FAMILY AGGREGATION Sample Clauses

FAMILY AGGREGATION. For purposes of determining the Contribution Percentage of a Participant who is a five-percent owner or one of the ten most highly-paid Highly Compensated Employees, the Contribution Percentage Amounts and Compensation of such Employee shall include the Contribution Percentage Amounts and Compensation for the Plan Year of Family Members, as defined in Section 414(q)(6) of the Code. Family Members, with respect to Highly Compensated Employees, shall be disregarded as separate employees in determining the Contribution Percentage both for Participants who are Non-highly Compensated Employees and for Participants who are Highly Compensated Employees.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
FAMILY AGGREGATION. Did pre-SBJPA family aggregation rules apply to Plan Years beginning in? 1997(Y/N) N 2000(Y/N) N 1998(Y/N) N 2001(Y/N) N 1999(Y/N) N 2002(Y/N) N
FAMILY AGGREGATION. The family aggregation rules with respect to coverage and nondiscrimination tests and allocations of Employer Contributions to the Plan did not apply for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 1997.
FAMILY AGGREGATION. Effective for compensation paid to employees for Plan Years beginning on or after September 1, 1997, Section 1.1.30(h) (formerly Section 1.1.28(h)) of the Plan Statement shall be amended to read in full as follows:

Related to FAMILY AGGREGATION

  • Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA (a) Except as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents, there are no “employee benefit plans” (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA) nor any other employee benefit or fringe benefit arrangements, practices, contracts, policies or programs other than programs merely involving the regular payment of wages, commissions, or bonuses established, maintained or contributed to by Parent. Any plans listed in the Parent SEC Documents are hereinafter referred to as the “Parent Employee Benefit Plans.”

  • DISTRIBUTION OF EXCESS AGGREGATE CONTRIBUTIONS The Advisory Committee will determine excess aggregate contributions after determining excess deferrals under Section 14.07 and excess contributions under Section 14.08. If the Advisory Committee determines the Plan fails to satisfy the ACP test for a Plan Year, it must distribute the excess aggregate contributions, as adjusted for allocable income, during the next Plan Year. However, the Employer will incur an excise tax equal to 10% of the amount of excess aggregate contributions for a Plan Year not distributed to the appropriate Highly Compensated Employees during the first 2 1/2 months of that next Plan Year. The excess aggregate contributions are the amount of aggregate contributions allocated on behalf of the Highly Compensated Employees which causes the Plan to fail to satisfy the ACP test. The Advisory Committee will distribute to each Highly Compensated Employee his respective share of the excess aggregate contributions. The Advisory Committee will determine the respective shares of excess aggregate contributions by starting with the Highly Compensated Employee(s) who has the greatest contribution percentage, reducing his contribution percentage (but not below the next highest contribution percentage), then, if necessary, reducing the contribution percentage of the Highly Compensated Employee(s) at the next highest contribution percentage level (including the contribution percentage of the Highly Compensated Employee(s) whose contribution percentage the Advisory Committee already has reduced), and continuing in this manner until the ACP for the Highly Compensated Group satisfies the ACP test. If the Highly Compensated Employee is part of an aggregated family group, the Advisory Committee, in accordance with the applicable Treasury regulations, will determine each aggregated family member's allocable share of the excess aggregate contributions assigned to the family unit.

