Main Challenges Sample Clauses

Main Challenges. For achieving the mentioned high performance gains we had to develop advanced clustering schemes that ensure user-centric cooperation for almost all users. At the same time, the inter- cluster interference had to be minimized. Reducing the overall interference floor in the system with respect to intra- as well as inter-cluster interference was another high level goal. The use of appropriate types of user grouping and scheduling proved to be very important and powerful tools. Another task was to find precoders with high performance, low complexity and at the same time robustness against imperfections. Finally, as discussed above, interference mitigation by its nature provides gains only in interference limited scenarios. We assume that the system is working under such conditions.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Main Challenges. Higher customer Expectation; • Loss of positioning on world map; • Increasing competition from foreign products coupled with a lack of marketing and distribution skills; • Limited access to technology and business information; • Limited access and/or lack of customized technical assistance programs; • Strong competition in the local and the international markets; and • Labor costs are increasing whereas international export prices are decreasing THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION For more information: kindly visit our web site xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Tel +000 0 0000000
Sample 1
Main Challenges. Despite the power of innovation procurement, a number of barriers are preventing greater use of the approach. These are some of the obstacles2: - Lack of understanding of what innovation procurement is and how it works. - Lack of sufficient procurement expertise for complex purchases. - Risk aversion. - Low interaction and communication between public buyers and potential suppliers. - Lack of public demand. - Too rigid tender specifications that do not give enough space to innovation. - Difficulties in the access to public tenders by potential suppliers. 2 XXXXXX, X.; XXXXX, X.; XXXXXX-XXXXXXX, J.; XXXXXXXXX, X.; XXXX, X. Xxxxxxxx to innovation through public procurement: a supplier perspective. Technovation. Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2014, Pages 631-645 xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/publication/261918143_Barriers_to_innovation_through_public_procurement_A_supplier _perspective 2. COMMUNICATION OBJECTIVES The specific communication objectives of Procure2Innovate are the following: • Raise awareness and interest on innovation procurement • Promote the Procure2Innovate project, including the work and services of the competence centres for innovation procurement to various target groups at the European level • Conduct European-level promotion of the network of competence centres • Attract newcomer countries (without established competence centres) to join the Procure2Innovate Network • Support the communication work of the individual competence centres, namely country-level communications • Support communication with respect to cross-border joint procurement ambitions In simple terms, the consortium’s goals for the duration of the communication and dissemination mandate within Procure2Innovate will be to:
Sample 1
Main Challenges. Similar to equity instruments, there is no recovery provided in the case of bankruptcy. Investors could prioritise owning preferred stocks, which would enable them to receive control rights, board seat, veto rights, and/or other economic rights. Investors are not remunerated 12 for the early-stage risk they are taking. In fact, they get paid only when the company raise additional funding. Unlike debt instrument, a SAFE does not accrue interest and it lacks a maturity date, which entails that there is no guarantee of equity ownership for the investor. (Hypothetical) Example of SAFE Company ImpactFly is a startup that aims to revolutionize the use of drones to measure access to electrification and clean drinking water in rural areas. The company is evenly owned by two founders (2 million shares each, 4 million in total) who decide to raise capital via a USD 500,000 SAFE offered by an investor. Once the agreement is signed, the two founders can use the money received to process the building of their venture. After 16 months the company is booming and the sales pipeline is skyrocketing, but the company is still not profitable and ImpactFly needs to raise additional funds (e.g. Series A round) in order to scale their business. The two founders approach a venture capital fund to raise an additional USD 1 million for 25% of the ownership, translating into a pre-money valuation of USD 4 million. Summary of information Pre-money valuation of USD 4 million Number of outstanding shares of 4 million SAFE Investment of USD 500,000 Share price pre-money of USD 1 Let’s look at the transaction under three different scenarios: The SAFE is offered with a 15% discount The SAFE investor is entitled to a discount of 15%, therefore he or she will be able to convert at 85% of the price, providing the investor with 11% of the post-money (USD 5 million) ownership. The SAFE is offered with a valuation cap of USD 3 million The SAFE investor is entitled to convert at 75% of the price as a result of a valuation cap of USD 3 million, providing the investor with 12% of the post- money (USD 5 million) ownership. The SAFE is offered with a 15% discount and a valuation cap of USD 3 million The investor is entitled to convert at the minimum price between the discount price and the valuation cap price. In this case, the investor would apply the cap allowing him or her to obtain a 12% ownership instead of 11%. Case studies and additional resources about SAFE can be found here.
Sample 1
Main Challenges 
Sample 1

