IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. 1. The Agency Official shall define and document the Area of Potential Effects (APE) and identify historic properties within the APE that may be directly or indirectly affected by the project. For purposes of this Agreement, when an Undertaking consists solely of the rehabilitation of the interior features of an individual building, the APE will be limited to the individual building and parcel.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. 1. Determine and Document the Area of Potential Effects A PQI will determine for each undertaking the Area of Potential Effects (APE), in consultation with the SHPO and any other consulting parties in accordance with 36 CFR 800.4. The PQI is responsible for conducting the consultation.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. The type of undertaking, Area of Potential Effects (APE) (36 CFR 800.16[d]), and existing information help determine identification needs for undertakings considered under this PA. Undertakings are processed to determine whether: (1) they fall into one of the streamlined procedure categories (i.e., Exemptions or Screened Undertakings); (2) existing information is sufficient for identification needs; or (3) a field survey or other information is needed to identify historic properties that may be affected. If an undertaking is Exempt (see below) under the provisions of this PA, it can proceed without further consideration under this PA or 36 CFR 800. If it is a Screened Undertaking, the HPM/DHPS /determines whether the streamlined procedures should be applied based on known information or whether it should be treated as a regular undertaking. All other undertakings require more comprehensive identification efforts to determine whether historic properties are present and could be affected. With the exception of Exemptions, all categories of undertakings are documented as specified in this PA.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. A. Area of Potential Effects The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for each undertaking will be determined by the Authority in accordance with the APE Delineation guidelines (Attachment B). As described in Attachment B, throughout the design process, the Authority will determine if revisions to an undertaking require modifications to the APE. If an APE requires revisions, the Authority is responsible for informing the signatories, consulting Federally-recognized Native American tribes, and other consulting parties within 15 days of identification of the needed changes.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. A. In planning for the Undertaking, DoD has conducted extensive surveys and evaluations, and, in consultation with the Guam and CNMI SHPO, ACHP, NPS, Consulting Parties, applied the results to the siting/lay down of individual projects to best avoid effects to historic properties. DoD has provided documentation of these efforts to the Signatories and Invited Signatories. Appendix D provides an overview of completed surveys, areas of known sensitivity, and identified historic properties.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. A. The City shall review all existing information on any property within an Undertaking’s APE, as required by 36 C.F.R. 800.4, to determine if such properties may be Historic Properties. At a minimum the City shall:
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. To meet Federal responsibilities under Section 110 of the NHPA, the park conducted a comprehensive Historic Resource Study (2007) to identify historic contexts and determine the NRHP eligibility of above-ground cultural resources. A list of resources which received SHPO concurrence is included in Appendix B in addition to a comprehensive list (as of 2022) of cultural resource baseline documentation. The Park has conducted some archeological surveys, but much of the APE is not surveyed. All ground-disturbing activities noted in the Comprehensive Trails Management Plan in areas not yet surveyed will be preceded by archaeological survey and testing in accordance with NPS-28 Cultural Resource Management Guidelines. CRNRA shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic properties, including those of cultural and religious significance, located within the APE for each undertaking implemented under the trails management plan. CRNRA shall ensure that all work is conducted under the supervision of a cultural resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications for the applicable discipline per Section 112(a)(1)(A) of the NHPA and at 36 CFR Part 800.2(a)(1) or be reviewed by Federal employees identified as a subject-matter experts (meeting the qualifications for the applicable discipline) as defined in Appendix E of NPS-28: Cultural Resource Management Guideline. Any undertaking that is determined to have no historic properties affected will be included in an annual report to the Consulting Parties and no additional requirements for Section 106 compliance will be needed.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. SHPO will review the agency’s submittal information on historic properties, as well as the efforts made to collect that information. SHPO may recommend additional efforts to locate historic properties in the area. For example, if an agency’s plans call for development of previously undeveloped property, and the area in question has not been systematically surveyed, the SHPO may recommend that a survey be conducted. [Note: recommended efforts to identify historic properties that may be affected by agency actions are discussed under A.R.S. §41-862 above.] If a historic property is identified by the agency, SHPO will also review the agency’s assessment of the property’s eligibility for inclusion on the Arizona Register. If the agency and the SHPO agree that the property is not eligible, then it need not be considered in agency planning. If the agency and the SHPO agree that the property is eligible, the effect of agency actions on that property must be considered. If the agency and the SHPO disagree on the eligibility determination, the final authority regarding determinations of eligibility rests with the SHPO. If time permits, and the agency agrees, the SHPO may seek the advice of the Historic Sites Review Committee; as provided in Arizona Administrative Code R12-8-206, the SHPO is the keeper of the Arizona Register and is responsible for determining whether or not a property is eligible for listing.
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. If an undertaking does not meet the criteria of Appendix B or Appendix C, ARDOT Qualified Staff will employ a multi-disciplinary approach to meet the requirements of 36 CFR 800.3 and 36 CFR 800.4. ARDOT Qualified Staff will follow the internal procedures process as outlined in Appendix D.V and may address multiple steps simultaneously. Draft November 2020 A. ARDOT shall identify historic properties that may be located within the APE. ARDOT shall determine the appropriate scope and type of identification efforts based on the magnitude of the project, the nature and extent of its potential effects on historic properties, and the likely nature of historic properties within the APE. ARDOT shall consult formally or informally with SHPO to determine the level of effort to identify historic properties and associated survey methodology. ARDOT will undertake the Initiation of the Section 106 Process and the Identification of Historic Properties by carrying out the following steps in conformance with the process outlined in the regulations implementing Section 106:
IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. A. The CITY will make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic properties located within the Area of Potential Effect per 36 CFR § 800.4.
