Local Planning Sample Clauses

Local Planning. LIDDA shall conduct local planning in the LSA as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (33)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Local Planning. The project is located in the City of San Diego as well as unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego. The City limit crosses the project alignment approximately 2,000 feet east of Sanyo Avenue. The portion of the project area east of the City limit is located within the EOMSP area of unincorporated San Diego County. The EOMSP area encompasses approximately 3,013 acres of mostly undeveloped land just north of the international border. The area is bounded on the west by the City of San Diego, and on the north and east by two natural landforms, the Otay River Valley and the San Ysidro Mountains, respectively. Development of East Otay Mesa is guided by a Specific Plan (SP 93-004) that was adopted by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors on July 24, 1994. A Specific Plan Amendment (SPA 10-001) was adopted in 2010 (see Figure 4). This plan allocates 2,110 acres for high-intensity commercial and industrial use, 552 acres for low- intensity use (residential, conservation/limited use), and 351 acres for circulation corridors. Source: East Otay Mesa Specific Plan Amendment, September 2010
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Local Planning. The City of Marysville Capital Investment Plan (CIP), dated 2017, mentions and identifies the need for several capital projects that coordinate the financing and timely improvements in a way that maximizes the return to the public. Relevant projects include • Bicycle Lane Street Striping (Project No. 2016-4.01). This project will place bike lane striping and legends on city streets to conform to the new standards and specifications of the Master Plan. • Sidewalk Repairs & ADA Ramps - Various Locations (Project No. 2014- 4.05). This project will focus on making sidewalk repairs to eliminate impediments to accessibility and constructing curb ramps between sidewalks. • Union Pacific Railroad Track - Reroute and Decommission (Project No. 2016- 4.03). This project would reroute the Union Pacific railroad track that bisects the city (and includes the Marysville Underpass and the south structure of the Binney Junction Underpass) to the westerly city limits. Per the CIP, the project will likely cost at least $50 million and take 8-10 years to complete. In addition, the City of Marysville General Plan, dated August 1985, which serves as a long-term guide for orderly growth and development within the City limits, provides the following aspects which are included in the proposed project: • To promote pedestrian access (II.C.4) • Landscaping and tree planting required adjacent to highways (II.C.5) • To provide a bikeway system as a beneficial transportation mode alternative (II.C.8) • To protect residents from health hazards and annoyance associated with excessive noise levels (II.E) • B Street Underpass (Marysville Underpass) lighting improvements and bridge structure protection measures (IV.C.2.c)
Sample 1Sample 2
Local Planning. In the City of Xxxxx General Plan (2011) and the City of Xxxxx Transportation Master Plan (TMP) (2012), Xxxxxxxxx Pass Road is identified as four-lane County Road and four-lane expressway in the project area. Both documents identify Mountain House Parkway needing to be improved to meet Expressway Standards as shown on TMP Chapter 4 and also for build out of their communities.
Sample 1Sample 2
Local Planning. Planning studies including the City of Xxxxxxxxx Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2014) and the Xxxxxxxxx Mobility Revitalization Plan (2020) all demonstrate the need for connectivity and access to bike and pedestrian infrastructure to be incorporated into this bridge project. In addition, the community of Xxxxxxxxx has expressed the need for connectivity and safe access to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Approximately 500 new homes are being constructed in a new development at the south end of town, resulting in significant population growth for this disadvantaged community. CONNECTIVITY: Note that bicycle and pedestrian access to and across the bridge will link to and create important connectivity to the community of Guadalupe and the future Santa Xxxxx River levee trail which is currently in development by the County of Santa Xxxxxxx. Directly adjacent to this project and to south of the bridge, the Xxxxxxxxx XXX project (05-1E030) is in development with a RTL date of May 2024, that will construct pedestrian improvements, add buffered bicycle lanes and transit stop improvements as well as other improvements. The preferred alternative is compatible with local plans. The pedestrian walkway and the bicyclist path on the bridge reduces the reliance on automobile travel which reduces air pollution. Traffic Current and forecasted traffic volumes along with collision data has been collected for this project. This data is presented below.
Sample 1Sample 2