Related to Main Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Legal Action If you are dissatisfied with the determination of your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law. Under state law, you may not begin court proceedings prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the date you filed your claim. In no event may legal action be taken against us later than three (3) years from the date you were required to file the claim. For members covered by a group (employer sponsored) health plan, your plan may be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended. Under federal law, if your plan is subject to ERISA you may have the right to bring legal action under section 502(a) of ERISA after you have exhausted all appeals available under the plan. That means, for both medical and administrative appeals, federal law requires that you pursue a final decision from the plan, prior to filing suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. For a medical appeal, that final decision is the determination of the appeal. You are not required to submit your claim to external review prior to filing a suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. Consult your employer to determine whether this applies to you and what your rights and obligations may be. If you are dissatisfied with the decision on your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law.

  • Legal Proceedings Except as described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there are no legal, governmental or regulatory investigations, actions, suits or proceedings pending to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is or may be a party or to which any property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries is or may be the subject that, individually or in the aggregate, if determined adversely to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; no such investigations, actions, suits or proceedings are threatened or, to the knowledge of the Company, contemplated by any governmental or regulatory authority or threatened by others; and (i) there are no current or pending legal, governmental or regulatory actions, suits or proceedings that are required under the Securities Act to be described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus that are not so described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus and (ii) there are no statutes, regulations or contracts or other documents that are required under the Securities Act to be filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement or described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus that are not so filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement or described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus.

  • Legal Actions A Receiver may bring, prosecute, enforce, defend and abandon any action, suit or proceedings in relation to any Security Asset which he thinks fit.

  • Notification of Government Investigation or Legal Proceedings Within 30 days after discovery, Xxxxx shall notify OIG, in writing, of any ongoing investigation or legal proceeding known to Xxxxx conducted or brought by a governmental entity or its agents involving an allegation that Xxxxx has committed a crime or has engaged in fraudulent activities. This notification shall include a description of the allegation, the identity of the investigating or prosecuting agency, and the status of such investigation or legal proceeding. Xxxxx shall also provide written notice to OIG within 30 days after the resolution of the matter, and shall provide OIG with a description of the findings and/or results of the proceedings, if any.

  • No Infringement To the best of the Company's knowledge, the Company has not violated or infringed and is not currently violating or infringing, and the Company has not received any communications alleging that the Company (or any of its employees or consultants) has violated or infringed, any Intellectual Property of any other person or entity, to the extent that any such violation or infringement, either individually or together with all other such violations and infringements, would have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Notification of Government Investigation or Legal Proceeding Within 30 days after discovery, Progenity shall notify OIG, in writing, of any ongoing investigation or legal proceeding known to Progenity conducted or brought by a governmental entity or its agents involving an allegation that Progenity has committed a crime or has engaged in fraudulent activities. This notification shall include a description of the allegation, the identity of the investigating or prosecuting agency, and the status of such investigation or legal proceeding. Progenity shall also provide written notice to OIG within 30 days after the resolution of the matter, and shall provide OIG with a description of the findings and/or results of the investigation or proceeding, if any.

  • Access to the Courts of Justice Each Contracting Party shall in its Area accord to investors of the other Contracting Party treatment no less favourable than the treatment which it accords in like circumstances to its own investors or investors of a non- Contracting Party with respect to access to the courts of justice and administrative tribunals and agencies in all degrees of jurisdiction, both in pursuit and in defence of such investors’ rights.

  • Complaints and Feedback 15.3.1 The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services will rest with the Provider. The Provider will have procedures in place including but not limited to a complaints framework, which are acceptable to the Department, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community. The Provider must also keep a log of the complaints received which will be accessible to the Department upon request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.