LMAPD Program Indicators Number of Participants Sample Clauses

LMAPD Program Indicators Number of Participants. 1. Number of people actively participating in programs 3,439 2. Number of people successfully completing programs 523 3. Number of people who progress in interventions leading 1,329 to employment 4. Number of people employed 783 5. Number of people maintained in employment in the 122 case of vocational crisis 18 Annual Report 2014– 2015 The following table provides information on the number of hours and types of employment for participants during 2014/15. Some participants were employed by more than one employer and are counted more than once. MARKETABILITIES PROGRAM 2014/15
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
LMAPD Program Indicators Number of Participants. 1. Number of people actively participating in programs 3,744 2. Number of people successfully completing programs 657 3. Number of people completing employment preparation programs, who subsequently progress to other 1,488 interventions leading to employment 4. Number of people employed 931 5. Number of people maintained in employment in the 132 case of vocational crisis The following table provides information on the number of hours and types of employment for participants during 2009/10. Some participants were employed by more than one employer and are counted more than once. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM 2009/10 Type of Employment1 Number of Participants 1-15 hours per week, casual or seasonal 81 1-15 hours per week, term 20 1-15 hours per week, permanent 61 16-30 hours per week, casual or seasonal 65 16-30 hours per week, term 62 16-30 hours per week, permanent 250 31 or more hours per week, casual or seasonal 26 31 or more hours per week, term 43 31 or more hours per week, permanent 342 Total 950 16 Information is also provided on the reasons participants did not complete or progress in their programs during 2009/10, as determined by their Vocational Counsellor. Some participants had more than one reason and are counted more than once. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM 2009/10 Reason for Not Completing Program Number of Participants Continuing in plan 1,347 Plan in development 598 Found employment 142 Disability-related reasons 914 Family / personal matter 512 Other funding not available 18 Could not access program of choice 44 No longer interested in program or plan 368 Other source of funding 31 Moved 81 Retired 6 Deceased 20 Other 316 Don’t Know 92 Total 4,489 VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM 2009/10 Reason for Not Progressing in Program Number of Participants Plan in development 347 Disability-related reasons 646 Family / personal matter 350 Lack of motivation 257 Voluntary withdrawal 234 Supports / funding not available 34 Other 238 Don’t Know 144 Total 2,250 17 Expenditures The following table provides a breakdown of Vocational Rehabilitation Program expenditures eligible for cost-sharing under the LMAPD for 2009/10. VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM 2009/10 Component Administration Expenditures ($000) Program Total Administration 1,594.0 0.0 1,594.0 Service Coordination 0.0 5,310.6 5,310.6 Training* 0.0 1,932.2 1,932.2 Total $ 1,594.0 7,242.8 8,836.8 % 18.0 82.0 100.0 * In 2008/09, funding to the Employment and Training Centres changed fro...
Sample 1See All (4)

Related to LMAPD Program Indicators Number of Participants

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Number of Participants 4. The Grantee shall establish written policies and procedures governing all State Aid Commitment Diversion programs and services Grantee provides.

  • Number of Students 6.2.2.1.1 Except as herein provided, Instructors shall have at any time no more than an average of thirty-five (35) students per instructional section, averaged over all instructional sections assigned to the instructor.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Number of Stewards The Union may designate one (1), but no more than one (1), xxxxxxx on each shift for each of the Employer's principal work areas from among those employees who work therein.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:

  • Salary Progression 1. For the purposes of determining annual progression from one step to the next, each teacher’s performance will be assessed annually against the appropriate professional standards.

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.