Local Planning. For reference purposes, SR-91 is classified as a State Freeway on the OCTA’s County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). OCTA’s Measure M (M1) one-half cent sales tax funded delivery of transportation improvements between 1990 and 2011. After experiencing the success and progress of M1, Orange County voters renewed the half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements in November 2006 for another 30 years to 2041 to launch the Renewed Measure M (M2). In 2012, the M2020 Plan was approved by the OCTA Board to provide guidance on program delivery priorities between 2013 and 2020. This plan was developed as a self-sustaining sales tax measure; however, due to slower than anticipated growth in the M2 sales tax revenue proceeds, the M2020 Plan objectives were reevaluated in 2016 to: assess implications of the revised long-term revenue forecast, determine what had been accomplished to date, and assess what can be assumed to move forward. The OCTA Board approved the Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan) on November 14, 2016 as the replacement for the M2020 Plan. The Next 10 Plan provides guidance regarding what can be accomplished over the 10 years between 2017 and 2026. The proposed project is listed as Project I in the Next 10 Plan. The proposed project is included in the OCTA’s 2014 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) titled, “Outlook 2035: Because Mobility Matters” (September 12, 2014). OCTA is responsible for planning and implementation of countywide transportation systems and projects. In this role, OCTA leads the effort to develop the LRTP as its vision for mobility of the next 20+ years. The LRTP is updated every 4 years to reflect changing demographics, economic trends, and mobility needs. As the proposed project is located predominantly within the City of Anaheim, and in and around the cities of Fullerton, Orange, and Xxxxx Xxxxx, planning with these local cities has been on-going. There is one residential development undergoing construction during preparation of the PA/ED on Riverdale Ave near XX XX-91 just west of Lakeview Ave in the City of Anaheim. Another redevelopment of a commercial property to a homeless shelter, also in Anaheim, is undergoing construction and occupancy during the preparation of the PA/ED on Xxxxxxx Place, adjacent to the XX XX-91 on-ramp at Xxxxxxx Blvd. Both developments would likely be completed by the time the SR-91 improvement project starts construction and coordination has been ongoing with the City of Anaheim. The ...
Sample 1
Local Planning. Alameda CTC is the designated Congestion Management Agency for Alameda County. Alameda CTC coordinates countywide transportation planning efforts; programs local, regional, state and federal funding; and delivers projects and programs including those approved by voters in Alameda County transportation expenditure plans for Measure B, Measure BB, and the Vehicle Registration Fee. The Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan (CWTP) is a long-range policy document that guides future transportation investments, programs, policies and advocacy for all of Alameda County through the year 2040. The CWTP identifies a number of future trends, issues and challenges for the County including safety, and more specifically, an increase in the number of collisions on roadways. The project has been assigned project number 030 in the CWTP. The project is also included in the 2014 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan. Both plans include the continued development of express lanes in Alameda County. The projects listed in Table 4-1 are the current and future projects on I-680 in the vicinity of the project that are part of the Caltrans SHOPP. Table 4-1: SHOPP Projects in Vicinity of the Project limits County EA Description Approximate Construction Cost Construction Date Ala 4K670 At the ramp terminus of the on-ramp to southbound I-680 and Sunol Blvd. Install left-turn channelization with signalization(PM 15.25). $4.0M 2021/22 Ala OP630 In Alameda County in Pleasanton at Stoneridge Drive – Construct Rock Slope protection at slip out. $1.5M 2020/21 Ala 4G113 In and near Fremont Pleasanton, and Dublin, from 0.3 mile south of Xxxxx Creek Road to 0.3 mile north of Alcosta Boulevard- Install ramp meters, ramp HOV bypass lanes and Traffic Operations Systems $40.4M 2018 Transit Study on I-680 The Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Valley Transit Authority (Wheels) and the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County Connection) currently operate bus routes that use the I-680 corridor. Separate from this project, Alameda CTC is conducting a transit study of the I-680 corridor to identify one or more public express bus service options along the I-680 corridor that would leverage the existing and planned HOV/express lanes. A continuous HOV/express lane system on I-680 would improve travel time and travel reliability for public transit, increasing the incentive for transit use in the corridor. In January 2019, Alameda CTC conducted a transit operator workshop to collect input from local transit p...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Local Planning

  • Procurement Planning Prior to the issuance of any invitations to bid for contracts, the proposed procurement plan for the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines. Procurement of all goods and works shall be undertaken in accordance with such procurement plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Vacation Planning The following general rules shall be observed in implementing the vacation planning program:

  • Family Planning The MCO must ensure that its network includes sufficient family planning providers to ensure timely access to covered family planning services for enrollees. Although family planning services are included within the MCO’s list of covered benefits, Medicaid enrollees are entitled to obtain all Medicaid covered family planning services without prior authorization through any Medicaid provider, who will bill the MCO and be paid on a FFS basis.4 The MCO must give each enrollee, including adolescents, the opportunity to use his/her own primary care provider or go to any family planning center for family planning services without requiring a referral. The MCO must make a reasonable effort to Subcontract with all local family planning clinics and providers, including those funded by Title X of the Public Health Services Act, and must reimburse providers for all family planning services regardless of whether they are rendered by a participating or non-participating provider. Unless otherwise negotiated, the MCO must reimburse providers of family planning services at the Medicaid rate. The MCO may, however, at its discretion, impose a withhold on a contracted primary care provider for such family planning services. The MCO may require family planning providers to submit claims or reports in specified formats before reimbursing services. MCOs must provide their Medicaid enrollees with sufficient information to allow them to make an informed choice including: the types of family planning services available, their right to access these services in a timely and confidential manner, and their freedom to choose a qualified family planning provider both within and outside the MCO’s network of providers. In addition, MCOs must ensure that network procedures for accessing family planning services are convenient and easily comprehensible to enrollees. MCOs must also educate enrollees regarding the positive impact of coordinated care on their health outcomes, so enrollees will prefer to access in-network services or, if they should decide to see out-of-network providers, they will agree to the exchange of medical information between providers for better coordination of care. In addition, MCOs are required to provide timely reimbursement for out-of-network family planning and related STD services consistent with services covered in their contracts. The reimbursement must be provided at least at the applicable West Virginia Medicaid FFS rate 4 Access to family planning services without prior notification is a federal law. Under OBRA 1987 Section 4113(c)(1)(B), “enrollment of an individual eligible for medical assistance in a primary case management system, a health maintenance organization or a similar entity must not restrict the choice of the qualified person, from whom the individual may receive services under Section 1905(a)(4)(c).” Therefore, Medicaid enrollees must be allowed freedom of choice of family planning providers and may receive such services from any family planning provider, including those outside the MCO’s provider network, without prior authorization. appropriate to the provider type (current family planning services fee schedule available from BMS). The MCO, its staff, contracted providers and its contractors that are providing cost, quality, or medical appropriateness reviews or coordination of benefits or subrogation must keep family planning information and records confidential in favor of the individual patient, even if the patient is a minor. The MCO, its staff, contracted providers and its contractors that are providing cost, quality, or medical appropriateness reviews, or coordination of benefits or subrogation must also keep family planning information and records received from non-participating providers confidential in favor of the individual patient even if the patient is a minor. Maternity services, hysterectomies, and pregnancy terminations are not considered family planning services.

  • Project Planning GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS; ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE; PUBLIC INFORMATION 30 4.1 Planning and Engineering Activities 30 4.2 Site Conditions 30 4.3 Governmental Approvals 30 4.4 Environmental Compliance 34 4.5 Community Outreach and Public Information 35

  • Protection Planning Annually, sub-geographic area Unit Administrators will determine efficiencies to be gained from reciprocal assistance and acquisition of protection services. Operating plans will document decisions. Plans should be reviewed, and agreement reached concerning such items as placement of crews, engines, air tankers, helicopters, fixed and aerial detection, regulated use, closures and other joint fire suppression efforts.

  • Exit Planning 6. The Grant Recipient will, in conjunction with the Authority, maintain, and as necessary update, the Exit Plan throughout the Funding Period so that it can be implemented immediately, if required. From time-to-time either the Authority or the Grant Recipient may instigate a review of the Exit Plan.

  • Business Continuity Planning Supplier shall prepare and maintain at no additional cost to Buyer a Business Continuity Plan (“BCP”). Upon written request of Buyer, Supplier shall provide a copy of Supplier’s BCP. The BCP shall be designed to ensure that Supplier can continue to provide the goods and/or services in accordance with this Order in the event of a disaster or other BCP-triggering event (as such events are defined in the applicable BCP). Supplier’s BCP shall, at a minimum, provide for: (a) the retention and retrieval of data and files; (b) obtaining resources necessary for recovery, (c) appropriate continuity plans to maintain adequate levels of staffing required to provide the goods and services during a disruptive event; (d) procedures to activate an immediate, orderly response to emergency situations; (e) procedures to address potential disruptions to Supplier’s supply chain; (f) a defined escalation process for notification of Buyer, within two (2) business days, in the event of a BCP-triggering event; and (g) training for key Supplier Personnel who are responsible for monitoring and maintaining Supplier’s continuity plans and records. Supplier shall maintain the BCP and test it at least annually or whenever there are material changes in Supplier’s operations, risks or business practices. Upon Xxxxx’s written and reasonable request, Supplier shall provide Buyer an executive summary of test results and a report of corrective actions (including the timing for implementation) to be taken to remedy any deficiencies identified by such testing. Upon Xxxxx’s request and with reasonable advance notice and conducted in such a manner as not to unduly interfere with Supplier’s operations, Supplier shall give Buyer and its designated agents access to Supplier’s designated representative(s) with detailed functional knowledge of Supplier’s BCP and relevant subject matter.

  • Strategic Planning Facilitate the effective alignment of IT requirements/ Information Resource Management (IRM) plans with strategic business plans and program initiatives. Management Improvements: Development and implementation of improved systems and business practices to optimize productivity and service delivery operations (e.g., analysis, and implementation of improvements in the flow of IT work and program processes and tool utilization, including business system analysis, identification of requirements for streamlining, re-engineering, or re-structuring internal systems/business processes for improvement, determination of IT solution alternatives, benchmarking).

  • Discharge Planning If further care at home or in another facility is appropriate following discharge from the Hospital, Blue Shield will work with the Member, the attending Physician and the Hospital discharge planners to determine the most appropriate and cost effective way to provide this care.

  • Selection Planning Prior to the issuance to consultants of any requests for proposals, the proposed plan for the selection of consultants under the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Consultant Guidelines. Selection of all consultants’ services shall be undertaken in accordance with such selection plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.