Long-Form Evaluations Sample Clauses

Long-Form Evaluations. Long-form evaluations shall be limited to the established criteria and procedures herein set forth and intended to comply with state law. Each employee shall be observed in the performance of his or her assigned duties for the purpose of evaluation at least twice during the school year and shall total not less than sixty (60) minutes. The two (2) required observations shall be conducted by a certificated administrator. Scheduled observations shall include a pre-conference at the request of the evaluator or the employee to establish and/or discuss evaluation criteria, indicators, long-term goals, or other information which may be relevant to the evaluation process but may not be readily observed in an observation session. At the request of the evaluator or the employee, these meetings can take place during a planning period. The evaluation form is to be completed and copies provided to the employee, the evaluator, and one (1) copy to the employee’s personnel file. Principals and others authorized to make evaluations or observations may make observations other than those specifically required at any time during the school year and hold conferences for the purpose of discussing job related performance not specifically noted in observations. All observations shall be identified in the evaluation report as to date, time, and length of observation and shall state in specific terms what was observed and how this relates to the negotiated criteria. Within three (3) days after the completion of an evaluation report, the employee shall be provided with a copy of the evaluation report and afforded an opportunity to confer with the evaluator at a mutually agreed upon time. The employee shall be entitled to append comments or explanations within a reasonable amount of time. In the event that any evaluation report indicates that the employee has performance deficiencies in one (1) or more areas defined in the evaluation criteria, the evaluator and the employee shall attempt to develop a mutually agreeable written plan designed to improve the employee's effectiveness in the deficient areas. If the evaluator and the employee are unable to agree on a mutually acceptable plan, the evaluator shall prepare and deliver such a plan to the employee. In connection with the development of such a plan, the employee shall be provided with a statement that will include:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Long-Form Evaluations

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.