Introduction of Quantifiers and Negations Sample Clauses

Introduction of Quantifiers and Negations. In the preliminary implementation of Sentiment Analysis, we have started with dictionary-based polarity detection, with no regard for the syntactic context of the polar words. In this phase, we take into account this context by marking quantifiers and negations listed in an in-house dictionary. We take into account quantifiers and negations in the aggregate polarity calculation in the same way as Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx et al. (2013) (see also Deliverable D4.1 p46). Quantifiers are only used to distinguish sentiment words which act as quantifiers, such as pretty in pretty mad. The word pretty is both a positive polar word and a quantifier. We want its polarity to be positive in case it occurs in isolation, but less than one so that the sum with a following negative polar word (such as mad) be negative. On the contrary, the presence of negations may reverse the aggregate polarity of the segment. and Table 10 show the effect of taking into account quantifiers and negations in the aggregate polarity calculation, respectively on the detection of opinionated tweets and on the polarity classification (positive or negative) of these opinionated tweets. We observe that negations and quantifiers have little impact on the detection of opinionated opinionated tweets (Table 9: Detection of opinionated tweets without taking into account (“Without”) and taking into account (“With”) negations and quantifiers ). Taking negations into account allows an improvement of the classification of negative tweets, but at the cost of a worsening of the classification of positive ones (Table 10: Precision, Recall and F-measure for polarity classification without taking into account (“Without”) and taking into account (“With”) negations and quantifiers; POS and NEG refer to the positive and negative classes). Opinion Finder SenticNet LIWC Without With Without With Without With Precision (%) 73.3 73.4 75.3 75.3 75.2 75.2 Recall (%) 68.5 68.3 37.0 36.8 33.7 33.7 F-measure (%) 70.9 70.8 49.6 49.4 46.5 46.5 Table 9: Detection of opinionated tweets without taking into account (“Without”) and taking into account (“With”) negations and quantifiers‌ Opinion Finder SenticNet LIWC Without With Without With Without With Precision (%) POS 76.6 74.7 91.3 88.1 57.0 57.0 NEG 50.2 52.6 26.0 31.9 65.5 65.5 Recall (%) POS 86.9 87.2 85.7 86.3 86.4 86.4 NEG 33.3 32.5 38.1 35.5 28.4 28.4 F-measure (%) POS 81.5 80.4 88.4 87.2 68.7 68.6 NEG 40.0 40.2 30.9 33.6 39.6 39.6 Table 10: Precision, Recall and F-measure f...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Introduction of Quantifiers and Negations

  • Specific Order Processes and Requirements 1. Distributor will order Software from SAP using and filling out completely such forms and minimum order requirements as SAP may prescribe from time to time and must comply with any then-current order process for the specific Software product. Where applicable, Distributor agrees to use the electronic means provided by SAP for placing orders.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: Procurement Method

  • Introduction and Background 1.1 The purpose of this Schedule 2 (Contract Services and Contract Supplies) is to set out the characteristics of the Contract Services and/or Contract Supplies (as the case may be) and Funding that the Provider will be required to make available to all Contracting Authorities in relation to Lot 1 and/or Lot 2 (as the case may be) and to provide a description of what the Contract Services and/or Contract Supplies (as the case may be) and Funding will entail.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works International Competitive Bidding. Goods and works shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive Bidding.

  • Specific Requirements 7.4.1 Workers’ compensation insurance with statutory limits required by South Dakota law. Coverage B-Employer’s Liability coverage of not less than $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease-policy limit, and $500,000 disease-each employee.

  • Grievance on Layoffs and Recalls Grievances concerning layoffs and recalls shall be initiated at Step 2 of the grievance procedure.

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • Contracting Information Requirements Contractor represents and warrants that it will comply with the requirements of Section 552.372(a) of the Texas Government Code. Except as provided by Section 552.374(c) of the Texas Government Code, the requirements of Subchapter J (Additional Provisions Related to Contracting Information), Chapter 552 of the Government Code, may apply to the Contract and the Contractor agrees that the Contract can be terminated if the Contractor knowingly or intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of that subchapter.

  • Specifications and Standards a) All articles supplied shall strictly conform to the specifications, trademark laid down in the bidding document and wherever articles have been required according to ISI/ ISO/ other applicable specifications/ certifications/ standards, those articles should conform strictly to those specifications/ certifications/ standards. The supply shall be of best quality and description. The decision of the competent authority/ purchase committee whether the articles supplied conforms to the specifications shall be final and binding on the supplier/ selected bidder.

  • Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Whitesville Central School District and Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association (2003) Employer Name: Whitesville Central School District Union: Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association Local: Effective Date: 07/01/2003 Expiration Date: 06/30/2006 PERB ID Number: 10699 Unit Size: Number of Pages: 23 For additional research information and assistance, please visit the Research page of the Catherwood website - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/library/research/ For additional information on the ILR School - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/ AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT STAFF ASSOCIATION AND THE WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY 1, 2003 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE TITLE PAGE Preamble 1 I Recognition 1 II Collective Bargaining U n i t 1 III Dues/Agency Fee Ckoffand Payroll Deduction 1 IV Rights of Employees 2 V Rights of Employer ------------- 2 VI Personnel F i l e 2 VII Employee Definitions 3 VIII Permanent Status/Seniority 4 IX Wages 5 X Overtime 7 XI Vacation 7 XII Holidays 8 XIII Sick Leave and Leavesof A b s e n c e 8 XIV Conference, Workshops,Required Courses 10 XV Meal Allowance and M i l e a g e 11 XVI Retirement 11 XVII Insurance 12 XVIII Cafeteria P l a n 14 .XIX Uniform Allowance------------------ 14 XX Hours of W o r k 14 XXI Transfers/Promotions 15 XXII Job Descriptions 15 XXIII Grievance Procedure 15 XIV Copies of the Contract 18 XV Zipper C x x x x x 18 XXVI Legislative Clause 18 XXVII Duration 19 SIGNATURES 19 APPENDIX A Grievance F o r m 20 APPENDIX B Dues Authorization F o r m 21

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.