Investigation Findings Sample Clauses

Investigation Findings. A summary of the investigation findings, if requested, will be made available to the faculty member and SVCFT within thirty (30) business days of the conclusion of the investigation. A request for disclosure of any investigation report filed by the assigned investigator will be filled by the College pursuant to state and federal disclosure laws.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Investigation Findings. A summary of the investigation findings will be made available to the faculty member within thirty (30) business days of the conclusion of the investigation and before any disciplinary action is taken. Third-party requests for disclosure of any investigation report filed by the assigned investigator will be filled by the District pursuant to state and federal disclosure laws. The faculty member will be notified at least one day prior to the release of any investigation findings to any third party.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Investigation Findings. 1. When the investigation results in sustained charges of violation of department policy, the employee and the Association, upon request, shall be given a copy of the investigation, including all material facts of the matter. If available, such information will be provided in an electronic format (i.e. PDF or other protected format).
Sample 1Sample 2
Investigation Findings. 1. When the investigation results in charges that the employee has violated City or Department policy, the employee, upon request, shall be given a copy of the summary report of the investigation upon completion.
Sample 1
Investigation Findings. There is no sufficient information provided by the complainant to make sure that the concerned barges are related to this project. • Date of the observed impact was not specified by the complainant so the impact air quality monitoring (IAQM) results available for August 2014 for monitoring stations close to the concerned area – AQMS1, ASR1, ASR5, ASR6 and ASR10 have been reviewed and there was no impact air quality monitoring result that shows 1-hour TSP or 24-hour TSP exceeded the action (AL)/limit level (LL). 1 • Photo record below shows that Sand barges are equipped with watering equipments. And watering equipment was used to keep the sand filling material wet. • 1 Reviewed IAQM data and the action (AL)/limit level (LL) is available online respectively at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/php/list_air_year_All.php,and xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/emna_report/tmclkl_hy201208/manual/html/toc.htm - In addition, site inspection has been jointly conducted with the Contractor and RSS on 28 August 2014, but no generation of fugitive dust was observed to be caused by barges loaded with filling material.
Sample 1
Investigation Findings. There is no sufficient information provided by the complainant to make sure that the concerned barges are related to this project. • Date of the observed impact was not specified by the complainant so the impact air quality monitoring (IAQM) results available for August 2014 and early September 2014 for monitoring stations close to the concerned area – AQMS1, ASR1, ASR5, ASR6 and ASR10 have been reviewed and there was no impact air quality monitoring result that shows 1-hour TSP or 24-hour TSP exceeded the action (AL)/limit level (LL). • Photo record below shows that sand barges were not covered but they are equipped with watering equipment and in order to prevent generation of fugitive dust, watering equipment was used to keep the sand filling material wet. • In addition, site inspection has been jointly conducted with the Contractor and RSS on 28 August and 4 September 2014, but no generation of fugitive dust was observed to be caused by barges loaded with filling material. Transfer of sand between vessels was not observed.
Sample 1
Investigation Findings. There is no sufficient information provided by the complainant to make sure that the concerned barges are related to this project. • Date of the observed impact was not specified by the complainant so the impact air quality monitoring (IAQM) results within the complaint period 1- 15 October 2014 for monitoring stations close to the concerned area – AQMS1, ASR1, ASR5, ASR6 and ASR10 have been reviewed and there was one action level exceedance of 24hr TSP on impact air quality monitoring result recorded at ASR1 but no information which shows that the action level exceedance at ASR1 is related to vessel of this Contract. IAQM data AQMS1, ASR1, ASR5, ASR6 and ASR10 also available online from: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/php/list_air_year_All.php) • As informed by the Contractor, the Contractor would continue to provide watering to stockpile of sand on sand delivery barges. • Photo record below shows that sand barges were not covered but they are equipped with watering equipment and in order to prevent generation of fugitive dust, watering equipment was used to keep the sand filling material wet. • In addition, site inspections were conducted jointly with RSS, IEC and the Contractor on 16 October 2014 and jointly with RSS and the Contractor on 23 October 2014, but no generation of fugitive dust was observed to be caused by barges loaded with filling material. • Sand barges usually moor at around Sham Xxxx Xxx anchorage area and the Contractor would continue to provide watering to stockpile of sand on sand delivery barges, therefore the potential impact to resident areas concerned by the complainant is low. • The Contractor usually moor vessel at around Sham Xxxx Xxx anchorage area (Except upon request by HK government and under this circumstances, then they will moor at Tuen Xxx xxxxxx shortly for inspection.)
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Investigation Findings. Spot check of travel route record also shows that that sand delivering vessels follow a designated marine travel route. However, only in particular cases, those vessels will moor near sea area off Butterfly beach for government department to carry out inspection. In general, the sand delivery barges were requested by the Contractor to moor as far away from residence as possible and continue to provide watering to stockpile of sand on sand delivery barges. • Impact water quality monitoring (IWQM) results recorded in September and October 2014 which cover IWQM station(s) - IS14, IS15 and SR9 which are near to the concern area(s), have been reviewed. However no IWQM exceedance was noted in September and October 2014 at monitoring station IS14, IS15 and SR9 which are near to the concern area(s). (IWQM data of IS14, IS15 and SR9 available online at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/php/list_water_year.php ) • In addition, site inspections were conducted jointly with RSS, IEC and the Contractor on 16 October 2014 and jointly with RSS and the Contractor on 23 October 2014, but no leakage of sand material or generation of fugitive dust was observed to be caused by barges loaded with sand material. • In addition, sand delivery barges are equipped with watering equipment and in order to prevent generation of fugitive dust, watering equipment was used to keep the sand filling material wet. • Nonetheless, as informed by the Contractor, the Contractor would study the feasibility of covering stockpile of sand on sand delivery barges.
Sample 1

