Introduction and Background Sample Clauses

Introduction and Background. 1.1 The purpose of this Schedule 2 (Contract Services and Contract Supplies) is to set out the characteristics of the Contract Services and/or Contract Supplies (as the case may be) and Funding that the Provider will be required to make available to all Contracting Authorities in relation to Lot 1 and/or Lot 2 (as the case may be) and to provide a description of what the Contract Services and/or Contract Supplies (as the case may be) and Funding will entail.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Introduction and Background. ENIP2 owns one operating nuclear powered steam generating station (“IP2”) at the Indian Point site in the Village of Xxxxxxxx, New York, ENIP3 owns a second such station (“IP3”) at the same location, and ENOI operates both stations. IP2 and IP3, together with all activities necessary to support IP2 and IP3, are sometimes collectively referred to herein as “Indian Point.” XXXX0, XXXX0, and ENOI hold current, effective facility operating licenses (“OLs”) from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) for IP2 and IP3. In 2007, ENIP2, ENIP3, and ENOI applied to the NRC for renewal of the IP2 and IP3 OLs for an additional 20 years, and they are currently engaged in proceedings before the NRC (including the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (“ASLB”)) for such renewal (the “NRC Proceedings”). The docket numbers for the NRC Proceedings are 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR. The AG and Riverkeeper, among others, have been participating in the NRC Proceedings. They have been admitted as intervenor parties and have raised procedural and substantive objections in the NRC Proceedings to the relicensing of IP2 and IP3. NYSDEC, Riverkeeper, ENIP2, and ENIP3, among other individuals and entities (including ENOI with respect to (ii) below), are parties to consolidated, mandatory adjudicatory proceedings before a panel of NYSDEC Administrative Law Judges (the “ALJs”) relating to (i) certain NYSDEC-Staff proposed modifications to the renewed State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“SPDES”) Permit for Indian Point, and (ii) NYSDEC Staff’s proposed denial of Entergy’s application for a Water Quality Certificate (“WQC”) under Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”) (the proceedings relating to (i) and (ii) collectively referred to as the “NYSDEC Matter”) for purposes of the IP2 and IP3 OL renewals. ENIP2 and ENIP3 hold a current, effective SPDES permit and WQC. ENOI, ENIP2, ENIP3, and NYSDOS have been engaged in proceedings and other actions relating to compliance by Indian Point with the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (“CZMA”), in the context of IP2 and IP3 OL renewal. The CZMA issues involving Indian Point and IP2 and IP3 OL renewal that are being or have been addressed by NYSDOS and are pending before the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York are referred to as the “CZMA Matter.” The Parties, as relevant to the particular proceedings and actions in which the...
Introduction and Background. ‌ The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is an agency that enriches life through science. Our reach goes from the surface of the sun to the depths of the ocean floor as we work to keep citizens informed of the changing environment around them. We provide environmental intelligence for the nation. From daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings, and climate monitoring to fisheries management, coastal restoration, and maintaining marine commerce, NOAA’s products and services support economic vitality and more than one-third of America’s gross domestic product. The people of NOAA use research and tools to provide citizens, planners, emergency managers, and other decision makers with reliable and timely environmental intelligence.
Introduction and Background. 1. Plaintiffs, Xxxxx Xxxxxx and the other named Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”), are deaf and hard of hearing inmates incarcerated in facilities under the control of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”).1 Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit against Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx in his official capacity as director of IDOC. Pursuant to prior Court order and Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Xx. Xxxxxxx, who is no longer the Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, has been replaced as Defendant by Xxxx Xxxxxxx, the current Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections.
Introduction and Background. On August 31, 2005, Pioneer Natural Resources Alaska, Inc. (Pioneer), as the designated NE Storms unit operator, filed the NE Storms Unit application (Application) with the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), on behalf of itself and the other majority working interest owner (WIO), ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. (ConocoPhillips). The proposed unit is located on the North Slope, approximately 1-2 miles southwest of the Prudhoe Bay Unit (PBU). The proposed unit area covers approximately 16,456 acres within seven individual State of Alaska oil and gas leases. Approval of the proposed NE Storms Unit Agreement (Agreement) would conform and modify the lease contracts to be consistent with the Agreement, and extend the term of leases for as long as they are subject to the Agreement. Five of the leases in the proposed unit area were offered in the North Slope Areawide 2003 Oil and Gas Lease Sale, held on October 29, 2003. DNR issued oil and gas leases ADL 390472 (Tract 1), ADL 390473 (Tract 2), ADL 390492 (Tract 5), ADL 390497 (Tract 6), and ADL 390496 (Tract 7), effective May 1, 2004, on State of Alaska lease form number DOG 200204 (rev. 10/2003), which reserves a 16.66667 percent royalty to the State of Alaska. The seven-year primary lease term of these leases expires on April 30, 2011. The remaining two leases in the proposed unit area were offered in State of Alaska Lease Sale 87, held on June 24, 1998. DNR issued oil and gas leases ADL 389096 (Tract 4) and ADL 389097 (Tract 3), effective November 1, 1998, on State of Alaska lease form number DOG 9609 (rev. 6/97), which reserves a 12.50 percent royalty to the State of Alaska. The seven-year primary lease term of these leases expires on October 31, 2005.
Introduction and Background. 1.1 This policy aims to ensure that UK Biobank’s decision-making processes for access to the UK Biobank Resource are conducted in accordance with the highest standards of integrity. The key principle guiding access is the promotion of high quality health research for the public benefit.
Introduction and Background. Outlines the purpose, structure and stages in the preparation of the DA and considers the form and content of the RLDP; matters which will inform the development of the RLDP; opportunities for collaborative working; Plan Examination; and preparation of Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Introduction and Background. Rwanda Internet Community and Technology Alliance (RICTA) is the delegated authority for registering domain names in the .RW domains. The domain name space is served on a first in first out basis. RICTA has a rather liberal policy about domain name. RICTA does its best to ensure that the top-level domain is run for the best interest of the country. RICTA will use the registry – registrar model. DEFINITIONS & TERMS
Introduction and Background. 2.1.1 The purpose of this Section 2 is to set out the scope of the Services that the Agency is required to provide to CCS under this Framework Agreement and to provide a description of what the Services entail, together with any specific standards applicable to the Services.
Introduction and Background. The City of Cape Town provides a range of public services that broadly require the use of a private mobile data network service (APN), together with related mobile data services and ancillary mobile devices. This includes: • A Private Mobile Data Network service (sometimes referred to as an “APN”) • Mobile Internet ServicesSMS Services • Mobile Data Routers and ancillary hardware devices to enhance the signal strength of mobile data networks The city wishes to appoint a service provider/s from which the city can procure these services from as and when needed. The selected service provider(s) must: • Have the technical capability to offer such a service • Provide a service that meets the City’s requirements • Provide a service that meets the City’s’ contractual, technical and operating requirements.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.