Facility Design. Seller shall be responsible for designing and building the Facility in compliance with all Permits and according to Prudent Electric Industry Practice with respect to project design, engineering and selection and installation of equipment to be used at or installed in the Facility. At PGE’s request, Seller shall provide PGE with copies of the site plan for the Facility and descriptions, for the project design of the Facility. Any review by PGE of the design, construction, operation or maintenance of the Facility is solely for PGE’s information, and PGE shall have no responsibility to Seller or any third party in connection with such review. Seller is solely responsible for the economic and technical feasibility, operational capability and reliability of the Facility.
Facility Design. Operator agrees that the Establishment shall be designed, constructed and improved to reflect high quality construction standards and to improve the general design aesthetic of the area. Internally lit and flashing signs shall not be permitted.
Facility Design. We are planning for a specifically designed facility that connects well to our school mission and vision and lends itself to outdoor educational areas. Summit Place School intends to use the entirety of its facility, and outdoor space. Flexible and adaptable classrooms and outdoor areas will facilitate this approach. The design is important to be open and flexible, extending into outdoor environments. Ideally, we’d like to have our school built next to a park or other community facility to provide additional outdoor space for classes and for school gatherings, festivals, or plays where the community is welcome to attend. For example, a community park and soccer fields are within reasonable walking distance.
Facility Design. Suitability ▪ School facilities are not designed for some of the activities being undertaken by users, and the growing demand for space that can accommodate activities such as soccer ▪ School designs often to do not consider community use and security requirements to facilitate community use, e.g., separation of classrooms and offices from gymnasiums and other public spaces Comparison of March 2006 and November 2005 Issue Theme Rankings As noted previously, the issue themes identified during the March 2006 consultations were the same as those that emerged during the November 2005 consultations, but there were some modest variations in the ranking of the issues and challenges. The top three issues deemed of most significance by participants in March and November were identical – funding adequacy, space and time booking and access to local schools. The most significant variance was that March 2006 participants rated transparency and accountability as more highly significant than did the participants in the November 2005 sessions, and placed less importance on the issue of facility design suitability. The following compares the March 2006 issue theme rankings with the November 2005 rankings. March, 2006 November, 2005
Facility Design. The Licensee shall pay an aggregate amount of approximately $[**Confidential Treatment Requested] in connection with the Licensor’s consulting services related to the design of the Manufacturing facility, payable under terms and conditions to be negotiated.
Facility Design. Reviews are technical reviews of manufacturing facilities, and they are conducted to ensure best practices in manufacturing are captured prior to commencing construction activities. FCE proposes both preliminary and final Facility Design Reviews.
Facility Design. It is understood that KindredBio/CRB is responsible for the overall facility design, including utility supplies. However, it is understood that Pall as the equipment supplier would need to be fully involved in equipment layout to ensure optimized ergonomics and utility point placement. The labor for this support is part of the overall project coordination, design and engineering support and project management described in section 4.3. Upon request by Kindred, Pall would be able to discuss 3D facility concepts in more detail.
Facility Design. Section 4.1 - Within (30) Thirty days after the date hereof, BEARD shall submit a proposed design for a two hundred (200) TPH Poxx Xxnes Recovery Facility to PMC for Approval. Within fourteen (14) days after PMC's receipt of BEARD's proposed design of that Facility, PMC either will grant Appxxxxx xf BEARD's design or will submit to BEARD its written proposed revisioxx xx xhe design of that Facility. Xx PMC submits proposed revisions to BEARD's proposed design, BEARD will promptly incorporate into the pxxxxxxx design of the Facxxxxx all mutually acceptable revisions and resubmit the design of the Facility to PMC for its Approval. Within seven (7) days after PMC's receipt of that revised design, PMC will provide written Approval or rejection of the design to BEARD. Promptly after receipt of PMC's written Approval of the propxxxx design of the Pond Fines Recovery Facility and BEARD's receipt of required state and federal regulatory authorizatxxxx, XEARD, at its sole expense, shall commence construction and installxxxxx of the Pond Fines Recovery Facility.
Facility Design. Western shall develop a design and budget for the Conveyor, including a route lay-out, equipment selection, structure design and location, and identify any necessary ancillary structures and equipment, consistent with good engineering practices as observed in the industry. Western and the Plant Owners shall cooperate in establishing the location and design of the interface facilities at the terminus of the Conveyor. Within sixty (60) days after the date of this Agreement. Western shall submit the proposed design and budget to the Operator of the Generating Plant described in Section 15 of this Agreement. The Operator shall coordinate the review and approval of the Conveyor design and budget by the Plant Owners. The Plant Owners, through the Operator of the Generating Plant, shall perform and conduct their review in an expedient manner in order to avoid delays to either the permitting or construction of the Conveyor. The final design and budget for the Conveyor shall be subject to the approval of Western and the Plant Owners.
Facility Design. The overall site design was optimized by the project team and Willow Run Foods staff for maximum use of the electrical connections. It was determined that five (5) connections would be installed. Four (4) of these eTRU connections would be located at docks where a DokLok dock connection safety system would be integrated into their operation. The fifth location would be a staging area with no dock or existing safety system. Figure 2-2: One-line diagram of Willow Run Foods electrical wiring From conversations with the dock safety system manufacturer, Rite-Xxxx Corporation, and Willow Run Foods, it was determined that the exact locations for these connections would be Docks 23, 24, 27, and 28 and the staging area would be between Docks 42 and 43. These dock locations were chosen based upon the model of safety system currently installed as well as wall clearance from permanent exterior structures like roof drainage downspouts. The staging area was chosen because it was the most convenient location to install the hardware for trailer usage and costs. Approximate positions of the connections can be seen in the drawing in Figure 2-2.
