Literature Selection & Prioritization Sample Clauses

Literature Selection & Prioritization. For the development of the Inventory of impact of physical chemical properties on (eco)toxicological endpoints data were collected from peer-reviewed public literature. The literature was selected and prioritized. Then the data from the literature was entered into the database. Publication searching was carried out in Scopus. For literature papers on toxicity of nanoparticles the following search terms were used: “(TITLE-ABS-KEY(*nano* *tox*) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY(eco*)) AND DOCTYPE(ar) AND (EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "MATE") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "CENG") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ENGI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "PHYS")) AND (EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "EART")) AND (EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "SOCI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ENER") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "MATH") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "COMP") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ARTS") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "BUSI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "PSYC") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "DECI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ECON") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "SOCI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ENER") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "MATH") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "COMP") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ARTS") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "BUSI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "PSYC") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "DECI") OR EXCLUDE(SUBJAREA, "ECON")) AND (LIMIT-TO(LANGUAGE, "English")) AND (LIMITTO( PUBYEAR, “PUBYEAR”)) For literature papers on ecotoxicity of nanoparticles the following search terms were used: TITLE-ABS-KEY(*nano*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(*eco*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY(*tox*)) AND DOCTYPE(ar) AND (LIMIT-TO(PUBYEAR, “PUBYEAR”)) The results of each search (per publication year) were stored in a .bibtex file including “all available information”. These files were uploaded in the NANoREG WP6 literature database in specific queries. After uploading of the .bibtex file the database can extract the reference information and abstract from the .bibtex file and store it in the database. After the literature was collected, it was further selected and prioritized according to the below criteria by reviewing the reference and abstract: - The article should be published in English (in search); - The article should be the primary source of data (manual); - The article should be presented as a full article (in search); - The title and abstract are checked for relevance for inclusion based on the following criteria (manual); o Is the paper regarding a nanomaterial of interest; o Does the paper contain information relevant for biological activity; - Studies that contain a good physical chemical characterization are assessed with higher priority (manual) Some of these cr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Literature Selection & Prioritization

  • POST ONLINE PUBLIC AUCTION PROCEDURES 4.1. Successful E-bidders shall and undertake to sign the Memorandum of Sale at the office of the Auctioneer within 3 working days from the date of auction, failing which the deposit paid will be forfeited to the Assignee bank and the sale will be deemed cancelled/terminated and the property may be put up again for subsequent auction without further notice to the said E-Bidders. The Auctioneer shall send the Memorandum of Sale for stamping and thereafter forward the same together with the required deposit paid under Clause 2.4 above and the differential sum paid under this clause (if any) to the Assignee bank.

  • ONLINE PUBLIC AUCTION PROCESS 2.1. E-Bidders may browse through the PAH Website and select the properties they wish to bid online.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Planning Prior to the issuance to consultants of any requests for proposals, the proposed plan for the selection of consultants under the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Consultant Guidelines. Selection of all consultants’ services shall be undertaken in accordance with such selection plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Root-­‐zone Information Publication ICANN’s publication of root-­‐zone contact information for the TLD will include Registry Operator and its administrative and technical contacts. Any request to modify the contact information for the Registry Operator must be made in the format specified from time to time by ICANN at xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/domains/root/.

  • Induction Procedures a) The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that it is in the interests of the industry that all new employees and employers on a building project understand their obligations to this Agreement and are introduced to their jobs in a manner which will help them work safely and efficiently.

  • zone Information Publication ICANN’s publication of root-zone contact information for the TLD will include Registry Operator and its administrative and technical contacts. Any request to modify the contact information for the Registry Operator must be made in the format specified from time to time by ICANN at xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/domains/root/.

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.