Evaluator Signature. Date: I have reviewed this evaluation and discussed its contents with the evaluator. My signature means that I have been advised of my performance and have been given the opportunity to make comments, but does not necessarily imply agreement with the evaluation or the contents.
Evaluator Signature. Date Teacher Signature Date The signatures above verify that the teacher and evaluator have discussed and agreed upon this Professional Growth Plan. APPENDIX A.3a Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Improvement Plan Improvement Plan Teacher Name: Grade Level/ Subject: School year: Building: Date of Improvement Plan Conference: Written improvement plans are to be developed in the circumstances when an educator receives an overall ineffective rating or an ineffective rating on any of the components of the OTES system. The purpose of the improvement plan is to identify specific deficiencies in performance and xxxxxx growth through professional development and targeted support. If corrective actions are not made within the time as specified in the improvement plan, a recommendation may be made for dismissal or to continue on the plan.
Evaluator Signature. ☐ Photocopy to Teacher Final Holistic Rating of Teacher Effectiveness—Full Evaluation I N E F F E C T I V E D E V E L O P I N G S K I L L E D A C C O M P L I S H E D Formal Holistic Observation (followed by conference) Formal Focused Observation Focus Area(s): Focus for Learning Knowledge of Students Lesson Delivery Classroom Environment Assessment of Student Learning Professional Responsibilities Professional Growth Plan (or Improvement Plan) Goal(s): (Goal prepopulates from the earlier entry) Evaluator Comments: Teacher Comments: Final Holistic (Overall) Rating I N E F F E C T I V E D E V E L O P I N G S K I L L E D A C C O M P L I S H E D Check here if Improvement Plan has been recommended. Teacher Signature Date Evaluator Signature Date Final Holistic Rating of Teacher Effectiveness—Accomplished or Skilled Carry Forward Professional Growth Plan Goal(s) Alignment: Dates: Mark Domain Area(s): Focus for Learning Knowledge of Students Lesson Delivery Classroom Environment Assessment of Student Learning Professional Responsibilities Focus Area(s) Comments: Date of Observation: Date of Conference: Comments:
Evaluator Signature. Date Employee's Comments (optional): ADDENDUM G Performance Evaluation Liberty School District Paraeducator Employee Name: Annual 90 Day Date Evaluation is conducted to: Promote a better understanding of job requirements Explain overall expectations of adminstrators & supervisors Recognize the individual employee's level of competence Encourage professional growth and improvement of school district programs Definitions of Performance Ratings: S - Satisfactory - Competent & dependable level of performance. Meets performance standards of the job I - Improvement Needed - Improvement is necessary. U - Unsatisfactory - Results are generally unacceptable & require immediate improvement. N/A - Not applicable or too soon to be rated.
Evaluator Signature. Date: ______ The written observation must be provided to the unit member within five (5) school days of the observation. The original will be placed in the unit member's personnel file. Unit members have the opportunity to respond to the contents of this observation in writing. APPENDIX C - 2 EVALUATION FORM Name: Evaluator: Work Location: ------ Date of Evaluation: PERFORMANCE AREA STANDARD LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE JOB PERFORMANCE & ORGANIZATION E p NI u • Reviews IEP accommodations and modifications with appropriate professionals to ensure ongoing student success • Displays interest and enthusiasm at work • Maintains regular attendance and is punctual • Demonstrates ability to manage complex/varied tasks simultaneously • Supervises students as directed • Demonstrates flexibility and adjusts to change • Demonstrates initiative and resourcefulness • Uses work time productively Comments: Overall Rating XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX INSTRUCTIONAL KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS E p NI u • Implements IEP/504 goals under the direction of the Special Education Teacher, classroom teacher and or specialist • Provides support services in all environments of the school setting • • Works well with groups or individual students Is successful in the reinforcement of skills Maintains confidentiality of individual students and their families • • Attends in-service professional development activities appropriate to their position. • Completes tasks as directed Comments: Overall Rating PERFORMANCE AREA STANDARD LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE E INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS & COMMUNICATIONS WITH STUDENTS • Establishes and maintains age- appropriate boundaries • Uses developmentally and age- appropriate language, strategies, equipment, materials, and technologies in a manner that facilitates student learning • Carries out instructions related to methods or techniques to be used with students • Manages student behavior effectively • Promotes student safety • Demonstrates an understanding of student differences • Exhibits patience and appropriate expectations with students Comments: Overall Rating p NI u PERFORMANCE AREA STANDARD LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS and E p NI u COMMUNICATIONS WITH ADULTS • Accepts guidance and constructive suggestions; seeks clarification if needed • Is a cooperative team member and supports district values and mission • Consults with special education teachers as needed • Is tactful and considerate of others Comments: Overall Rating Additional comme...