  • Cost Sharing CHIP Network Providers and Out-of-Network Providers may collect copayments authorized in the CHIP State Plan from CHIP Members. CHIP families that meet the enrollment period cost share limit requirement must report it to the HHSC Administrative Services Contractor. The HHSC Administrative Service Contractor notifies the MCO that a family’s cost share limit has been reached. Upon notification from the HHSC Administrative Services Contractor that a family has reached its cost-sharing limit for the term of coverage, the MCO will generate and mail to the CHIP Member a new Member ID card within five calendar days, showing that the CHIP Member’s cost-sharing obligation for that term of coverage has been met. No cost-sharing may be collected from these CHIP Members for the balance of their term of coverage. Providers are responsible for collecting all Member copayments at the time of service. Copayments that families must pay vary according to their income level. Copayments do not apply, at any income level, to Covered Services that qualify as well-baby and well-child care services, preventive services, or pregnancy-related services as defined by 42 C.F.R. §457.520 and SSA § 2103(e)(2). Except for costs associated with unauthorized non-emergency services provided to a Member by Out-of-Network providers and for non-covered services, the copayments outlined in the CHIP Cost Sharing Table in Uniform Managed Care Manual Chapter 6.3, “CHIP Cost Sharing,” are the only amounts that an MCO may impose and a provider may collect from a CHIP-eligible family. As required by 42 C.F.R. §457.515, this includes, without limitation, Emergency Services that are provided at an Out-of-Network facility. Cost sharing for such Emergency Services is limited to the copayment amounts set forth in the CHIP Cost Sharing Table. If the MCO would have paid a lesser amount than the CHIP copayment in the absence of a CHIP copayment, then the copayment amount will be capped at the lesser amount. Federal law prohibits charging premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or any other cost-sharing to Members of Native Americans or Alaskan Natives. The HHSC Administrative Services Contractor will notify the MCO of Members who are not subject to cost sharing requirements. The MCO is responsible for educating Providers regarding the cost sharing waiver for this population. An MCO’s monthly Capitation Payment will not be adjusted for a family’s failure to make its CHIP premium payment. There is no relationship between HHSC’s Capitation Payment to the MCO for coverage provided during a month and the family’s payment of its CHIP premium obligation for that month. Cost sharing does not apply to CHIP Perinatal Program Members. The exemption from cost sharing applies through the end of the enrollment period. As of the Effective Date of the Contract, cost sharing does not apply to Medicaid Members. If HHSC implements cost-sharing for Medicaid Members after the Effective Date of this Contract, the requirements of this section will apply, and HHSC will amend the Uniform Managed Care Manual to include Medicaid Cost Sharing Tables. Except for costs associated with unauthorized non-emergency services provided to a Member by Out-of-Network providers and for non-covered services, the Medicaid copayments outlined in the Uniform Managed Care Manual will be the only amounts that an MCO may impose and a provider may collect from a Medicaid-eligible family.

  • Profit Sharing 10.1 The Publisher shall pay the Developer the following share of profits as follows:

  • Employer Profit Sharing Contributions An Employee will be eligible to become a Participant in the Plan for purposes of receiving an allocation of any Employer Profit Sharing Contribution made pursuant to Section 10 of the Adoption Agreement after completing ________ (enter 0, 1, 2 or any fraction less than 2)

  • Employee Benefit Plans; New Hires; Pay Increases Adopt any employee benefit or stock purchase or option plan, or hire any new director level or officer level employee, pay any special bonus or special remuneration to any employee or director, or increase the salaries or wage rates of its employees;

  • ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments The Parent does not, and since its inception never has, maintained, or contributed to any “employee pension benefit plans” (as defined in Section 3(2) of ERISA), “employee welfare benefit plans” (as defined in Section 3(1) of ERISA) or any other Parent Benefit Plan for the benefit of any current or former employees, consultants, officers or directors of Parent.

  • Benefit Plans; ERISA (a) Section 2.09(a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a true and complete list and description of each of the Benefit Plans and identifies each of the Benefit Plans that is a Qualified Plan and relates to Employees.

  • Discretionary Sales The Collateral Manager may direct the Trustee to sell (in addition to any sales pursuant to clauses (a) through (e) above) any Collateral Obligation to any party other than ORCC at any time other than during a Restricted Trading Period if after giving effect to such sale, the Aggregate Principal Balance of all Collateral Obligations sold as described in this Section 12.1(g) during the preceding period of 12 calendar months (or, for the first 12 calendar months after the Closing Date, during the period commencing on the Closing Date) is not greater than 25% of the Collateral Principal Amount as of the first day of such 12 calendar month period (or as of the Closing Date, as the case may be).

