Further Research Clause Examples
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Further Research. (a) Investigators shall be free at any time to seek and accept funding for any research in the Field, from any state or federal agency, private or public foundation except foundations owned or operated by a commercial entity other than Palomar (“Non-Profit Sponsored Study”). In the event that during the term of this Agreement an Investigator makes an invention in the Field and in the performance of any Non-Profit Funded Study, General agrees to give Palomar prompt notice of said invention and to give Palomar an opportunity to negotiate an exclusive license under General’s rights in said invention assigned to General by an Investigator, it being understood that General shall have no obligation to enter into such a license with Palomar.
(b) In the event that an Investigator during the term of this Agreement or for six (6) months thereafter wishes to seek funding from any for profit entity for additional research in the Field (it being understood that for funding sought during the term of this Agreement or any extension hereof such additional research will be research other than that which is described in the study protocols appended hereto as Schedule A), said Investigator shall do so in accordance with this paragraph. The Investigator shall submit to Palomar a description of such additional research and a budget of the costs to be funded by Palomar and a schedule of payment of such costs. Unless the parties shall otherwise agree in writing, negotiations between them over any such proposal shall not extend beyond the sixtieth (60) day next following the date when the proposal shall have first been so made.
(c) Whenever such negotiations shall end without agreement between the parties to proceed with the proposed research, the party proposing the additional research may go ahead without the other party and seek funding from any other sponsor including but not limited to a commercial sponsor for such proposal, so long as the subject matter of the proposal is not so closely related scientifically to the Study that sponsorship of such proposal by such other commercial sponsor (i) would in the opinion of General’s Trustee’s Committee on Technology Affairs after consultation with Palomar create a conflict of interest for General or any Investigator performing the Study or (ii) would conflict with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. It is understood that, in the event that General proceeds to seek support from such other commercial sponsor, for a period of ...
Further Research. Several paths for potential future research were identified after the review of the available publishing data. Developing a study to examine the “why” of author uptake and the motivations behind authors’ choice of open access publication would allow us to better understand the demand and impact of this and other agreements. Specifically, a mixed methods study incorporating both quantitative analysis of author and publisher data alongside a qualitative component comprising focus groups and/or survey data would enrich and deepen our understanding. Further exploring author uptake and author choice by academic discipline would be very helpful, both as a contribution to the literature as well as for practical outreach and engagement at Ohio State. Given the publishing portfolio of Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, with wide and deep coverage in the humanities and social sciences, we could broaden our understanding of the impact of no-fee open access publishing on subject disciplines that tend not to have sizable grant funding. Interdisciplinarity is a focus of both Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx and Ohio State researchers, so further analysis of the author data to more fully understand disciplinary use would be an enlightening endeavor. With the addition of new agreements since first starting one with Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, analyzing this pilot agreement alongside other pilot or initial read and publish agreements could aid in understanding the impact of these kinds of open access agreements at scale. How are funds maximized over time? Can we determine any formulas or rubrics that can aid in both high-level and specific assessment of read and publish agreements? During our pilot implementation and analysis, our realization grew that author payment models can be an equity challenge, with effects beyond our institution. Importantly then, how can we address, measure, and reckon with the equity challenges of open access agreements that rely on author-side payment models, and their global effect?
