Expertise review Sample Clauses

Expertise review. Employees will have their expertise assessed in relation to their discipline/program/service group in accordance with Article 1.8 Following consultation between the School Chair/Department Head and department members, the appropriate Administrator will consult the affected Department Head and he/she will determine the expertise requirements in accordance with Article 1.8 for those disciplines/programs/service groups that could be affected by layoff. In the event that an employee is teaching or working in more than one discipline/program/service group, then the expertise review will be carried out within each discipline/program/service group in which that employee teaches or works. The following procedures will apply with respect to expertise reviews as a result of layoffs and/or reductions. There is an expectation that the Expertise Review Procedure will be conducted in a confidential manner. If two employees are deemed to have the expertise, Terms of Appointment and Seniority will determine who will be laid off. Expertise is assessed in a pass/fail manner. A member either has or does not have the expertise to do the job. Gradations of expertise will not be determined. Neither the College nor the Association will advertise or solicit applications for expertise review and exercising of bumping rights. A person may only bump into a full course/section and not proportions thereof. It is the responsibility of the member to initiate this process by submitting written intent to the College to exercise his/her bumping rights and identifying the position(s) he/she wish to bump into; as per Article 5.4 (b). The College will acknowledge receipt of the submission in writing. Upon acknowledging receipt of the application, the College will notify the Xxxx of the targeted area, the member(s) in the targeted position(s), and the SCFA of the initiation of an expertise review. The College will provide the member initiating the expertise review with the following material: • relevant, current course outline(s), and • the most recent posting for the work, if there has been one in the preceding 5 years, or an updated job description. The committee to review the application will consist of: • the Xxxx of the targeted area, • the School Chair or Department Head of the targeted area, • the Coordinator of the targeted area if appropriate, • A senior unaffected department member (normally in the affected discipline/program/service group), and • The Chair of the Curriculum Committe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Expertise review. Employees will have their expertise assessed in relation to their discipline/program/service group in accordance with Article 1.8 Following consultation between the School Chair/Department Head and department members, the appropriate Administrator will consult the affected Department Head and he/she will determine the expertise requirements in accordance with Article 1.8 for those disciplines/programs/service groups that could be affected by layoff. In the event that an employee is teaching or working in more than one discipline/program/service group, then the expertise review will be carried out within each discipline/program/service group in which that employee teaches or works.

Related to Expertise review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.