Historic Properties. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470, et seq.), particularly sections 106 and 110 (16 U.S.C. §§ 470 and 470h-2), except as provided in §58.17 for Section 17 projects; Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment, May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921), 3 C.F.R., 1971-1975 Comp., p. 559, particularly section 2(c); Federal historic preservation regulations as follows: 36 C.F.R. Part 800 with respect to HUD programs; and The Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960, as amended by the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469, et seq.), particularly section 3 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1).
Historic Properties. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470, et seq.), particularly sections 106 and 110 (16 U.S.C. §§ 470 and 470h-2), except as provided in §58.17 for Section 17 projects; Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment, May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921), 3 C.F.R., 1971-1975 Comp., p. 559, particularly section 2(c); Federal historic preservation regulations as follows: 36 C.F.R. Part 800 with respect to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) programs; and The Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960, as amended by the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469, et seq.), particularly section 3 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1).
Historic Properties. Properties (cultural resources) that are included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the NRHP maintained by the Secretary of the Interior and per the NRHP eligibility criteria at 36 C.F.R. § 60.4 and may include any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, traditional cultural property or object. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that meet the NRHP criteria. The term “eligible for inclusion on the NRHP” refers both to properties formally determined as such in accordance with regulations of the Secretary of the Interior and all other properties that meet the NRHP criteria.
Historic Properties. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and its implementing regulations (36 CFR Part 800) requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. This includes projects that use FHWA funds and actions that require FHWA approval. A Section 106 Programmatic Agreement (PA) (May 2018) was signed by FHWA, CTDOT-OEP, SHPO, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) that allows qualified OEP staff to make determinations on minor transportation projects that are listed in the Section 106 PA. OEP staff will review the project under Section 106 as part of the Environmental Review process. However, more detail may be needed by OEP after the Environmental Review process to make a final determination. If the project does not fall within the minor transportation projects listed in the Section 106 PA, as determined by the OEP staff, then OEP will consult with SHPO. SHPO will recommend a determination of effect to FHWA, which will usually be one of the following: “No Historic Properties Affected”, “No Adverse Effect”, or “Adverse Effect”. A copy of OEP’s finding or SHPO’s recommendation must be included with the CE Determination Checklist for ALL projects and must be received prior to signature of a Categorical Exclusion. For a project involving any historic bridge(s) which requires a Bridge Permit from the US Coast Guard, copy USCG on all correspondence to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and consulting parties. Adverse Effect Determinations - If the project results in an “Adverse Effect” under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), prepared by CTDOT, must be prepared to indicate what will be done to mitigate the project’s adverse effects on historic properties. If a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the resolution of adverse impacts is developed for a bridge requiring a permit from USCG, provide a draft copy of the MOA to USCG for review and provide a final copy of the MOA to USCG for their records. An Individual CE is required if the project includes Adverse Effects that cannot be resolved via an agreeable MOA under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; or if the project proposes an adverse effect on a National Historic Landmark. Please note that if the project requires an MOA, it must be signed by all parties prior to completion of a Categorical Exclusion. Tribal Coordination Requirements - FHWA must cond...
Historic Properties. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470, et seq.), particularly sections 106 and 110 (16 U.S.C. §§ 470 and 470h-2), except as provided in §58.17 DocuSign Envelope ID: 3D41A41B-FF47-4D67-9005-F69495B5A611 for Section 17 projects; Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment, May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921), 3 C.F.R., 1971-1975 Comp., p. 559, particularly section 2(c); Federal historic preservation regulations as follows: 36 C.F.R. Part 800 with respect to HUD programs; and The Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960, as amended by the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469, et seq.), particularly section 3 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1).
Historic Properties. Specification of all historic properties to be affected by the project, including a description of the nature of the effects.
Historic Properties. If historic properties become subject to alterations to which this part ap- plies the requirements of § 4.1.7 of the standards of § 8.32 of this part shall apply, except in the case of the Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) program. In the UDAG program the re- quirements of 36 CFR part 801 shall apply. Accessibility to historic prop- erties subject to alterations need not be provided if such accessibility would substantially impair the significant historic features of the property or re- xxxx in undue financial and administra- tive burdens.
Historic Properties. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of historic properties during construction activities, the IDOT shall halt construction, secure the area, and consult with the FRA, SHPO and ACHP for the purposes of Section 106 pursuant to 36 CFR§ 800.13(b).
Historic Properties. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. § 470, et seq.), particularly sections 106 and 110 (16 U.S.C. §§ 470 and 470h-2), except as provided in §58.17 for Section 17 projects; Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment, May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921), 3 C.F.R., 1971-1975 Comp., p. 559, particularly section 2(c); Federal historic preservation regulations as follows: 36 C.F.R. Part 800 with respect to HUD programs; and The Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960, as amended by the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469, et seq.), particularly section 3 (16 U.S.C. § 469a-1). DocuSign Envelope ID: E27BB58C-74AF-47AF-BA25-4C4792676C6A ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND AUTHORITIES Environmental Review Procedures for Recipients assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities (24 C.F.R. Part 58, as amended); National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347); and Council for Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing NEPA (40 C.F.R. Parts 1500- 1508).
Historic Properties. The BLM-Arizona shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify cultural resources located within the APEs for each Undertaking in accordance with 36 CFR 800.4(a)(2-4) and 36 CFR 800.4(b). The Agency Official will initiate primary historic properties identification at the beginning of the planning process for TMPs. At the beginning of the planning process, BLM-Arizona will, at minimum, complete a comprehensive review and inventory of existing literature and data associated the direct and indirect APE for each Undertaking. The scale of this review should be commensurate with the size and nature of the Undertaking, but shall, at minimum, include a review of current professional literature, regional overviews, appropriate historic contexts, review of BLM Field Office and other institutional files, historic documents and maps, and GIS and other databases likely to contain cultural resource data. BLM-Arizona may use a variety of additional methods to refine their understanding of the existing information on the known historic properties within the APE and gather additional information on the probability, location, density, and nature of unidentified cultural resources. GIS-based Cultural Resources Sensitivity Map(s). BLM-Arizona may develop maps and datasets depicting the potential types, and densities of cultural resources throughout the APE(s). The maps can be based on the information recovered during the existing literature and data review and/or incorporating predictive models using multi-variate analysis including data from such sources as: hydrology, landscape features, slope, aspect, elevation, elevation, ecology, pedology, geology, and elevation. Data collection via consultation. BLM-Arizona may seek additional communication with Tribes, local governments, public and private organizations, and other parties likely to be able to provide information on the locations of unrecorded or partially recorded cultural resource sites, traditional cultural properties, and places of religious significance or cultural value to Tribes. Data collection via consultation will be subject to the provisions of Stipulation X. Field Inspections/Site Visits. Field inspections may be used to investigate specific cultural resource locations and gather data regarding: existing condition of the resource, identify/document the effects of current use on the resource, or confirm existing information and site data. Reconnaissance or Judgmental Surveys. A focused or special-p...