Further Research. My measurement of compliance is not perfect and some political scientists have measured compliance in other ways. Xxxxxxxxx (2002 as cited in Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxx 2005) concluded that the Helsinki Protocol had caused compliance based on the significant policy changes in ratifying countries. So perhaps quantifying climate related policy changes would be a good measure of compliance. Another, perhaps more convincing, method comes from Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (1997 as cited in Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxx 2005) who used a spatial autoregressive model to determine that emission levels were indeed lower than what would have been expected if the Helsinki Protocol were absent. Helm and Sprinz (2000 as cited in Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxx 2005) also concluded the Helsinki Protocol to be effective. They went about this by reasoning from the counterfactual, as suggested by Xxxxxxx. First, they used experts to estimate levels of sulfur dioxide emission under complete compliance with the treaty and then under conditions of zero compliance with the treaty. They reasoned from the results that there was indeed a significant decrease in emissions due to the Helsinki Protocol. There are a few variables that I would have liked to have tested and could possibly improve my model the future. One such variable would be federalism. Countries with federalism spread the power of government over smaller decentralized units instead of a central authority. According to Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx this should make it more difficult to enact environmental rules because these smaller authorities are more limited in reach and power (Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx 1998). It is also possible that the smaller subregions have special interests that could be contrary to the country as a whole. For example, if one region was rich in coal and generated a lot of carbon emissions it is not difficult to conceive it not wanting to curb the use of this resource. And in a federalist system there might be a lack of adequate power to force that region to comply. Another variable also examined by Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx is how strict the punishments are for not following environmental laws. The US has some of the strictest laws of any of the countries I examined. Environmental violations in the US can result in not just fines but serious prison time. Fines can also be huge, for example Exxon was levied a 100 million dollar fine for the Exxon Xxxxxx spill and agreed in a civil settlement to pay 1.1 billion dollars to restore...
Further Research. Further research continues to develop the ESST account in Estonia. This involves improving the methodology to the potential automatization of certain parts of the ESST account. Cooperation with Statistics Netherlands is set to continue – especially on the topic of automatization and switching to R programming language. Some key points for moving forwards are listed below.
Further Research. ➢ Based on the experience of this study, a holistic study of regional air pollution could be conducted to cover the Greater Pearl River Delta area (including Hong Kong, Macao and the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone). Findings from this large scale regional study would provide technical supports for promoting and implementing the co-prevention and co-control of regional air pollution.
Further Research. Research should be conducted to determine the proportions of climax structure Xxxxxxx-fir stands, and xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx-fir stands (includes pine leading stands some of which may have old attributes) as a subset of xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx-fir stands. The Chilcotin variant of the IDF, the IDFdk4 is similar to the IDFdk3. It occurs exclusively on the west side of the Fraser River. Annual precipitation and annual temperature are slightly lower than the IDFdk3. Field observations indicate that the High pine stratum may be much more extensive in the IDFdk4 than it is in the IDFdk3. It is expected that historical fire regimes differ significantly from those found in the IDFdk3 (Xxxxxxx et al. 2002). The IDFxm exists below both the IDFdk3 and IDFdk4. It is assumed that it would most similar to the Xxxxxxx-fir Low stratum described by Xxxxxxx et al (2002).
Further Research. The data collected only identified whether or not a contract had the ‘intention’ of providing social value. This leaves potential for a qualitative line of research to determine whether those projects that had intended on providing social value did or failed in doing so.
Further Research. None. The following table and graph compares the age class distributions from the Biodiversity Guidebook 1995 125 year return cycles, with the upper (90) and lower (60) fire intervals as calculated/suggested by Xxxxxxx et al., 2002 (pg 117). Xxxxxxx et al. (2002) found very little evidence of a mixed severity fire regime in the East Fraser study area, so the estimated fire cycles provided can be directly compared to those proposed by the Biodiversity Guidebook (1995).
Further Research. Further analysis could also be done with this data to better understand latrine aspects that drive latrine use among men and among women, as drivers of use may vary by gender. Additionally, the level of statistical significance associated with partitioning could be changed to be less conservative. This would result in a much larger tree that may reveal more latrine factors and combinations that are associated with a latrine being in use though large trees become increasingly difficult to interpret. Other opportunities for further research include conducting qualitative or quantitative evaluations on the impact of lights inside of latrines and tiled floors on latrine use. These two improvements were notable in both the multivariate analysis and CIT though there is currently little published research regarding their effects on latrine use.
Further Research. This study is an early step in the application of putting human trafficking in a public health framework. It can be carried out by further researchers and used to determine future methods of implementing and evaluating human trafficking prevention strategies. As awareness of this issue grows across functions and specifically in the public health field, researchers will hopefully keep the priorities for public health research on human trafficking in mind and use previous research to adapt new and effective ways to implement and evaluate strategies.