Evaluation Scope Sample Clauses

Evaluation Scope. Performance ratings and narrative comments included on the evaluations shall only address work performance that occurred during the particular period covered by the evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Scope. Formal evaluations shall consider the employee's total performance in and for the School District. The Evaluation will include Student Growth as a component of the Overall Evaluation Rating using guidelines established by the Student Growth Joint Committee.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Scope. ‌ The main focus of this Scope is on the evaluation performance indicators, measures and activities. In addition to describing the process of how the evaluation is carried out and what resources are used, mathematical descriptions (to a certain degree) can be used to formalise performance indicators and measures that can later be calculated. The major groups used here are: KPI structure group The KPI structure group describes the key performance indicators and how they are calculated. The later part is denoted through the structure of the KPIs. Concept Comment
Sample 1
Evaluation Scope. The evaluation will be used to improve the Xxxx.xxx program (curriculum and implementation) and seeks to answer questions such as the following: ● How effectively do teachers prepared by the Xxxx.xxx program teach computer science? ● Do the students in the Xxxx.xxx program learn computer science? ● What impact does studying computer science have on these students’ other academic achievements (for example in mathematics, science, and English)? The Entity may provide the Evaluator de-identified individual student data (with a unique de- identified student number for the purposes of analyzing student performance over time): ● Computer science assessment results of students, including average AP scores for xxxx.xxx classrooms, both before and after participation in the Xxxx.xxx program ● De-identified student demographic information: gender, ethnicity, grade level, free/reduced-lunch status, English language learner status, graduation status, and special education status. If certain demographic information (such as ethnicity) would allow direct identification of specific students, it should be excluded from data provided by Entity to Evaluator. ● Standardized test scores of students, both before and after participation in the Xxxx.xxx program, for a test group and a comparable or matched group of students only if the Entity will participate in the study of computer science impact on other test scores The Entity will provide the Evaluator other support necessary for carrying out the evaluation, including facilitating parent/guardian permission, providing teacher registration and/or student rostering/registration information. The Evaluator may request longitudinal de-identified student achievement data for the current year, the preceding two (2) years until the end of a student’s participation in the program.
Sample 1
Evaluation Scope. Subject to the terms of the Agreement, Customer has the following rights to access and use the Informatica Products identified in the applicable Form solely for evaluation purposes for thirty (30) days unless a different period is specified in that Form, (the “Evaluation Period”). Customer may not, without Informatica’s prior written consent (a) use the Informatica Products for a longer duration or other purpose, including any commercial or business function; (b) use any live or regulated data for the evaluation unless authorized in writing by Informatica; or (c) install any software in the hosted environment without Informatica’s prior written consent.
Sample 1
Evaluation Scope. Subject to the terms of the Agreement, Customer has the rights to access and use the Informatica Products identified as commercially available above (the “Evaluation Products”) solely for evaluation purposes, and to access and use Informatica Products identified as pre-release above (the “Beta Products”) solely for testing and providing feedback to Informatica. Customer may not, without Informatica’s prior written consent (i) use the Informatica Products for a longer duration or other purpose, including any commercial or business function; (ii) use any live or regulated data; or (iii) install any software in the hosted environment without Informatica’s prior written consent.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Scope

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Schedule CLIENT REFERENCES The Tenderer shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. “Client Reference Scorecards” will be completed by each of the respective Clients for the projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. The following are to be completed by the Client and Principal Agent and is to be supported in each case by a letter of award and the works completion certificate. Both Client and Principal Agent must sign and stamp the documents, failure to obtain both signatures and stamps will result in no allocation of points. PROJECT NAME and SCOPE OF WORK: Principal agent: ................................................................................................................................. Client: .. ..............................................................................................................................................

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.