Funding Allocation Sample Clauses

The Funding Allocation clause defines how financial resources are distributed among parties or project components under an agreement. Typically, it outlines the specific amounts or percentages assigned to each party, the schedule for disbursement, and any conditions that must be met before funds are released. By clearly specifying the allocation and timing of funds, this clause ensures transparency, prevents disputes over financial responsibilities, and facilitates smooth project execution.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Funding Allocation. This Agreement 🗷 includes 🞏 does not include Federal funds. Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Energy Federal Award Project Description: BIL: EECBG Program – State of Vermont Public Service Department Program Title(s) (if federal funding, use federal title): Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG) State Funds: $ 0.00 State Funding Agreement # (if applicable): 02240-FY25-EECBG-005 Other Funds: $ 0.00 Total Award: $ Title: Municipal Coordinator Title: Project Director Address (if other than in Part 1):
Funding Allocation. The Department will make available to Councils funding for the period (2016/17) in respect of implementation of the 2011 Act for non-farmed animals. The level of available funding for 2016/17 is currently £990K (however a business case was submitted by DAERA in June 2016 to bring total funding to
Funding Allocation. Within 60 days of the Effective Date, the Stewardship Council will pay County the sum of Two Hundred and Thirty Two Dollars ($232) (“Funding Allocation”), based upon the Payment Calculation in Exhibit B.
Funding Allocation. The City will reimburse Durham County DSS not more than a total of $74,000.00 in CDBG funds for comprehensive case management services and/or rental assistance (series of three subsistence payments) to a minimum of 35 households during the period of this contract on the following basis:  Case Manager to provide comprehensive case management services at a rate of $500.00 per household;  Reimbursement for rental assistance (series of three subsistence payments) provided to clients who are 80% AMI or below and on the verge of being evicted as specified in the budget and in the this Scope; At no time shall the City of Durham advance funds to Durham County DSS beyond the amount of money that has been spent on pre-approved eligible CDBG activities, and at no time will CDBG funds be paid unless Durham County DSS has “earned” that reimbursement by meeting their performance goal.
Funding Allocation. 4.1. This agreement sets the context in which PAVO is funded to carry out its work in and for the communities and organisations of Powys. In addition to the grant that invests in the core work of Powys, there exists a diversity of funded relationships based on grants, SLAs, contracts etc. These are the product of a constantly changing environment and a result of a dynamic partnership between PCC and PAVO. 4.2. Funding arrangements between PCC and PAVO will be reviewed annually to reflect the Council’s budget position alongside strategic priorities for the financial year to follow. 4.3. A current schedule of these funded relationships can be seen in Appendix 2.
Funding Allocation. The Contractor shall manage the Contract to ensure that services are provided in a manner that allocates the available resources over the life of the Contract.
Funding Allocation. 7.1 In consideration of the partial funding of the services shown above, THE COMMISSIONERS shall pay Successful Service Provider the sum of £XX per annum. The sum thus agreed (“the funding”) will be paid by way of quarterly payments in advance via cheque or BACS system. 7.2 The only adjustments that may be made to the amount given in 7.1 would be as a result of any agreements made between THE COMMISSIONERS and Successful Service Provider following any changes made because of an amendment to the specified service (set out in the attached Service Specification appendix) or changes to the funding available. 7.3 THE COMMISSIONERS funding shall be construed as being sufficient to fund those core services referred to in this agreement. 7.4 THE COMMISSIONERS may withdraw or reduce the funding at any time and for any reason and will follow the requirements of the Gloucestershire Compact which are mirrored in the procedures set out below (7.5-7.7) when making reductions of the allocated funding or withdrawal of the allocated funding. 7.5 THE COMMISSIONERS will give Successful Service Provider clear reasons for the withdrawal or reduction of the funding in writing. 7.6 Where the funding is reduced or withdrawn a minimum of six months written notice will be given by THE COMMISSIONERS to Successful Service Provider. Any costs incurred by Successful Service Provider as a result of the withdrawal or reduction of the payment are to be met from the final six-month payment. Typically, this would include the cost of reducing or winding up services, carrying out redundancies, meeting holiday entitlements of staff made redundant. 7.7 If Successful Service Provider should cease to operate or go into receivership or administration then subject to Charities and Insolvency Law and when other liabilities have been met, any outstanding balances from the funding is to be repaid. Any goods purchased with the funding should be returned to THE COMMISSIONERS. 7.8 All payments to be made under this agreement from THE COMMISSIONERS to Successful Service Provider are exclusive of VAT as the benefit is to a third party and not to THE COMMISSIONERS. 7.9 Where Successful Service Provider gains a surplus of income from grants, fundraising or other sources in any one year, THE COMMISSIONERS will not seek repayment of any part of the funding. Successful Service Provider will maintain a level of reserves appropriate to meet its financial responsibilities. 7.10 Successful Service Provider shall ac...
Funding Allocation. Initial funding for the Program population: is based upon the following allocation by County a. Los Angeles County: $250,000 b. Large: $150,000 c. Medium: $100,000 d. Small: $50,000
Funding Allocation. For every Percent for Art project, RACC will allocate funding consistent with PCC Chapter 5.74.
Funding Allocation. Each state with less than 10,000,000 megawatt-hours of annual load participating in the EIM will be designated as a small load state; all other states will be designated large load states. Each small load state will be allocated a funding amount equal to the total funding amount divided by the number of states represented on the BOSR multiplied by 50 percent. Each large load state will be allocated a funding amount equal to the remaining funding balance divided by the number of large load states. Each SRMP within a state will be allocated a funding amount by multiplying the state funding amount by the SRMPs percentage share of the total SRMP load in the state.