Formal Analysis Sample Clauses

Formal Analysis. Output-Responsiveness, Validity and Consistency start
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Formal Analysis. In this subsection, we analyze IoTMAKA using BAN logic. BAN logic analyses protocols by using axioms to verify message origin, message freshness and trustworthiness of the origin of the message [8]. We use the following notations in formal security analysis using the BAN logic: • Q |≡ X: Principal Q believes the statement X. • #(X): Formula X is fresh. • Q| X: Principal Q has jurisdiction over the statement X. • | Q: Principal Q has a public key K. • Q X: Principal Q sees the statement X. • Q| X: Principal Q once said the statement X. • (X, Y): Formula X or Y is one part of the formula (X, Y). • : Formula P combined with the formula Q. • : Principal Q and R may use the shared session key, SK to communicate with each other. The session key SK is good, in that any principal except Q and R. will never discover it. In addition, we use the following BAN logic rules to prove that IoTMAKA provides a secure mutual authentication among IoT device, CS and SS:
Formal Analysis. What: Formal analysis of the SFE Survey data involves all analysis being conducted after the close of the survey and should be guided by the report template provided in Appendix E. In other words, the aim of formal analysis is to generate results that can be included in the full and targeted SFE reports in a similar format as to previous reports. Please refer to the 2012 Full Report for appropriate formatting. Who: The GRA is responsible for conducting all formal analysis. When: Formal analysis should begin either at the close of the SFE Survey or by the 3rd week of November at the latest. Formal analysis should be concluded no later than the end of January.
Formal Analysis. In The AVISPA tool [23], security protocols are speci ed us- ing the High Level Protocol Speci cation Language (HLPSL). The HLPSL speci cation is translated into an Intermediate Format (IF). The current version of the AVISPA tool integrates four back-ends: OFMC, CL-ATSE, SATMC and TA4SP. Before we run veri cations from AVISPA [23], [24], our protocol was written in the High Level Protocol Speci cation Language, or HLPSL. A xxxx xx model was written in order to be suitable for the OFMC validation. Once the HLPSL speci cation was debugged, it was checked automatically for attack detection using the AVISPA veri cation tools. Figure 7 shows the corresponding execution with AVISPA's OFMC tool. No reveals attacks were found, and the security goals concerning privacy and anonymity are reached. The protocol is also safe and a mutual strong authentication is established
Formal Analysis. With the formal validation BAN logic, we provide the proof of correctness of M2MAKA-FS. We demonstrate that a SK with FS can be agreed successfully after the process of mutual authentication among MC and SS. Now, the basic notations of BAN-logic are given below: • P |≡ X: P believes X. • P𝝰X: P sees X. i.e., P has received message containing X. • P|~ X: P said X. i.e., P has sent message containing X. • #(X): X is fresh. i.e., X is usually a temporary value. • P|⟹X: P has jurisdiction over X. • (X, Y): X or Y is part of message (X, Y). • 〈𝑋〉𝑌: X is encrypted with Y. • 𝐾 𝑃 ↔ 𝑄: P and Q can communicate with the shared secret key K. Next, we introduce some BAN logic rules as follows: 𝐾

Related to Formal Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Feasibility Study Buyer will, at Buyer's expense and within ____ days from Effective Date ("Feasibility Study Period"), determine whether the Property is suitable, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, for ___________________ use. During the Feasibility Study Period, Buyer may conduct a Phase I environmental assessment and any other tests, analyses, surveys and investigations ("Inspections") that Buyer deems necessary to determine to Buyer's satisfaction the Property's engineering, architectural and environmental properties; zoning and zoning restrictions; subdivision statutes; soil and grade; availability of access public roads, water, and other utilities; consistency with local, state and regional growth management plans, availability of permits, government approvals, and licenses; and other inspections that Buyer deems appropriate to determine the Property's suitability for the Buyer's intended use. If the Property must be rezoned, Buyer will obtain the rezoning from the appropriatx xxxernment agencies. Seller will sign all documents Buyer is required to file in connection with development or rezoning approvals. Seller gives Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns, the right to enter the Property at any time during the Feasibility Study Period for the purpose of conducting inspections; provided, however, that Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns enter the Property and conduct inspections at their own risk. Buyer will indemnify and hold Seller harmless from xxxxes, damages, costs, claims and expenses of any nature, including attorney's fees, expenses and liability incurred in application for rezoning or related proceedings, and from liability to any person, arising from the conduct of any and all inspections of any work authorized by Buyer. Buyer will not engage in any activity that xxxxx result in a construction lien being filed against the Property without Seller's prior written consent. If this transaction does not close, Buyer will, at Buyer's expense, (1) repair all damages to the Property resulting from the Inspections and return the Property to the condition it was in prior to conduct of the Inspections, and (2) release to Seller all reports and other work generated as a result of the Inspections. Buyer will deliver written notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period of Buyer's determination of whether or not the Properxx xx acceptable. Buyer's failure to comply with this notice requirement will constitute acceptance of the Property as suitable for Buyer's intended use in its "as is" condition. If the Property is unacceptable to Buyer and written notice of this fact is timely delivered to Seller, this Contract will be deemed terminated as of the day after the Feasibility Study period ends and Buyer's deposit(s) will be returned after Escrow Axxxx receives proper authorization form all interested parties.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Industrial Operations Analyst (IOA ‌ The IOA is a GSA Government official who audits Contractor records and conducts Contractor Assistance Visits (CAVs) to the Contractor’s place of business to assist the Contractor with task order reporting, Contract Access Fee (CAF) management, and other general contract administration functions deemed necessary by the Government.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Protocol No action to coerce or censor or penalize any negotiation participant shall be made or implied by any other member as a result of participation in the negotiation process.

  • Synopsis The agreement authorizes the parties to charter space between South Korea, Japan and the U.S. Pacific Coast. Dated: March 28, 2008. By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–6796 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–01–P FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515). Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants: American International Shipping, 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, XX 00000. Officers: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, President, (Qualifying Individual), Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Vice President. Freight Masters Overseas, Inc., 8177 XX 00 Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, XX 00000. Officers: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Managing Director, (Qualifying Individual), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, President. ARC Air Logistics, Inc., 156–15 146th Avenue, Jamaica, NY 11434. Officers: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, President, (Qualifying Individual), Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Secretary. Pacer Container Line, Inc., 0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, XX 00000. Officers: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx, Vice President, (Qualifying Individual), Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, President. Airway Express & Hyundai Express, 000 Xxxxxx Xxxx, Burlingame, CA 94010. Xxx Xxxx Xxxx, Sole Proprietor. Transeagle Cargo Logistics Corp., 0000 Xxxx 00 Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, XX 00000. Officers: Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Vice President, (Qualifying Individual), Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, President. Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder Transportation Intermediary Applicant: ACS Logistics USA Inc., 0 Xxxxxxxx Xxx, Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.