Implementation Review Sample Clauses

Implementation Review. The School Board, the County and the City shall conduct workshops, at least annually, to discuss the implementation of this Agreement. The implementation review workshops shall be open to the public and provide for public comment on the implementation of this Agreement. The implementation review workshops may be either separate workshops conducted by the separate parties to this Agreement, or joint workshops providing for the participation of more than one party to this Agreement. In any event, each of the parties to this Agreement shall be required to participate in at least one implementation review workshop annually. The SWG shall prepare the agendas for the implementation review workshops, which shall include a report on the activities involved in the implementation of the Agreement since the execution of this Agreement, or since the last implementation review workshop, whichever is applicable.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Implementation Review. Within 18 months of the Registration Date, the Parties will conduct a review of the implementation of the agreements comprising the Settlement Package for the purpose of identifying any matters which remain to be completed for the relevant period and use reasonable endeavours to complete the outstanding items set out in the plan.
Sample 1
Implementation Review. The EMSU staff will conduct a review of the Company’s progress regarding the implementation of the two recommendations made in this report. Staff Participant Affidavits Xxxxx X. Xxxxx – Water & Sewer Department Xxxxxx X. XxXxxxxx-Auditing Department
Sample 1Sample 2
Implementation Review. The EMSU staff will conduct a review of the Com pany’s progress regarding the implementation of the two recommendations made in this report. Agreement Attachment H Water & Sewer Unit Memorandum
Sample 1
Implementation Review. The EMSU staff will conduct a review of the Company’s progress regarding the implementation of the recommendation made in this report. Agreement Attachment J Summary of Case Events Raytown Water Compamy Case #WR-2012-0405 Summary of Case Events Date Filed June 4, 2012 Day 150 November 1, 2012 Extension? No If yes, why? N/A Amount Requested $426,951 Amount Agreed Upon $390,268 Item(s)/Dollar(s) Driving Rate Increase Increase in cost of water purchased from the City of Kansas City Number of Customers 6,508 Return on Equity 8.25% Assessments Current Yes Annual Reports Filed Yes Statement of Revenue Filed Yes Other Open Cases before Commission None Status with Secretary of State Current DNR Violations None Significant Service/Quality Issues None Staff Participant Affidavits Xxxxx X. Xxxxx – Water & Sewer Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx – Water & Sewer Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx-Auditing Department
Sample 1
Implementation Review. The CMAU staff will conduct a review of the Company’s progress regarding the implementation of the one recommendation made in this report. Disposition Agreement Attachment D Water and Sewer Department Report Background‌ REPORT OF WATER AND SEWER UNIT FIELD OPERATIONS AND TARIFF REVIEW Raccoon Creek Utility Operating Company, Inc. Case No. SR-2016-0202 Xxx Xxxxxx / Xxxxx Xxxxxx / Xxxx Xxxxxxx Raccoon Creek Utility Operating Company, Inc. (Company) received its certificate of convenience and necessity from the Missouri Public Service Commission (Commission) November 24, 2014 in case number SM-2015-0014. This Company was formed by purchasing Village Water and Sewer Company, Inc. (near Xxxxxxxx Air Force Base in Knob Noster in Xxxxxxx County); W.P.C. Sewer Company; and West 16th Street Sewer Company, Inc. (in Sedalia in Xxxxxx County). These three systems collectively provide service to approximately 500 sewer customers. The Commission’s Water and Sewer Staff (Staff) performed an inspection on the sewer systems. Staff’s findings and recommendations for the Company are listed below.
Sample 1

Related to Implementation Review

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Implementation Program 1. The Borrower shall:

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, each Provider shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include:

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.