Local Performance Assessment Sample Clauses

Local Performance Assessment. Grantees must periodically review the performance data they report to SAMHSA (as required above), assess their progress, and use this information to improve management of their grant projects. The assessment should be designed to help you determine whether you are achieving the goals, objectives, and outcomes you intend to achieve and whether adjustments need to be made to your project. Performance assessments also should be used to determine whether your project is having/will have the intended impact on behavioral health disparities. You will be required to report on your progress achieved, barriers encountered, and efforts to overcome these barriers in a performance assessment report to be submitted at least annually. At a minimum, your performance assessment should include the required performance measures identified above. You may also consider outcome and process questions, such as the following: Outcome Questions: What was the effect of intervention on key outcome goals? What program/contextual/cultural/linguistic factors were associated with outcomes? What individual factors were associated with outcomes, including race/ethnicity/sexual identity (sexual orientation/gender identity)? How durable were the effects? Process Questions: How closely did implementation match the plan? What types of changes were made to the originally proposed plan? What types of changes were made to address behavioral health disparities, including the use of National CLAS Standards? What led to the changes in the original plan? What effect did the changes have on the planned intervention and performance assessment? Who provided (program staff) what services (modality, type, intensity, duration), to whom (individual characteristics), in what context (system, community), and at what cost (facilities, personnel, dollars)? No more than 20 percent of the total grant award may be used for data collection, performance measurement, and performance assessment, e.g., activities required in Sections I-2.4 and 2.5 above (see Appendix B).
Sample 1Sample 2See All (16)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Local Performance Assessment. Grantees must periodically review the performance data they report to SAMHSA (as required above), assess their progress, and use this information to improve management of their grant projects. The community readiness assessment is designed to help determine whether you are achieving the goals, objectives and outcomes you intend to achieve and whether adjustments need to be made to your project. Community readiness assessments should be used also to determine whether your project is having/will have the intended impact on behavioral health disparities. You will be required to report on your progress achieved, barriers encountered, and efforts to overcome these barriers in a performance assessment report to be submitted annually. Grantees should use the community readiness assessment to find out: • Whether they are reaching the goals they set for the grant. • Whether the grant is having the impact they want it to have in their community. • Whether community readiness scores are rising in key dimensions. • Whether they need to make adjustments to their project. Grantees will be required to report on their progress, challenges they’ve faced, and what they’ve done to overcome those challenges in a report that should be submitted at least two times per grant year. The grantee’s SAMHSA Government Project Officer will work with them on the format of this report after the grant has been awarded. No more than 20 percent of the total grant award may be used for data collection, performance measurement, and performance assessment, e.g., activities required in Sections I-2.3 and 2.4 above. Be sure to include these costs in your proposed budget (see Appendix II).
Sample 1
Local Performance Assessment. Grantees are required to review the performance data they report to SAMHSA (as required above) to assess their progress and use this information to improve the management of their grant projects. The performance assessment currently required will need to also include any of the enhancement/expansion activities that occur as a result of this grant. You will be required to report on your progress achieved, barriers encountered, and efforts to overcome these barriers in a performance assessment report to be submitted at least annually. The performance assessment for this project will be included in the current assessment that is submitted annually to SAMHSA as a supplement to the continuation application. No more than 20 percent of the up to 25 percent expended for state infrastructure may be used by the grantee for data collection, performance measurement, and performance assessment, e.g., activities required in Sections I-2.2 and 2.3 above. Each sub-awardee may use up to 10 percent of its funds for data collection and performance measurement, and performance assessment (see Sections I-2.2 and 2.3).
Sample 1
Local Performance Assessment. Grantees must periodically review the performance data they report to SAMHSA (as required above), assess their progress, and use this information to improve management of their grant projects. The assessment should be designed to help you determine whether you are achieving the goals, objectives, and outcomes you intend to achieve and whether adjustments need to be made to your project. Performance assessments also should be used to determine whether your project is having/will have the intended impact on behavioral health disparities. You will be required to report on your progress achieved, barriers encountered, and efforts to overcome these barriers in a performance assessment report to be submitted at least annually. You will also be required to participate in monthly conference calls with a GPO to discuss current progress as well as for review and feedback about performance assessments. Grantees will also be asked to demonstrate the impact of grant activities by measuring the competence/confidence of health care clinical staff at the baseline, during the grant, and the grant’s end. The impact of grant activities on skills in the following areas must be measured:  Assessment of suicide risk and protective factors;  Formulation of a risk summary to inform the choice of intervention;  Use of best-practice interventions to ensure safety, including lethal means safety, treatment of suicide risk, and follow-up to ensure continuity of care;  Suicide deaths and suicide attempts within the healthcare system. At a minimum, your performance assessment should include the required performance measures identified above. You may also consider outcome and process questions, such as the following: Outcome Questions:  How has the embedding of Zero Suicide into the healthcare system impacted suicidal behavior for individuals receiving treatment?  Did some elements of the Zero Suicide model have greater impact than other elements?  What were the suicidal behavior outcomes, including deaths by suicide and suicide attempts, especially through EHR or data management systems?  What individual factors were associated with outcomes, including race/ethnicity/sexual orientation/gender identity?  How durable were the effects? As appropriate, describe how the data, including outcome data, will be analyzed by racial/ethnic and sexual and gender minority groups or other demographic factors to ensure that appropriate populations are being served and that disparities in servi...
Sample 1
Local Performance Assessment. Grantees must develop an Evaluation Plan as part of the Comprehensive Expansion Plan to be submitted six months after award. The Evaluation Plan should be designed to help grantees assess their progress and use this information to improve management of their grant. The assessment should be designed to help you determine whether you are achieving the goals, objectives, and outcomes you intend to achieve and whether adjustments need to be made to your project. Performance assessments should also be used to determine whether your project is having/will have the intended impact on behavioral health disparities. You will be required to report on your progress achieved, barriers encountered, and efforts to overcome these barriers in an Evaluation Report to be submitted annually. Your Evaluation Plan (and Reports) must include both process and outcomes evaluation components. Examples of process evaluation components include: number of providers or stakeholders trained; number of products developed; technical assistance provided to communities or partners; partnerships/collaborative activities initiated; numbers of children/parents screened and number of children/families served. As part of the outcome evaluation, all grantees must also select one systems outcome, one child or family outcome, and a community- or population-level indicator for at least one of the identified outcomes. Examples of systems outcomes grantees might consider include: measures of collaboration;, social network analyses; workforce development outcomes such as changes in provider practice; policy changes; and infrastructure changes such as the development of integrated data systems. Examples of child/family outcomes that grantees might consider include: improved parent-child interactions; decreased parental stress; decreased parental depression; improvements in children’s social skills; and decreased child behavior problems. Examples of community- or population-level indicators include: rates of children expelled from child care; rates of parental depression; and proportion of policies focused on child health and safety. Grantees must measure outcomes using the most rigorous methods feasible, and must include the collection of baseline data. The Evaluation Plan requires review and approval by the Government Project Officer. The annual Evaluation Reports will be reviewed by the Government Project Officer and discussed with the grantee annually. No less than 15 percent and no more than 20 per...
Sample 1

Related to Local Performance Assessment

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Purpose: To provide the policy and procedures for assessing employee performance and communicating the results of assessment to the employee and to others using assessment information in personnel decisions, and further to express the mutual commitment of the parties to the University’s values.

  • Employee Performance Review When a formal review of an employee’s performance is made, the employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to discuss, sign and make written comments on the review form in question and the employee is to receive a signed copy to indicate that its contents have been read. An employee shall be entitled to a minimum of two (2) work days to review the performance review prior to providing any response to the Employer, verbally or in writing, with respect to the evaluation.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.