MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. The relative importance of the technical sub factors is: Technical Understanding is more important than Personnel Qualification; Personnel Qualifications is more important than Management Capability. Technical Capability factor, including all subfactors, is more important than Factor 2: Past Performance. Factor 3: Small Business Participation is of least importance. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. However, as non-price factors become closer in perceived value, price considerations will become more important. Trade-off considerations may result in the determination that it is in the best interest of the Government to award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror. M-2-1 FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. The provider should demonstrate willingness to collaborate closely with CYPS and address any staffing issues so as to reduce impact on the delivery of services. The provider should make adequate provision for the training and development of staff, particularly the staff involved in the proposed service contract. The provided must demonstrate the ability to conduct a systematic training needs analysis, or adhere to IIP principles.
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. 18.1 If at any time prior to the expiry of this Agreement a Named Executive Departure occurs, the Manager shall as soon as reasonably practicable notify Invest NI of the Named Executive Departure.
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. This sub-factor evaluates the offeror’s Management Capability. The offeror will provide the following information to describe its Management Capability to perform the requirements in the PWS: Element 1 Management Structure and Plan, Element 2 Contract Administration Element 3 Human Resources Management Element 4 Transition Phase-In- Property Control
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. In relative order of importance, Technical Suitability is slightly more important than Preventative Maintenance Capability and both are substantially more important than Management Capability.
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. Management Capability has four elements to include the following: 1) Management Structure and Plan, 2) Contract Administration,
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY o Have you received or are you working toward an environmental/social or quality management system (e.g. to ISO 14001 or ISO 9000)? o Please describe the management system. o If you answered no to the question above, have you got an environmental policy and/or a set of environmental/social or quality management objectives or programs in place? o Are there staff in the company with identified roles relating to environment, health and safety or social issues? o Please list the staff names along with their job title. o Describe the level of environmental, social and health and safety training provided to staff. Environmental and Social Monitoring Data The following tables should be completed to provide IFC with the necessary monitoring data for this reporting period. If you already have all the data requested on the tables available in another format, then this can be used instead. Please provide the name and location of all monitoring points and provide data in the units requested in the WBG guidelines as summarized below. Please refer to Annex A of ‘Guidance to Project GEOPARK on the submission of the AMR’ if you would like additional guidance on the most appropriate ways to measure and report monitoring data. Ambient Air Quality GEOPARK is required to collect representative samples of ambient air at an agreed number of locations outside the property boundary fence, submit collected samples for analysis and report the results to IFC. Sample Frequency (e.g. quarterly) Ambient Air Quality Parameter World Bank Group/IFC Maximum Levels Performance In WBG/IFC Units Annual Average Argentina- Chile Regulatory Limits and units Performance in Argentina- Chile units Annual average Monitoring Location (please specify) Particulate Matter (PM10) Annual arithmetic mean 50 µg/m3 µg/m3 Maximum 24 hour average 150 µg/m3 µg/m3 Nitrogen Dioxide µg/m3 µg/m3 Annual arithmetic mean 100 mg/m3 Maximum 24 hour average 150 mg/m3 Sulfur Dioxide Annual arithmetic mean 80 mg/m3 Maximum 24 hour average 150 mg/m3 Green House Gas Emissions GEOPARK is required to report GHG emissions in ton/year of CO2 equivalent. GEOPARK should include the evaluations made during this reporting period for the reduction of GHG.
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. 5.1 Xxxxxx Xxxxx left the organisation in September to take up the post of CEO at Sheffield Theatre. Xxx Xxxxxx, our new CEO, who is currently Executive Director of Oldham Coliseum joins us in December.
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. 1. Provide a narrative description of your management strategy to manage this effort successfully including organizational structure, staffing plan, transition plan and critical management systems. (See Subfactor 3 definition in Section M-2-1) Technical proposals that are unrealistic in terms of technical commitment will be deemed reflective of an inherent lack of technical competence or indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk involved in the contract requirements and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal. To ensure that Volume I is evaluated strictly on its merit, no cost information is to be included in this proposal. L-4 VOLUME II – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY. The relative importance of the technical sub factors is: Technical Understanding is more important than Personnel Qualification; Personnel Qualifications is more important than Management Capability. Factor 1: Technical Capability, including all subfactors, is more important than Factor 2: Past Performance. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. However, as non-price factors become closer in perceived value, price considerations will become more important. Trade-off considerations may result in the determination that it is in the best interest of the Government to award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.