Evaluator Signature. Date: The evaluator’s signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been followed. Findlay City Schools Teacher Evaluation System Improvement Plan: Evaluation of Plan Teacher Name: Grade Level/Subject: School Year: Building: Date of Evaluation: The improvement plan will be evaluated at the end of the time specified in the plan. Outcomes from the improvement plan demonstrate the following action to be taken; • Improvement is demonstrated and performance standards are met to a satisfactory level of performance* • The Improvement Plan should continue for a time specified: • Improvement Plan is not being met to appropriate level. Comments: Provide justification for recommendation indicated above and attach evidence to support recommended course of action. Teacher’s signature: Date: Evaluator’s Signature: Date: The evaluator’s signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been followed. ✵ The acceptable level of performance varies depending on the teacher’s years of experience. Teachers in residency-specifically in years 1 through 4-are expected to perform at the Developing level or above. Experienced teachers-with five or more years’ experience-are expected to meet the Skilled level or above. 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 APPENDIX C
Evaluator Signature. DATE: The written observation must be provided to the unit member within five (S) school days of the observation. The unit member will receive a copy of the observation for review and a signatory copy once s/he signs the document; the original will be placed in the unit member's personnel file. Unit members have the opportunity to respond to this form in writing. ~28 ~ APPENDIX B - 2 / EVALUATION FORM NAME: ---------------- WORK LOCATION: ______ EVALUATOR: _ DATE OF EVALUATION: _ __ _
Evaluator Signature. Directions: This form serves as a record of a walkthrough by the teacher’s evaluator. The evaluator will likely not observe all the teaching elements listed below in any one informal observation, nor is this an exhaustive list of evidence that may be observed. This record, along with records of additional informal observations, will be used to inform the holistic evaluation of the teacher. EVALUATOR OBSERVATIONS ☐ Teacher is consistent and effective in communicating appropriate, needs-based, differentiated learning goals ☐ Communication strategies and questioning techniques check for understanding and encourage higher-level thinking ☐ Instructional time is used effectively ☐ Information is presented in multiple formats ☐ Teacher combines collaborative and whole class learning opportunities ☐ Routines, procedures and transitions are consistent, effective and maximize instructional time ☐ Rapport and expectations for respectful, supportive and caring interactions with and among students and the teacher are evident ☐ Feedback is substantive, specific, timely and supports student learning ☐ Lesson makes clear and coherent connections with student prior learning and future learning ☐ Teacher selects, develops and uses multiple assessments ☐ Teacher demonstrates content knowledge and uses content-specific language and strategies to engage students ☐ Teacher uses differentiated instructional strategies and resources for groups of students ☐ Other: ☐ Other: Identified Focus Area(s) and Aligned Evidence, if Applicable: Evaluator Summary Comments:
Evaluator Signature. 🞏 Photocopy to Teacher APPENDIX A - Form 3 - Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Matrix APPENDIX A - Form 4 - Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Final Summative Rating Final Summative Rating of Teacher Effectiveness Proficiency on Standards 50% I N E F F E C T I V E D E V E L O P I N G S K I L L E D A C C O M P L I S H E D Cumulative Performance Rating (Holistic Rating using Performance Rubric) Areas of reinforcement/refinement: Student Growth Data 50% B E L O W E X P E C T E D G R O W T H E x p e c t e d Gr o w t h A B O V E E X P E C T E D G R O W T H Student Growth Measure of Effectiveness Areas of reinforcement/refinement: Final Summative (Overall) Rating I N E F F E C T I V E D E V E L O P I N G S K I L L E D A C C O M P L I S H E D �� Check here if Improvement Plan has been recommended. Teacher Signature Date
