International Reviews Sample Clauses

International Reviews. The Secretariat will present the 7th Edition of the Conservation Status Report (Doc AEWA/StC 13.14). The meeting will be invited to comment and to provide guidance as appropriate.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
International Reviews. The representative of Wetlands International will present the 6th Edition of the Conservation Status Report (Doc. AEWA/MOP 6.14), the update on the report on the Status of Introduced Non-native Waterbird Species and Hybrids (Doc. AEWA/MOP 6.15) and the report of the Status of Preparation and Implementation of
Sample 1
International Reviews. The representative of Wetlands International will present the 7th Edition of the Conservation Status Report (Doc. AEWA/MOP 7.14 Corr.1). Adoption of the AEWA Strategic Plan 2019-2027 The Secretariat will present the draft AEWA Strategic Plan 2019-2027 (Doc. AEWA/MOP 7.15) and the draft format for National reports on the implementation of AEWA 2018-2020 (Doc. AEWA/MOP 7.17). The Meeting will be invited to comment and to review pro parte and adopt the draft resolution on Adoption and Implementation of the AEWA Strategic Plan and the Plan of Action for Africa for the Period 2019-2027 (AEWA/MOP7 DR1). Adoption of the AEWA Plan of Action for Africa 2019-2027 The Secretariat will present the draft AEWA Plan of Action for Africa 2019-2027 (Doc. AEWA/MOP 7.16). The Meeting will be invited to comment and to review pro parte and adopt the draft resolution on Adoption and Implementation of the AEWA Strategic Plan and the Plan of Action for Africa for the Period 2019-2027 (AEWA/MOP7 DR1). Implementation Review Process
Sample 1
International Reviews. The Secretariat will present the 6th Edition of the Conservation Status Report (Doc StC 10.9) and will also report on the progress of the development of two further reports: the Status of Introduced Non-native Waterbird Species and Hybrids and the Stage of Preparation and Implementation of Single Species Action Plans.
Sample 1
International Reviews. 115. As lead compiler, Xx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx presented document AEWA/StC 13.14 The 7th Edition of the Conservation Status Report (CSR7), which was the only mandatory review produced this triennium, due to lack of funds.
Sample 1
International Reviews. 3.1. To continue to develop the “Report on the Site Network for waterbirds in the Agreement area”7 so as to better reflect information on the management and conservation status of key sites, to further develop ways of summarising this information accessibly (Resolution 5.2) while taking into account reporting needs on the AEWA Strategic Plan and assessment against relevant Aichi targets (Resolution 5.23) No funding to allow further work on this topic. Highlighted as priority for next triennium. Links also to Task 2.1.
Sample 1
International Reviews. The chief compiler of the 5th edition of the Conservation Status Report (Doc. AEWA/MOP 5.14) and the preliminary 1st edition of the Site Network Report (Doc. AEWA/MOP 5.15) will present the conclusions of both papers and the Secretariat will introduce draft resolution AEWA/MOP5 DR2. The meeting will be invited to consider these reports and adopt the draft resolution.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
International Reviews. The Secretariat will introduce the different International Reviews that have been prepared in accordance with paragraph 7.4
Sample 1

Related to International Reviews

  • Annual Reviews The Recipient shall:

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • External Review In the event of a final internal Adverse Benefit Determination, a Claimant may be entitled to an external review of the Claim. This request must be submitted in writing on an External Review Request form within 120 days of receipt of the Adverse Benefit Determination. The external reviewer will render a recommendation within 45 calendar days unless the request meets expedited criteria, in which case it will be resolved in no later than 72 hours. The external reviewer’s recommendation will be binding. The external reviewer will notify the Claimant of its decision in writing, and the Plan will take action as appropriate to comply with such recommendation. For detailed information about the external review process, please contact XxXxx’s Member Engagement Center.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Informal Review Step 1. As soon as practicable, the employee may discuss the grievance with his/her immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s). All parties may informally attempt a resolution of the matter before a formal grievance is filed. Informal resolutions, although final, shall not be precedent setting. If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussion with the immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s), the employee may file a formal grievance as set forth below.

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Initial Review The Union may present a written grievance to the DOC Headquarters Labor Relations Office via electronic mail within the twenty-one (21) day period described above. The Agency Head or designee will meet or confer by telephone or electronic conferencing with a Business Representative and/or Shop Xxxxxxx and the grievant within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the grievance, and will respond in writing to the Union within twenty-one (21) days after the meeting.

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.