Fourth occurrence of same problem Sample Clauses

Fourth occurrence of same problem. As per above, except that a longer suspension or termination of employment may occur, depending on the circumstances and severity of the fourth occurrence. A Xxxxxxx must be present for a “fourth occurrence” meeting. LETTER OF AGREEMENT #1 Between LEHIGH XXXXXX MATERIALS LIMITED and CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, CLAC LOCAL 6
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Fourth occurrence of same problem. As per above, except that a longer suspension or termination of employment may occur, depending on the circumstances and severity of the fourth occurrence. A Xxxxxxx must be present for a “fourth occurrence” meeting. LETTER OF AGREEMENT #1 Between CAMBRIDGE CONCRETE and BRANTFORD READY MIX, DIVISIONS OF ESSROC CANADA INC. and CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, CLAC LOCAL 6
Sample 1
Fourth occurrence of same problem. As per above except that a longer suspension or termination of employment may occur, depending on the circumstances and severity of the fourth occurrence. A Xxxxxxx must be present for a “fourth occurrence” meeting. Between and LETTER OF AGREEMENT TRI CITY READY MIX LIMITED hereinafter referred to as "the Employer" CONSTRUCTION WORKERS LOCAL 6 affiliated with the CHRISTIAN LABOUR ASSOCIATION OF CANADA hereinafter referred to as "the Union" RE: HOURS OF WORK / SERVICE Whereas the Employer and the Union are bound by a Collective Agreement effective from May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2016 and any renewals thereof; And whereas the Employer and the Union wish to clarify certain matters and ensure compliance with Employment Standards Act, 2000, particularly as amended by Xxxx 63; Now therefore the Employer and the Union agree as follows:
Sample 1
Fourth occurrence of same problem. As per above, except that a longer suspension or termination of employment may occur, depending on the circumstances and severity of the fourth occurrence. A Xxxxxxx must be present for a “fourth occurrence” meeting. Between LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING #1 CAMBRIDGE CONCRETE and and BRANTFORD READY MIX, Divisions of Essroc Canada Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "the Employer") CHRISTIAN LABOUR ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (hereinafter referred to as "the Union") RE: REQUEST FOR WINTER LAYOFF If during winter months the Employer is unable to regularly provide an employee with at least twenty-five (25) hours of work per week, an employee may request to be laid off and the Employer, subject to legitimate business requirements, shall honour this request. The Employer shall not exercise such discretion unreasonably. This letter shall be in effect for one (1) year after the date on which it is signed, and may be renewed annually thereafter by agreement of the parties. Between LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING #2 CAMBRIDGE CONCRETE and BRANTFORD READY MIX, and Divisions of Essroc Canada Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "the Employer") CHRISTIAN LABOUR ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (hereinafter referred to as "the Union") RE: CENTRAL DISPATCH The parties commit to meet regularly at the Employer’s dispatch operations centre in order to promote constructive dialogue between them on how best to achieve effective and efficient product delivery, and customer satisfaction, while also balancing the economic interests and job security of the employees assigned to the various plants. At such meetings, the Union may advance suggestions, concerns, or queries in respect of the Employer’s dispatch protocol. To facilitate these discussions, employees with complaints or concerns about particular decisions or practices of the dispatchers shall submit such concerns on a form to be provided by the Employer, and shall do so at, or around the time at which the instance giving rise to their concern occurs. A copy of this form will be forwarded to the Employer and to a Union xxxxxxx at the plant where the employee works. Such forms will be referred to the next quarterly meeting of the parties. Unless the parties agree otherwise, such meetings shall take place on the second Friday in March, June, September, and December. The Union shall be represented at such meetings by one (1) xxxxxxx from each plant and one (1) representative of the CLAC. The stewards shall be paid for the time spent at such meetings. The Employ...
Sample 1

Related to Fourth occurrence of same problem

  • Name Collision Occurrence Assessment 6.2.1 Registry Operator shall not activate any names in the DNS zone for the Registry TLD except in compliance with a Name Collision Occurrence Assessment provided by ICANN regarding the Registry TLD. Registry Operator will either (A) implement the mitigation measures described in its Name Collision Occurrence Assessment before activating any second-­‐level domain name, or (B) block those second-­‐level domain names for which the mitigation measures as described in the Name Collision Occurrence Assessment have not been implemented and proceed with activating names that are not listed in the Assessment.

  • Name Collision Occurrence Management 6.1. No-­‐Activation Period. Registry Operator shall not activate any names in the DNS zone for the Registry TLD (except for "NIC") until at least 120 calendar days after the effective date of this agreement. Registry Operator may allocate names (subject to subsection 6.2 below) during this period only if Registry Operator causes registrants to be clearly informed of the inability to activate names until the No-­‐Activation Period ends.

