Joint Planning and Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. The parties believe it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are interrelated and sequenced. We will carry out the following joint planning and evaluation process, a two-year agreement covering FY 08-09. Actions Annual Milestones
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. 40 CFR 35.115 requires the Illinois EPA and U.S. EPA to develop a process for jointly evaluating the workplan components and activities agreed to under this PPA. The evaluation process will include:
Sample 1Sample 2
Joint Planning and Evaluation Process. Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 both agree that it is important to clearly articulate how all the components of the performance partnership are evaluated. In order to evaluate this agreement, both agencies will participate in a joint planning and evaluation process. The process timeline is as follows: Actions Deadlines Senior Management Planning Meeting (2013-2015 PPA) June 2013 Ohio EPA/USEPA Program-to-Program Meetings (2013-2015 PPA) August 2013 Workplan Negotiation (2013-2015 PPA) August 2013 Draft PPA Finalized (2013-2015 PPA) September 2013 2013-2015 PPA Begins October 1, 2013 Joint Assessment Process Meeting July 2014 Joint Assessment Process Conditions Report December 30, 2014 USEPA R5’s Evaluation of Report February 2015 2013-2015 PPA Final Environmental Conditions Report December 2015 Senior Management Planning Meeting (2015-2017 PPA) April 2015 Ohio EPA/USEPA Program-to-Program Meetings (2015-2017 PPA) April/May 2015 Workplan Negotiation (2015-2017 PPA) April 2015 Draft PPA Finalized (2015-2017 PPA) June 2015 2015-2017 PPA Begins October 1, 2015 Joint Assessment Process Meeting July 2016 Joint Assessment Process Conditions Report December 30, 2016 USEPA R5’s Evaluation of Report February 2017 2013-2015 PPA Final Environmental Conditions Report December 2017 The joint assessment process for this agreement will: • Allow for a check in at the mid-term Joint Assessment Process Meeting to determine if revisions or additions to the document are necessary to reflect changes in Ohio EPA and USEPA needs; • Provide general discussion, measurements of outcomes and analyze the environmental and programmatic results of each element; • Identify emerging issues, environmental trends and strategies for improvement; • Provide flexibility in both form and substance, as warranted by program performance; • Seek to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary efforts and reporting; • Respond with appropriate solutions, including redirecting goals and resources; • Encourage Ohio EPA to find innovative program implementation alternatives, as long as the desired result is able to be measured and achieved. The success of each outcome of this agreement relies on clear, constructive communication and the commitment of Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 to work together to implement Ohio EPA’s Plan-Do-Check- Improve model (now Quality Services through Partnership model), to solve problems and improve the programs. If any differences exist on specific issues or problems, Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 should move...
Sample 1

Related to Joint Planning and Evaluation Process

  • INTERNET PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS ‌ Job Title: Internet/Web Engineer Job#: 2620 General Characteristics Integrally involved in the development and support of all Internet/Intranet/Extranet sites and supporting systems. Works closely with other IT groups and customers to define the system design and user interface based on customer needs and objectives. Participates in all phases of the development and implementation process, and may act as a project manager on special projects. Ensures the integration of the Web servers and all other supporting systems. Responsible for system tuning, optimization of information/data processing, maintenance and support of the production environment.

  • Procurement Planning Prior to the issuance of any invitations to bid for contracts, the proposed procurement plan for the Project shall be furnished to the Association for its review and approval, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines. Procurement of all goods and works shall be undertaken in accordance with such procurement plan as shall have been approved by the Association, and with the provisions of said paragraph 1.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Planning GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS; ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE; PUBLIC INFORMATION 30 4.1 Planning and Engineering Activities 30 4.2 Site Conditions 30 4.3 Governmental Approvals 30 4.4 Environmental Compliance 34 4.5 Community Outreach and Public Information 35

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.