Formalization. According to the provisions of the General Part of these General Terms and Conditions of Contract.
Formalization. Each one of the parties to this Amendment Agreement agrees that, no later than the fifth working day following the date of this Amendment Agreement, each one of the parties shall appear before the notary public or public broker selected by the Trustee, to ratify the signatures of the parties to this Amendment Agreement.
Formalization. Each of the parties hereto hereby agrees that, no later than on the fifth business day following the date of execution hereof, each such party shall appear before a notary public or a commercial notary public (corredor público) selected by the Trustee, to formalize this Agreement.
Formalization. The Federal Government and the Airport Group shall have executed on the same date of this Agreement the applicable Transaction Documents;
Formalization. The Strategic Partner shall have formalized the Transaction Documents on the date of this Agreement;
Formalization obj A formal semantics of monitoring for access permissions is needed as the basis of an implementation that adheres to the design choices. For that reason, we define the calculus λAP as a call-by-value lambda calculus extended with objects and access permissions. For this calculus, we specify the semantics, including monitoring, and prove that it adheres to the properties stated in Sec. 2, in particular, pre-state snapshot and stability of violation. Let’s fix some notation before we start. Given sets A and B, we write ℘(A) for the power set of A, A + B for the disjoint union of A and B, and A × B for their Cartesian product. A ~ B denotes the set of finite (partial) functions from A to B with ∅ standing for the empty mapping and if f ∈ A ~ B, then dom(f ) ⊆ A denotes the domain of f and f ↓At denotes the restriction of f to Aj ⊆ A. The updated function fj = f [a ›→ b] is defined by fj(a) = b and fj(aj) = f (aj), for all aj =ƒ a. We also write [a ›→ b] = ∅[a ›→ b] for the xxxxxxxxx map with domain {a}. If we write f (a) as part of x.p to the object graph reachable x.p = y, where y refers to an object, creates a new path through a premise, this use implies the additional premise a ∈ dom(f ). from y. Sticky update means that the access information for y is kept along with the reference so that a subsequent access through 1 The location-based semantics runs both examples, l1 and m1, without triggering a violation. variable x ∈ Var property name p ∈ Prop access path π ∈ Path = Prop∗ Semantic domains A ∈ Loc infinite set of locations u ∈ Stamp = Integer path language L ∈ PLang = ℘(Path) expression e ∈ Expr ::= x | λx.e | e(e) | new | e.p | e.p := e | permit x : Lr, Lw in e Figure 2. Syntax.
Formalization. The undersigned represent that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of CBP, ICE, USCIS, and Texas, respectively. Furthermore, the undersigned execute this Agreement on behalf of CBP, ICE, USCIS, Texas, respectively. [Signatures on the following pages] Signature for the Department of Homeland Security Department of Homeland Security 1/8/2021 Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx XX Date Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary Signed individually and collectively2 2 “Signed individually and collectively” as used here indicates that the agency is entering into this Agreement both (1) for itself, independently, and (2) along with the other entities that comprise DHS, collectively. Should one agency, for whatever reason, cease to be a party to this Agreement, this Agreement shall still survive for all other parties and be read and interpreted as if the removed party had never been a party to this Agreement. Signature for the Office of the Governor of Texas Office of the Governor of Texas December 31, 2020 Xxxx Xxxxxx Date Governor Signature for the Office of the Attorney General of Texas Office of the Attorney General of Texas 12/31/2020 Xxx Xxxxxx Date
Formalization. This agreement will be formalized by the signature of the agreement between the student, the partner entity and the University of Girona. The cost of each cooperation agreement with businesses or institutions is as stated in the annual budget of the UdG, irrespective of whether or not students receive any funding from the business or entity in question. (Only if rebates are to be applied) As agreed by the Economic, Budget and Heritage Commission of the University’s Social Council on 10 December 2012, a rebate of _______% will be applied to the fees for particular educational cooperation agreements that are linked to curricular practices. The cooperating entity will provide the UdG with name the person who is to sign the agreements that this clause refers to. For the UdG, these agreements will be signed either by the Xxxx or the Chair of the academic centre in which the student is carrying out his/her studies. General conditions for carrying out the practices
Formalization. 5-1-1 Operations involving payment of an advance The Party are considered as having concluded definitively the Agreement after:
Formalization. In any event, the extension of the Production Period must be agreed through an Amendment executed by the authorized, duly empowered Representatives of the Parties.