  • Reports of unusual occurrence The Contractor shall, during the Maintenance Period, prior to the close of each day, send to the Authority and the Authority’s Engineer, by facsimile or e- mail, a report stating accidents and unusual occurrences on the Project Highway relating to the safety and security of the Users and Project Highway. A monthly summary of such reports shall also be sent within 3 (three) business days of the closing of month. For the purposes of this Clause 15.4, accidents and unusual occurrences on the Project Highway shall include:

  • Commercial General Liability – Occurrence Form Policy shall include bodily injury, property damage, personal injury and broad form contractual liability. • General Aggregate $2,000,000 • Products – Completed Operations Aggregate $1,000,000 • Personal and Advertising Injury $1,000,000 • Blanket Contractual Liability – Written and Oral $1,000,000 • Fire Legal Liability $50,000 • Each Occurrence $1,000,000

  • The OCN, From XXX, and Invoice Number will control the invoice sequencing The From XXX will be used to identify to <<customer_name>> which BellSouth XXX is sending the message. BellSouth and <<customer_name>> will use the invoice sequencing to control data exchange. BellSouth will be notified of sequence failures identified by <<customer_name>> and resend the data as appropriate. THE DATA WILL BE PACKED USING ATIS EMI RECORDS.

  • What if a Prohibited Transaction Occurs If a “prohibited transaction”, as defined in Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, occurs, the Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account could be disqualified. Rules similar to those that apply to Traditional IRAs will apply.

  • Status Substantial Compliance Analysis The Compliance Officer found that PPB is in substantial compliance with Paragraph 80. See Sections IV and VII Report, p. 17. COCL carefully outlines the steps PPB has taken—and we, too, have observed—to do so. Id. We agree with the Compliance Officer’s assessment. In 2018, the Training Division provided an extensive, separate analysis of data concerning ECIT training. See Evaluation Report: 2018 Enhanced Crisis Intervention Training, Training usefulness, on-the-job applications, and reinforcing training objectives, February 2019. The Training Division assessed survey data showing broad officer support for the 2018 ECIT training. The survey data also showed a dramatic increase in the proportion of officers who strongly agree that their supervisors are very supportive of the ECIT program, reaching 64.3% in 2018, compared to only 14.3% in 2015: The Training Division analyzed the survey results of the police vehicle operator training and supervisory in-service training, as well. These analyses were helpful in understanding attendees’ impressions of training and its application to their jobs, though the analyses did not reach as far as the ECIT’s analysis of post-training on- the-job assessment. In all three training analyses, Training Division applied a feedback model to shape future training. This feedback loop was the intended purpose of Paragraph 80. PPB’s utilization of feedback shows PPB’s internalization of the remedy. We reviewed surveys of Advanced Academy attendees, as well. Attendees were overwhelmingly positive in response to the content of most classes. Though most respondents agreed on the positive aspects of keeping the selected course in the curriculum, a handful of attendees chose options like “redundant” and “slightly disagree,” indicating that the survey tools could be used for critical assessment and not merely PPB self-validation. We directly observed PPB training and evaluations since our last report. PPB provided training materials to the Compliance Officer and DOJ in advance of training. Where either identified issues, PPB worked through those issues and honed its materials. As Paragraph 80 requires, PPB’s training included competency-based evaluations, namely: knowledge checks (i.e., quizzes on directives), in-class responsive quizzes (using clickers to respond to questions presented to the group); knowledge tests (examinations via links PPB sent to each student’s Bureau-issued iPhone); demonstrated skills and oral examination (officers had to show proficiency in first aid skills, weapons use, and defensive tactics); and scenario evaluations (officers had to explain their reasoning for choices after acting through scenarios). These were the same sort of competency-based evaluations we commended in our last report. In this monitoring period, PPB applied the same type of evaluations to supervisory-level training as well as in-service training for all sworn members. PPB successfully has used the surveys, testing, and the training audit.

  • Return or Destruction of PHI At termination of this Agreement, Business Associate hereby agrees to return or destroy all PHI provided by or obtained on behalf of Covered Entity. Business Associate agrees not to retain any copies of the PHI after termination of this Agreement. If return or destruction of the PHI is not feasible, Business Associate agrees to extend the protections of this Agreement to limit any further use or disclosure until such time as the PHI may be returned or destroyed. If Business Associate elects to destroy the PHI, it shall certify to Covered Entity that the PHI has been destroyed.

  • Substantial Completion Date Substantial Completion of the Work as defined in Article 6.1.2 of the General Conditions to the Continuing Contract for Construction Management shall be achieved by July 31, 2022.

  • Notice to Proceed - Site Improvements The Recipient shall not commence, or cause to be commenced, any site improvements or other work on the Land until the Director has issued a Notice to Proceed to the Recipient. Such Notice to Proceed will not be issued until the Director is assured that the Recipient has complied with all requirements for the approval of a grant under Revised Code Sections 164.20 through 164.27 and has completed any land acquisition required by the Project. A Notice to Proceed shall be required for all Project prime contractors or direct procurement initiated by the Recipient following execution of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.