GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES Sample Clauses

GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement precludes any Maa-nulth First Nation from participating in processes or institutions, including processes or institutions that may address matters of shared decision-making, or benefits from future provincial programs, policies or initiatives of general application to First Nations as British Columbia develops a new relationship with First Nations.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. 7.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement precludes Yale First Nation from participating in provincial processes or institutions, including processes or institutions that may address matters of shared decision-making and revenue and benefit sharing, or benefiting from future provincial programs, policies or initiatives of general application to First Nations, as British Columbia develops a new relationship with First Nations, including the enactment of legislation to support these initiatives.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. The Parties agree that State and Contractor management teams will utilize a governance model that implements oversight and review with a specified frequency, participants and subject matter. To that end, the Parties agree to adopt a model which includes the following elements:
Sample 1
GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. College and the District have governance committees. A CSEA member assigned to a committee may have up to 10% of his or her assigned work week hours used in release for governance committee service when the committees are meeting. There are four items of note:  The first is approval. The college, district or ATEP determines the shared governance activities for which release time can be appropriate, not the Classified Senate or CSEA. The institution decides what is appropriate. The CBA defines specific committee assignments in Article 3.2.1.2, which is shown below. The individual college, district or ATEP may create more opportunities for shared governance committees beyond what is defined within the CBA.  Second, there is a formal approval process in Article 3.1.12 which is listed below.  Third, there may be representational matters which involve wages, hours or working conditions. If so, CSEA has the right to appoint the member on the committee. The supervisor may review the appointment if necessary and contact the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources.  Fourth, the College President’s Councils listed below in Article 3.2.1.2 are currently named Consultation Council at Saddleback College and College Council at Irvine Valley College.
Sample 1
GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. The Parties agree that State and Contractor management teams will utilize a governance model that implements oversight and review with a specified frequency, participants and subject matter. To that end, the Parties agree to adopt a model which includes the following elements: Weekly Review: Contractor’s Operational Manager will review with State’s Authorized Representative or his/her designee, on a weekly basis (unless otherwise mutually agreed), daily dashboards, address exceptions and operational issues related to both State and Third Party Vendors of the State. Monthly Review: Contractor’s Operational Manager will, on a recurring monthly basis (unless otherwise mutually agreed), together with State’s Authorized Representative or his/her designee, and State’s Contract Manager, review: (1) Contractor’s Service Level Agreement compliance, (2) perform capacity planning and (3) recommend process improvement initiatives which shall be noted in the meeting minutes. Contractor will, on a recurring schedule, together with State’s Authorized Representative or his/her designee, and State’s Contract Manager, review service delivery quality, State and Contractor resourcing, escalations made since the prior weekly meeting, risks and issues identified since the prior meeting and any which continue to be open more than one week. Contractor will, on a recurring schedule, meet with State’s Project Manager to monitor during the ITSM transition period, all transition-related risks and issues. Quarterly Review: Contractor’s Executive Leadership will meet with State’s Executive Leadership on a quarterly basis (unless otherwise mutually agreed), to review overall contractual compliance and to create, review, or revise strategic plans or topics.
Sample 1
GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES. 3.1.1. The Provider and the Customer will operate under their established governance structures relative to their respective organisations.
Sample 1

Related to GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES

  • Governance (a) The HSP represents, warrants and covenants that it has established, and will maintain for the period during which this Agreement is in effect, policies and procedures:

  • Governance Structure The Academy shall be organized and administered as a Michigan nonprofit corporation under the direction of the Academy Board and pursuant to the governance structure as set forth in the Bylaws. The Academy’s Board of Directors shall meet monthly unless another schedule is mutually agreed upon by the President and the Academy. The Academy shall not delegate this duty of organization and administration of the Academy without the express affirmative consent of the University.

  • GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS Enforceability of the Agreement

  • Cease Activities Upon receiving a notice of termination of this Grant, Grantee must immediately cease all activities under this Grant, unless Agency expressly directs otherwise in such notice. Upon termination, Grantee must deliver to Agency all materials or other property that are or would be required to be provided to Agency under this Grant or that are needed to complete the Project activities that would have been performed by Grantee.

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

  • Outside Activities Subject to the Articles of Incorporation and any agreements entered into by the General Partner or its Affiliates with the Partnership or a Subsidiary, any officer, director, employee, agent, trustee, Affiliate or stockholder of the General Partner shall be entitled to and may have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to those relating to the Partnership, including business interests and activities substantially similar or identical to those of the Partnership. Neither the Partnership nor any of the Limited Partners shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement in any such business ventures, interest or activities. None of the Limited Partners nor any other Person shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement or the partnership relationship established hereby in any such business ventures, interests or activities, and the General Partner shall have no obligation pursuant to this Agreement to offer any interest in any such business ventures, interests and activities to the Partnership or any Limited Partner, even if such opportunity is of a character which, if presented to the Partnership or any Limited Partner, could be taken by such Person.

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • GOVERNANCE AND REPORTING Measure 3a Is the school complying with governance requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to governance by its board, including but not limited to: • Governing board composition and membership requirements pursuant to Ch. 302D, HRS • Governing board policies • Governing board reporting requirements • Procurement policies • State Ethics Code (Ch. 84, HRS), including conflict of interest policy Measure 3b Is the school holding management accountable? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to oversight of school management, including but not limited to: • (For Education Service Providers [ESPs]) maintaining authority over management, holding it accountable for performance as agreed under a written performance agreement and requiring annual financial reports of the ESP • (For Others) oversight of management that includes holding it accountable for performance expectations that may or may not be agreed to under a written performance agreement Measure 3c Is the school complying with data and reporting requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to relevant reporting requirements to the State Public Charter School Commission, State Department of Education as the State Education Agency (SEA) and sole Local Education Agency (LEA) and/or federal authorities, including but not limited to: • Compliance with minimum educational data reporting standards established by the BOE • Maintaining and reporting accurate enrollment and attendance data • Maintaining and reporting accurate personnel data • Annual reporting and immediate notice requirements • Additional information requested by the State Public Charter School Commission

  • Governance and Anticorruption 14. The Borrower, the Project Executing Agency, and the implementing agencies shall (a) comply with ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (1998, as amended to date) and acknowledge that ADB reserves the right to investigate directly, or through its agents, any alleged corrupt, fraudulent, collusive or coercive practice relating to the Project; and

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.