable) Number of accounts following E-ARK Twitter Account Number of third-party Tweets referring to E-ARK Number of accounts joining a LinkedIn E-ARK account. As a result of our successes in the first year we decided to ‘stretch’ our targets for the second year as follows: by the end of month 24 we would achieve MEASURE TAR...
Sample 1
Measures and Indicators. The parties agree to use data, information and knowledge to better inform decision- making and to assess and improve the following; How well are we performing as an organisation? What are we good at? What do we need to improve? Training and support in the use of improvement methods and tools is provided to ensure that employees can proactive Iy improve the way they carry out their roles. Agreed measures and indicators play a vital role in the mapping and understanding of organisation processes as they identify areas where there is potential for further improvement. The primary role of performance measures and indicators is to assist in the attainment of team, department and corporate goals in the interest of customer, staff and Council. Performance measures and indicators may include: Customer service, satisfaction and/or value (internal and external) Wastage and rework Service delivery cost Workforce participation in productivity improvements Skills, education and training Equipment down time Work, health, safety and welfare Equal Employment Opportunity DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LOXTON WAIKERIE. EB AGREEMENT OF 2015
Sample 1
Measures and Indicators. In order to evaluate the performance of the multi-core processor we will consider subjective and objective KPIs based on media quality like:  Packet loss  Video frame rate used  Video frame size used  Video frame loss  Security and authentication  Subjective perceived quality  Subjective user experience A Frequentis radio tester/simulator (connected to the WebRTC-to-radio-gateway) shall be used to verify the radio application requirements:  Bidirectional audio connection.  Presence of radio signalling information like Push-To-Talk, etc. Audio and Push-To-Talk delay are the most important performance indicators in radio communication and shall be measured for the WebRTC radio communication demonstrator. The verification of the Frequentis communication system platform software on the new WebRTC radio touch terminal will be implicitly tested.
Sample 1
Measures and Indicators. In order to evaluate the performance of the mixed-criticality networking infrastructure we will consider subjective and objective KPIs based on frame transmission quality such as:  Jitter of messages  Delay of messages  Packet loss  Correct priorization of traffic classes  Co-existence of different traffic classes over one integrated physical network These will be tested both in isolated modes (not mixed-criticality) and in various combinations between safety-critical, priority-based and best-effort traffic.
Sample 1
Measures and Indicators. The main measures and indicators to be used in the envisioned demonstrators are the following:  Energy measurements, to verify reduced energy consumption within the house  Time measurements, in order to verify that the system introduces minimum delays  Measurements regarding the level of user needs’ satisfaction, based on feedback provided to the autonomous pervasive system  The network will reliably deliver data from sensors within a reasonable time even in a network with dense traffic. A dynamic environment with sensors generating variable data traffic will be created for testing purposes.  Service management on the gateway will be demonstrated as well as concrete services for handling sensors and data generated by a wireless network.  Openness, to provide open API based on open standards to ensure future integration with third- party systems
Sample 1
Measures and Indicators. System power dissipation. This metric needs to be compared to state of the art system solutions for the same radio-links.  Efficiency of the compiler/processor in code density and instructions per clock cycle vs ARM m0 and ARM m3 together with ARM gcc compiler.  User friendliness of the development environment.  Processor clock speed, processor power required to execute a certain function compared with competition devices.  (Soft) Scalability of the overall environment towards other high data-rate standards.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Measures and Indicators. The validation of the demonstrator here proposed includes many different elements. The most relevant are listed here. They are:  Proper operation of the redundant network topology. This will be shown by a seamless operation of the different elements even on the case of opening the network ring.  High accurate synchronization for the RTUs and critical Smart Grid elements as PMUs. This will be evaluated based on the PPS output of the different network elements (switches and nodes). Using a simple oscilloscope we can measure the synchronization accuracy.  Zero-recovery time and low latency. Packet time-stamping will significantly help to achieve measures of network latencies and recovery time. Nodes will record this information to validate these premises.  Proper operation of the control system in real time.  Safety level for the RTUs
Sample 1

Related to Measures and Indicators

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Indicators Debt to Asset Ratio (10%) •Cash Flow (10%) •Total Margin (25%) Risk Assessment Results

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Milestones Subject to the provisions of the SGIP, the Parties shall agree on milestones for which each Party is responsible and list them in Attachment 4 of this Agreement. A Party’s obligations under this provision may be extended by agreement. If a Party anticipates that it will be unable to meet a milestone for any reason other than a Force Majeure event, it shall immediately notify the other Parties of the reason(s) for not meeting the milestone and (1) propose the earliest reasonable alternate date by which it can attain this and future milestones, and (2) requesting appropriate amendments to Attachment 4. The Party affected by the failure to meet a milestone shall not unreasonably withhold agreement to such an amendment unless it will suffer significant uncompensated economic or operational harm from the delay, (1) attainment of the same milestone has previously been delayed, or (2) it has reason to believe that the delay in meeting the milestone is intentional or unwarranted notwithstanding the circumstances explained by the Party proposing the amendment.

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • Targets and Milestones You may choose to develop specific additional targets and milestones which assess your performance in ITT over time – particularly if ITT trainees make up a significant proportion of your overall student body. Alternatively, you may have targets and milestones in your existing 2012-13 access agreement which you now also wish to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. These targets may be statistical – based on how representative your entrants are and/or your retention performance – and might include annual or interim milestones to help you monitor whether you are making progress. You may wish to include criteria around the numbers of trainees in receipt of a full or partial maintenance grant, as financial data will need to be collected to determine bursary support and the data will also be accessible through the Student Loans Company for HEBSS subscribers. You may also wish to consider the TDA guidance at Annex C which gives information on specific groups that are Annex A underrepresented in the teaching profession. In this section, please state whether you intend to develop additional targets and milestones, or the extent to which you intend to use targets and milestones in your existing agreement which you now wish to extend to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. Where you have new or amended milestones and targets, you should set these out in your Excel template (Annex B) at Table 6. The University of Cambridge does not intend to adjust its current targets or to develop additional targets and milestones for its ITT provision. The number of students on the PGCE programme amount to less than 4% of the total population of Cambridge students with which the Office for Fair Access is concerned, and all of those students have already experienced a first taste of higher education. It would therefore be disproportionate to set specific aims and objectives for this group.

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Safety Measures Awarded vendor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of employees on the worksite, and shall erect and properly maintain all necessary safeguards for protection of workers and the public. Awarded vendor shall post warning signs against all hazards created by the operation and work in progress. Proper precautions shall be taken pursuant to state law and standard practices to protect workers, general public and existing structures from injury or damage.

  • Targets a) Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.