  • Compensating Balance Arrangement The Funds and The Bank of New York have entered into a compensating balance arrangement, which would allow the Funds to compensate the Bank for any overdrafts by maintaining a positive cash balance the next day. Conversely, on any day the Funds maintain a positive balance, they will be allowed to overdraw the account as compensation. In both cases, Federal Reserve requirements, currently 10%, will be assessed. Therefore, all overdrafts must be compensated at 100% of the total and all positive balances will allow for an overdraft of 90% of the total. Balances for the tax-exempt portfolios will be permitted an open-ended roll forward. The taxable portfolios are closed out on a quarterly basis with no carry-over to the subsequent quarter. At the end of each quarter, the average overdraft will be assessed a fee of 1% above the actual Federal Funds rate at the end of the period. Any average positive balance will receive an earnings credit computed at the daily effective 90 day T-xxxx rate minus 0.25 bps on the last day of the period. Earnings credits will be offset against the Funds’ safekeeping fees. GLOBAL CUSTODY (Non-US Securities Processing) Global Safekeeping Fee Transaction Fee Countries *(in basis points)1 (U.S. Dollars)2 Argentina 17.00 55 Australia 1.50 25 Austria 3.00 40 Bahrain 50.00 140 Bangladesh 50.00 000 Xxxxxxx 2.50 35 Bermuda 17.00 70 Botswana 50.00 140 Brazil 12.00 30 Bulgaria 30.00 85 Canada 1.00 10 Chile 20.00 80 China “A” Shares 15.00 80 China “B” Shares 15.00 60 Colombia 50.00 00 Xxxxx Xxxx 14.00 65 Croatia 25.00 00 Xxxxxx 00.00 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx 18.00 50 Denmark 2.00 00 Xxxxxxx 30.00 55 Egypt 30.00 85 Estonia 10.00 60 Euromarket/Euroclear3 1.00 10 Euromarket/Clearstream 1.00 10 Finland 3.50 35 France 2.00 30 Germany 1.50 25 Ghana 50.00 000 Xxxxxx 9.00 40 Hong Kong 3.00 45 Hungary 20.00 55 Iceland 11.00 35 India 13.00 105 Indonesia 11.00 80 Ireland (Equities) 3.00 33 Ireland (Gov’t Bonds) 1.00 13 Israel 20.00 40 Italy 1.50 35 Ivory Coast 50.00 140 Jamaica 50.00 60 Japan 1.75 20 Jordan 50.00 140 Kazakhstan 53.00 140 Kenya 48.00 000 Xxxxxx 50.00 45 Lebanon 50.00 140 Lithuania 20.00 43 Luxembourg 10.00 80 Malaysia 4.50 45 Malta 20.00 63 Mauritius 25.00 000 Xxxxxx 6.50 30 Morocco 50.00 95 Namibia 50.00 60 Netherlands 2.00 25 New Zealand 2.00 35 Nigeria 50.00 60 Norway 2.50 35 Oman 50.00 140 Pakistan 50.00 000 Xxxx 50.00 83 Philippines 6.00 60 Poland 15.00 63 Portugal 5.00 50 Qatar 50.00 140 Romania 30.00 80 Russia Equities 40.00 95 Singapore 3.50 00 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx 23.00 95 Slovenia 50.00 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxx 2.50 30 South Korea 6.50 00 Xxxxx 0.00 00 Xxx Xxxxx 13.00 70 Swaziland 50.00 60 Sweden 2.00 30 Switzerland 2.00 35 Taiwan 10.00 60 Thailand 5.00 00 Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx 50.00 53 Tunisia 50.00 53 Turkey 12.50 60 Ukraine 75.00 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx 0.50 10 Uruguay 75.00 83 Venezuela 50.00 140 Zambia 50.00 140 Zimbabwe 50.00 140 Not In Bank/Not in Custody Assets USA4………………………$500 per line per annum Third Party Foreign Exchange Settlements $70 per non-USD currency movement Minimum charges imposed by Agent Banks/Local Administrators Brazil - 15 basis points for annual administrative charges Colombia - USD $600 per month minimum administration charge Ecuador - USD $800 monthly minimum per relationship Egypt - USD $400 monthly minimum per relationship Additional Charges Local taxes, stamp duties or other assessments, including stock exchange fees, postage and insurance for shipping, facsimile reporting, extraordinary telecommunications fees or other unusual expenses, which are unique to a country in which the Funds are investing Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and The Funds listed on Schedule II to the Custody Agreement, as amended from time to time This Amendment (the “Amendment”) dated as of November 8, 2007 between The Bank of New York (“Custodian”) and the Funds listed on Schedule II to the Custody Agreement, as amended by Exhibit A attached hereto (each a “Fund”).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.