Historic Preservation Review. If the facility that is being renovated with state funds is fifty (50) years old or older, then in accordance with Sections 267.061(2)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes, the Grantee must submit information about the grant project to the Division of Historical Resources, Bureau of Historic Preservation (Bureau), so that it may determine whether the project has historic significance. Should the Bureau deem the facility to have historic significance, grant funds may only be released after the Bureau notifies the Division, in writing, that the Grantee has satisfied the Bureau's requirements. If the facility is not deemed to be of historic significance, grant funds will be released to Grantee in accordance with Section 4 of this Agreement.
Historic Preservation Review. The Grantee shall not commence construction nor allow commencement of construction until all Project plans have been approved by the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation. Grantee shall construct the Project in accordance with the approved project plans. Any conditions to avoid adverse impact on any historic or archeological resources shall be met, as set forth by letter to Grantee from the Division for Historic Preservation on behalf of the Vermont Advisory Council for Historic Preservation. Any changes to the Project plans must be approved in advance by the Division of Historic Preservation.
Historic Preservation Review. The City’s Office of Historic Preservation is charged with reviewing the design plans for all structure constructed or installed on City property. The design plans for all Network Huts and fencing surrounding such structures will be subject to the review of the Office of Historic Preservation in order to satisfy that the design is compatible with the historic designation of the zone or character of the neighborhood in which City Sites are located. The Tenant commits to implement design concepts, and the use of materials and camouflage, as necessary in order to achieve compliance with historic preservation review, including following the City of San Antonio Historic Design Guidelines. B Xxxxxxx Aquifer Recharge Zone. Tenant will be required to comply with all environmental protection measures associated with installations and construction of Network Huts at any City Sites located over the Xxxxxxx Aquifer Recharge Zone.
Historic Preservation Review. For each project being funded in whole or in part through a Grant Agreement, a historic preservation review must first be completed by the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) or MEA’s historic preservation expert. This review ensures that no historic property is “adversely affected” through building improvements, equipment installations, and related property modifications proposed for Projects funded wholly or in-part by a Program. Prior to starting construction, the Grantee shall ensure that MEA has received documentation from MHT or MEA’s historic preservation expert indicating that the Project will have no adverse effect on a historic property.
Historic Preservation Review. The Grantee must submit the confirmation received from the Bureau of Historic Preservation regarding the historical significance of the property. Applies if structures are 50 years or older. (See Section 22) f) Submit a copy of the Grantee’s Florida Substitute Form W-9. (See Section 7)
Historic Preservation Review. For each project being funded in whole or in part through this Agreement, a historic preservation review must first be completed by the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) or MEA’s historical preservation expert. This review ensures that no historical property is “adversely affected” through this Program. Prior to starting construction, College shall assure that MEA has received documentation from MHT or MEA’s historical preservation expert indicating that the Project will have no adverse effect on a historical property.
