External reviews Sample Clauses

External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified 35 external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a tenure and 36 promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the external reviewers, but 37 the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is to obtain the best judgments from the 38 most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas. Most, if not all, of the external reviewers 39 should be at the rank for which the candidate is being considered or above (i.e., associate 40 professor or professor for tenure and promotion to associate professor; professor for promotion 41 to professor). Reviewers generally should come from comparable institutions or programs. The 42 suggestions regarding rank and affiliations of external reviewers apply to the majority of the 43 reviewers and are not strict prohibitions, so there is flexibility to meet particular circumstances. 44 A minimum of five substantive external evaluations is required for a tenure case to move 45 forward. 1 The department or unit head will recruit external reviewers from this list and provide them 2 with the candidate’s signed and dated curriculum vitae, signed and dated personal statement, 3 the candidate’s scholarship portfolio and the department’s or unit’s adopted criteria for 4 promotion and tenure.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
External reviews. (a) Any enrollee who has exhausted the internal appeals mechanisms provided by a claims payer and the plan administrator under Sections 2 and 3, may appeal to the plan administrator for external review.
Sample 1Sample 2
External reviews. For each subsequent external review beyond 5 total reviews per year, a fee of $500 will apply per review Personal Health Support with Disease Management Services $3.47** per Employee per month Wellness Coaching Services Included in Choice Plus HRA medical service fee; no charge for Choice Plus Plan. Wellness Plan File Feeds $1,765 Fee Waived for up to five feeds during 2013. **Fees are calculated in the administrative fee credit Amendment Part V. The parties agree that Exhibit C titled - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEALTH BENEFITS of the Agreement as previously amended by Amendment Part V of the Eighth Amendment to the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows EXHIBIT C
Sample 1
External reviews. The Trust shall be subject to periodic external reviews of its programme and of its management by an independent review panel appointed by the Executive Board, after consultation with the Governing Body and the Donors’ Council, as appropriate, with regard to the terms of reference of the review and composition of the Panel. Such reviews will take place every three to five years or more often if so determined by the Executive Board. The Governing Body of the International Treaty, or the Donors’ Council, may call for extraordinary external reviews.
Sample 1
External reviews. Oracle may conduct independent reviews of Cloud Services utilizing third parties in the followingareas (the scope of any such reviews may vary by service and country): • SOC 1 (based on Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No 18) and/or SOC 2 reports • Other independent third-party security testing to review the effectiveness of administrative and technical controls Relevant information from these reviews may be made available to customers.
Sample 1
External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a tenure and promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the external reviewers, but the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is to obtain the best judgments from the most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas. Most, if not all, of the external reviewers should be at the rank for which the candidate is being considered or above (i.e., associate professor or professor for tenure and promotion to associate professor; professor for promotion to professor). Reviewers generally should come from comparable institutions or programs. The suggestions regarding rank and affiliations of external reviewers apply to the majority of the reviewers and are not strict prohibitions, so there is flexibility to meet particular circumstances. A minimum of five substantive external evaluations is required for a tenure case to move forward. The department or unit head will recruit external reviewers from this list and provide them with the candidate’s signed and dated curriculum vitae, signed and dated personal statement, the candidate’s scholarship portfolio and the department’s or unit’s adopted criteria for promotion and tenure.
Sample 1
External reviews. For each subsequent external review beyond 5 total reviews per year, a fee of $500 will apply per review Wellness Coaching Services 2012 Fee Waived Amendment Part V. The parties agree that Exhibit C titled - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEALTH BENEFITS of the Agreement as previously amended by Amendment Part III of the Seventh Amendment to the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows EXHIBIT C
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to External reviews

  • External Review In the event of a final internal Adverse Benefit Determination, a Claimant may be entitled to an external review of the Claim. This request must be submitted in writing on an External Review Request form within 120 days of receipt of the Adverse Benefit Determination. The external reviewer will render a recommendation within 45 calendar days unless the request meets expedited criteria, in which case it will be resolved in no later than 72 hours. The external reviewer’s recommendation will be binding. The external reviewer will notify the Claimant of its decision in writing, and the Plan will take action as appropriate to comply with such recommendation. For detailed information about the external review process, please contact XxXxx’s Member Engagement Center.

  • Annual Reviews The Recipient shall:

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Informal Review Step 1. As soon as practicable, the employee may discuss the grievance with his/her immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s). All parties may informally attempt a resolution of the matter before a formal grievance is filed. Informal resolutions, although final, shall not be precedent setting. If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussion with the immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s), the employee may file a formal grievance as set forth below.

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • Internal Investigations (A) The parties recognize that Florida Highway Patrol personnel occupy a special place in American society. Therefore, it is understood that the state has the right to expect that a professional standard of conduct be adhered to by all Florida Highway Patrol personnel regardless of rank or assignment. Since internal investigations may be undertaken to inquire into complaints of Florida Highway Patrol misconduct, the state reserves the right to conduct such investigations to uncover the facts in each case, but expressly agrees to carefully guard and protect the rights and dignity of accused personnel. In the course of an internal investigation, the investigative methods employed will be consistent with the law (including but not limited to section 112.532, Florida Statutes) and this agreement; nothing in this agreement, however, shall be deemed to diminish the rights of employees under applicable law.

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • External monitoring The external monitoring and audit referred to in Articles 11.1, 11.2, 11.3 and 11.4 of the Regulation shall not in any way relieve the National Focal Point or the Programme Operator of their obligations under the legal framework regarding monitoring of the Programme and/or its projects, financial control and audit.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.