Manipulation. The Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, take, directly or indirectly, any action designed, or which will constitute, or has constituted, or might reasonably be expected to cause or result in the stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of the Company to facilitate the sale or resale of the Securities.
Manipulation. Prior to the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates has taken any action which is designed to or which has constituted or which might have been expected to cause or result in stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of the Company in connection with the sale of the Shares.
Manipulation. The Company has not taken and will not, in violation of applicable law, take, any action designed to or that might reasonably be expected to cause or result in stabilization or manipulation of the price of the Shares to facilitate the sale or resale of the Shares.
Manipulation. None of such Selling Shareholder or its Affiliates (as defined below) or any person acting on its or any of their behalf has taken or will take, directly or indirectly, any action designed to cause or result in, or which constitutes or might reasonably be expected to constitute, the stabilization or manipulation of the price of the Shares or any reference security, whether to facilitate the sale or resale of the Shares or otherwise and has taken no action which could directly or indirectly violate Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Manipulation. The Company will not take any action prohibited by Regulation M under the Exchange Act in connection with the distribution of the Offered Securities contemplated hereby and the Company will not take any action designed to or that would constitute or that might reasonably be expected to cause or result in, stabilization or manipulation of the price of any securities of the Company to facilitate the sale or resale of the Offered Securities.
Manipulation. Neither you, bidders nor sellers may manipulate the price of any item nor may you interfere with other user's listings or transactions.
Manipulation. Except as set forth on Schedule 5.19, prior to the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates has taken any action which is designed to or which has constituted or which might have been expected to cause or result in stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of the Company in connection with the sale of the Shares.
Manipulation. Neither Infinity Capital nor, to the best of knowledge of Infinity Capital, any Affiliate of Infinity Capital (including, without limitation, Xxxxxxx), has taken and will, in violation of applicable Requirement of Law, take, any action designed to or that might reasonably be expected to cause or result in unlawful manipulation of the price of the ADSs or the Equity Shares.
Manipulation. Neither the Company, nor any of its affiliates, has ------------ taken or may take, directly or indirectly, any action designed to cause or result in, or which has constituted or which might reasonably be expected to constitute, the manipulation of the price of the shares of Common Stock.
Manipulation. In order to find the most fitting scenario to manipulate autonomy, a pretest was conducted. The pretest was completed by 93 respondents. After excluding 24 respondents for not filling in the questionnaire completely and 8 respondents for incorrectly answering the control question, a sample of 61 respondents was left. The sample consisted of 17 men and 44 women aged between 17 and 69 years old (M = 35.34, SD = 16.34). The pretest was conducted in Dutch as well. The participants were invited to complete the questionnaire via social media. They had six days to do so, namely from 22nd January 2019 until 27th January 2019. The first set of questions in the pretest (see appendix 7.1.) started with a scenario based on Lunardo and Saintives (2017). The respondents were asked to imagine themselves attending a cooking class. In the high autonomy condition (N = 20), respondents were completely unrestrained. They could look up a recipe themselves and make as much changes as they wished. In the neutral condition (N = 19), respondents could choose between three different recipes and were permitted to make minor changes. In the low autonomy condition (N = 22), respondents were obligated to follow a certain recipe and were not allowed to make any changes. Since a between-subjects design was used, participants were randomly assigned to only one of the versions of the scenario. Next, perceived autonomy was assessed using a two-item measure taken from a paper by Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx and Xxxxxx (2013). The following items were rated (α = .95): 1. The extent to which they could do what pleases them (1 = In this situation I have the feeling that I can never do what I want, 7 = In this situation I have the feeling that I always can do what I want) and 2. The extent to which they are in control of the decisions (1 = In this situation I have the feeling I have absolutely no control over the decisions, 7 = In this situation I have the feeling I have complete control over the decisions). Thereafter, they answered a general question about how they felt in the situation on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = In this situation I feel really bad, 7 = In this situation I feel really good). Subsequently, as a means of a manipulation check, respondents filled out a question existing of four items (α = .93) based on a paper of Xxxx and Xxxxxxxx (2014) (e.g. I believe I had a choice about which meal to prepare, 1 = Strongly disagree, 7 = Strongly agree). Finally, the respondents were asked to specify ...