Related to Investigation Findings

  • Complaints Investigation ‌ An employee who complains of harassment under the provisions of the Human Rights Code of British Columbia may refer the complaint to either one or other of the following processes:

  • Formal Investigation Once the matter has been brought to the attention of the Store executive, an internal investigation of the complaint will be conducted at which time the complainant will be requested to present, in writing, the particulars of the harassment. Such internal investigation will be initiated no later than ten (10) business days of the matter being brought to the attention of the Store executive, and shall be concluded no later than thirty (30) business days of the initiation of the investigation. Any extension of the aforementioned time frames must have the agreement of the complainant and the union if the complainant has chosen to involve it. Based on the outcome of the investigation, which will be provided in writing upon the completion of the investigation, to both the complainant and the union, should the complainant consent to this disclosure, it will be determined if there has been a breach of Company policy on harassment, and the appropriate action will be taken in the event that harassment is determined to have occurred. STEP THREE - SUBSEQUENT INCIDENTS Subsequent incidents should immediately be reported and followed by a written description to the most senior store executive involved in Step Two for further investigation and disciplinary action, if confirmed, with a copy to the union Chairperson with the consent of the complainant. After all steps of the Harassment Protection Policy have been exhausted, if the incident has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the employee, the employee may file a grievance at Step 2 of the grievance procedure.

  • COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATIONS 1. This article applies to complaints or allegations made externally and not from normal supervisory activities.

  • Independent Investigation Subscriber, in making the decision to purchase the Units, has relied upon an independent investigation of the Company and has not relied upon any information or representations made by any third parties or upon any oral or written representations or assurances from the Company, its officers, directors or employees or any other representatives or agents of the Company, other than as set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber is familiar with the business, operations and financial condition of the Company and has had an opportunity to ask questions of, and receive answers from the Company’s officers and directors concerning the Company and the terms and conditions of the offering of the Units and has had full access to such other information concerning the Company as Subscriber has requested. Subscriber confirms that all documents that it has requested have been made available and that Subscriber has been supplied with all of the additional information concerning this investment which Subscriber has requested.

  • Geotechnical Investigation Perform in accordance with the City Design Manual and other City requirements as designated in writing by the Director.

  • Background Investigations OSC policy requires that background investigations be conducted on Contractor Staff who will have access to OSC’s IT systems, access to OSC confidential information/data, or routine access to any OSC facility. For purposes of this policy, “routine access” is defined as access to an OSC facility for five consecutive business days or 10 business days over the annual term of the engagement. Accordingly, with the signing of this Agreement, the Contractor certifies that it has or will conduct a background investigation on Staff to whom the policy applies within the 12 months prior to the Staff commencing Services under this Agreement. The Contractor agrees to undertake a background investigation of any new/replacement Staff during the term of the Agreement. At a minimum, background investigations shall include a review/evaluation of the following: • identity verification, including Social Security Number search; • employment eligibility, including verification of U.S. citizenship or legal immigration status where appropriate; • criminal history/court records (Federal, State and local for the past five years); • work experience/history for the past five years; • pertinent skills, qualifications, and education/professional credentials; and • references. The Contractor must obtain the consent of its Staff to allow OSC, upon request: (i) to review the background investigation records, including all supporting documentation, and (ii) to conduct its own background investigation. Only Staff who have passed the background investigation, and provided such consent shall be assigned to provide Services to OSC under this Agreement. During the term of the Agreement, and in accordance with Appendix A (Section 10, Records), the Contractor must maintain records related to the background investigations performed.

  • Cooperation with Investigations You agree to cooperate with us in the investigation of unusual transactions, poor quality transmissions, and resolution of customer claims, including by providing, upon request and without further cost, any originals or copies of items deposited through the Service in your possession and your records relating to such items and transmissions.

  • Grievance Investigations Where an employee has asked or is obliged to be represented by the Institute in relation to the presentation of a grievance and an employee acting on behalf of the Institute wishes to discuss the grievance with that employee, the employee and the representative of the employee will, where operational requirements permit, be given reasonable leave with pay for this purpose when the discussion takes place in the headquarters area of such employee and leave without pay when it takes place outside the headquarters area of such employee.

  • BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION The BOARD is prohibited from knowingly employing a person who has been convicted of committing or attempting to commit certain criminal offenses. If the required criminal background investigation is not completed at the time this Contract is signed, and the subsequent investigation report reveals that there has been a prohibited conviction, this Contract shall immediately become null and void.

  • Disciplinary Investigations An employee who is the subject of a disciplinary investigation shall be informed in writing when the investigation is complete and of the determination of the investigation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.