Falls Far Below Target Sample Clauses

Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 2.b.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (141)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. EXHIBIT B.2 .‌ ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK The purpose of the Organizational Performance Framework is to communicate to the charter school and public the compliance-related standards, which the charter school must meet. The Organizational Framework includes the standards that the charter school is already required to meet through state and federal law, rules or the charter contract. NACSA Principles & Standards (2012) states that, “A Quality Authorizer implements an accountability system that effectively streamlines federal, state, and local…compliance requirements while protecting schools’ legally entitled autonomy and minimizing schools’ administrative and reporting burdens” (p. 16). For each measure a school receives one of three ratings. For the purposes of defining organizational performance accountability, “material” means whether the information would be relevant and significant to decisions about whether to renew, non-renew, or revoke a charter contract. Meets Standard: The school materially meets the expectations outlined. Does Not Meet Standard: The school has failed to implement the program in the manner described; the failure(s) were material, but the board has instituted remedies that have resulted in compliance or prompt and sufficient movement toward compliance to the satisfaction of the authorizer.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (35)
Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 1.b. Unrestricted Days Cash: Unrestricted Cash divided by ((Total Expenses-Depreciation Expenses)/365) Preliminary Rating Final Rating (Following Additional Analysis) Meets Target:  60 Days Cash or Meets Target:  Indicates sound financial viability based on the overall financial record. Either the school has already met the
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (31)
Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 2.d. Unrestricted Fund Balance Percentage: Fund balance / Total Expenses Preliminary Rating Final Rating (Following Additional Analysis) Meets Target:  Fund balance percentage is greater than or equal to 25% Meets Target:  Indicates sound financial viability based on the overall financial record. Either the school has already met the target based on the financials under review, or previous financial concerns that produced a preliminary Pending rating have been adequately remedied based on more current financial data or addressed adequately based on additional information such that the Commission concludes that performance against the target indicates sound financial viability. Pending Further Analysis:  Fund balance percentage is less than 25% Does Not Meet Target:  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission concludes that there is financial risk such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention may be warranted. A Does Not Meet rating means that even based on more current financial information, the school is not currently meeting the target or concerns previously identified, although not currently manifested, have been of a depth or duration that warrants continued attention.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (30)
Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further analysis, the school’s performance on this component signals a significant financial risk to the school. 2.e.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (30)
Falls Far Below Target. 🞏 Upon further analysis, the school’s performance on this component signals a significant financial risk to the school. 2.e. Change in Total Fund Balance: Multi-Year= (𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟑 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞) − (𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞); One-Year= (𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟐 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞) − (𝐘��𝐚𝐫 𝟏 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞) Preliminary Rating Final Rating (Following Additional Analysis)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Falls Far Below Target. A Falls Far Below rating indicates that upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. The school’s rating will be based on both the most recent audited financials and more current unaudited financials. The Commission will also consider any relevant context for the school’s financial position that informs the causes of the school’s substantial shortcomings for the area in question. Appropriate monitoring and/intervention will be determined, in part, by how the rating on the standard in question fits within the school’s overall performance on the framework.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Falls Far Below Target.  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 2. SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS 2.a. Total Margin: Net Income divided by Total Revenue Aggregated Total Margin: Total 3 Year Net Income divided by Total 3 Year Revenues Preliminary Rating Final Rating (Following Additional Analysis)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Falls Far Below Target

  • Falls Far Below Standard  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 2.c.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:

  • PRICING for Markup of Non-Prepriced Items in RS Means Unit Price Book What is your proposed Markup Percentage on materials not found in the RS Means Price Book? If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and mark them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Post-Award Small Business Program Re Representation If applicable, The Contractor shall report timely and accurately their small business program re-representation and update XXX.xxx.

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx 8 Choice of Law clauses with TIPS Members If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. 9

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • REQUIRED FOR PART 2 JOC - PRICING OF Regular Hours Coefficient What is your regular hours coefficient for the RS Means Price Book? (FAILURE TO RESPOND PROHIBITS PART 2 JOC EVALUATION) Remember that this is a ceiling price proposed. You can discount lower than your proposed contract coefficient, but not higher. This is one of three pricing questions that are required for consideration for award on this solicitation. Please consider your answer carefully. An explanation of the TIPS scoring of pricing is included in the attachments for your information. The below is an Example of how pricing model works (not intended to influence your proposed coefficient, you should propose a coefficient that you determine is right for your business): To propose the exact pricing as the RS Means Unit Price Book, you would insert a 1.0 and to propose a 5% discount for the RS Means Price Book would be a .95 regular hours coefficient and so on.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.