Interagency Agreements e. Expired contracts subject to the exception at Section G of this memorandum.
Interagency Agreements. 1.1 Both Parties will endeavour to provide opportunities for the other Party to provide input to or involvement in interagency initiatives with other organizations that impact the activities of the other Party within the local trust area/electoral area.
Interagency Agreements. The Army and EPA are encouraged to enter into interagency agreements with other federal, state, tribal and local agencies which will provide assistance to the Corps and EPA in pursuit of Section 404 enforcement activities. For example, the preliminary enforcement site investigations or post-case monitoring activities required to ensure compliance with any enforcement order can be delegated to third parties (e.g., FWS) who agree to assist Corps/EPA in compliance efforts. However, only the Corps or EPA may make a violation determination and/or pursue an appropriate enforcement response based upon information received from a third party.
Interagency Agreements. The World Health Organization agrees to inform the Council of any for- mal agreement between the Organization and any other specialized agency, intergovernmental organization or non-governmental organization and in particular agrees to inform the Council of the nature and scope of any such agreement before it is concluded.
Interagency Agreements. Federal facilities on the National Priorities List (NPL) are required to enter into an interagency agreement (IAG) or a federal facility agreement (FFA) within 180 days of completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS), per the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act provisions codified as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §120(e)(2). The IAG outlines the responsibilities of the Military Component(s), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and, frequently, the state in the cleanup process. It allows EPA and states to assume regulatory oversight over environmental restoration activities at DoD installations. CERCLA §120(e)(5) requires that the number of IAGs and FFAs signed and in negotiation, the costs associated with IAGs, public comments, and IAG and FFA developments within the previous fiscal year be reported in the DERP Annual Report to Congress. The information provided in this appendix is for Fiscal Year 2001 (FY01). The three IAGs signed in FY01 (Table D-1) bring the total number of DoD IAGs to 117. Table D-2 lists all installations that conducted negotiations or Table D-1 TOC IAG/FFA Status Summary Component IAGs/FFAs Signed in FY01 IAGs/FFAs in Negotiation in FY01 Navy 3 5 Air Force 0 5 Total 3 14 signed IAGs or FFAs in FY01 and provides additional information on IAGs and FFAs that are under negotiation or were not concluded within the required time frame. Other information that must be reported according to CERCLA §120(e)(5) is provided as follows Cost estimates and budgetary proposals for IAGs: Table B-1 provides (1) information on environmental restoration costs that each DoD installation has incurred through FY01 and (2) estimates of each installation’s costs from FY02 through completion. Public comments regarding proposed IAGs: The public did not submit comments on IAGs to DoD during FY01. Installation Name IAG/FFA Status (signed or negotiated) Description of Cases in Which Negotiations Are Under Way or No Agreement Was Reached Within 180 days of Completion of the RI/FS ARMY Fort Eustis Negotiations ongoing The RI/FS is not complete, and a Record of Decision (ROD) has not been prepared. FFA negotiations between Army and EPA are considered ongoing until the FS is complete. Fort Xxxxx Negotiations ongoing A portion of Fort Xxxxx (Xxxxxx Army Airfield) was deleted from the NPL. The Fort Xxxxx partnering team is working on a site management plan as well as a draft...
Interagency Agreements. Federal facilities are required to enter into an interagency agreement (IAG) or a federal facility agreement (FFA) within 180 days of completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) at a National Priorities List (NPL) installation, per the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act provisions codified as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §120(e)(2). The IAG outlines the responsibilities of the Military Component(s), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and frequently, the state in the cleanup process. The IAG allows EPA and states to assume regulatory oversight over environmental restoration activities at DoD installations. CERCLA §120(e)(5) requires that (1) the number of IAGs and FFAs signed and in negotiation; (2) the costs associated with IAGs; (3) public comments; and (4) IAG and FFA developments within the previous fiscal year be reported in the Annual Report to Congress. The information provided in this appendix is for Fiscal Year 2000 (FY00). The three IAGs signed in FY00 (Table C-1) bring the total number of DoD IAGs to 114. Table C-2 lists all installations that conducted negotiations or signed IAGs or FFAs in FY00. Other information required to be reported by CERCLA §120(e)(5) is provided as follows: Cost estimates and budgetary proposals for IAGs: Table B-1 provides
Interagency Agreements. A) A State agency shall use the Uniform Intergovernmental Grant Agreement (UIGA) as the legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the State grantmaking agency and the awardee when:
Interagency Agreements. Urbana- Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, FACTS/ LRE. Kansas Department of Health and Environment. (1994). Procedure manual for infant/ toddler services in Kansas. Topeka: Author. Kansas Inservice Training System. (1993). Technical assistance packet: Transi- tions from Part H to Part X. Xxxxxxx, KS: Kansas University Affiliated Program. Xxxxxxxx, X. X., Xxxxx, X., & Xxxxxx, S. (1995). Interagency agreement for col- laborative preschool services for children with disabilities: What you may want to consider . Xxxxxxx, KS: Kansas University Affiliated Program. Xxxxxxxx, X. X., Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxx, N. & Xxxx, X. X. (1991). Rapid transits: Moving from preschool to kindergarten-transition planning for children with disabilities. Parsons, KS: Kansas University Affiliated Program, Rural Alternatives for Preschool Integrated Delivery of Services. Missouri Linc. (1990). Cooperative interagency agreements. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. Region VII Resource Access Project (1995). Developing an agreement with your local education agency. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas Medical Center. Books: Xxxxxxx, X. X., & Xxxxx, G. B. (1993). Deciphering the System: A Guide for Fami- lies. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. Xxxxxxxxxxxx, X. X., Xxxxx, X. X., & Xxxxxx, X. X. (1994). Bridging early services for children with special needs and their families: A practical guide for transition planning. Baltimore: Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx. SELECTING A PRESCHOOL OR CHILD CARE FOR YOUR CHILD Name of Program: Teacher: Phone Number:
Interagency Agreements. To participate in latecomers’ agreements, it may be appropriate to develop interlocal agreements between the County and special districts or Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Utilities may require inclusion in both County roads and State highways. Interlocal Agreements Some municipalities and districts develop cooperative service agreements under Chapter 39.34 RCW Interlocal Cooperation Act allowing extension of infrastructure or joint purchasing efforts. These may be helpful tools in achieving goals of investing in utilities in conjunction with other service providers. Xxxxxxxx County developed an interlocal agreement in 2012 under Chapter 39.34 RCW with the City of Lacey for an area in its urban growth area and outside of the County’s three sewer service areas. The Washington State Department of Ecology provided a loan to Xxxxxxxx County for a septic tank effluent public sanitary system (Woodland Creek Sewer); for 20 years until the loan is retired, the system will be owned by the County, but will discharge to the City of Lacey’s existing collection and conveyance system. The City will provide maintenance and operation of the sewer and charge a monthly service. Two subdivisions will connect to it. The County will transfer ownership to the City after 20 years when the loan terms are complete. This interlocal agreement is an example of a county funding improvements in an unincorporated urban growth area together with another municipality. Xxxxxxxx County secured funding and the designated provider of services, Lacey, is maintaining and operating the system. State Highways and Utilities The latecomers’ agreement statutes allow WSDOT to participate in the extension of roads in relation to state highway, including being the sole participant, like counties or cities. However, the county or city acts as the agent administering the chapter on WSDOT’s behalf.
Interagency Agreements. By October 1, 1987, the commissioner and the commissioner of human services shall enter into a written contract for the design, delivery, and administration of employment and training services for applicants for or recipients of food stamps, the Minnesota family investment program, and general assistance. The contract must address:
